Who do you think was in the right during the Sino-Soviet split?
In my opinion they were both in the right and wrong. Mao was right that the UᛋᛋR was guilty of social-imperialism and that KKKhrushchev abandoned class struggle. But Khrushchev was also right MaoiSSts and they’re personality cults where going on a dangerous rampage and cozying up to close with KKKissinger. Basically nobody was in the right because they both had good points.
i think both china and the ussr are on the right, but if you turned the map upside down they would be on the left
What‘s the issue with social imperialism?
>>728944>What‘s the issue with social imperialism?Just like all forms of imperialism it doesn’t work and it will inevitably collapse
>>728941Kruschev of course. Mao went full nationalism instead of solidarity between socialist countries.
>>728944Excuse to go to war against socialist countries like when China invaded Vietnam.
>>728947They had a lot of solidarity with socialist countries such as Albania. China did not have solidarity with imperialist fascists like KKKruschev
I think that the countries that tried to play both sides had I right. The split never should have happened and It weakened the communist movement so much that they collapsed.
>>728988most of them got mass-raped by the CIA
>Who do you think was in the right during the Sino-Soviet split?they were both wrong because Stalin was a goddamn dumbass who declined Chinese ascension into the USSR
https://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv16n1/china.htm The side that didnt side with the anti communist crusader super power is in the right.
>>729134Kruschev was a revisionist so it was justified realpolitik.