/siberia/ - Off-topic

No nation or kingdom in the history of mankind has survived women having sexual moral agency. Women’s sexual instincts are to go after men who are cads. The more sexual partners that a man has had then the more that he is attractive to women. This type of scenario implies a severe lack of impulse control and an attachment to short term thinking. For the individual cad, this is not a problem. For the woman this is a problem. For a society, this is the worst thing possible save the barbarians at the gates, and even the barbarians are survivable in comparison to this threat.

Women cannot, do not, and have never in the history of mankind policed themselves in this matter. To be impolite, you are fucking deluded if you think that women would ever show leadership and police themselves in this regard.

The onus is and always has been on men to keep their women under control and to protect them from their own bad instincts. Frankly, our western societies are so far gone in this regard that I doubt they will survive the awful mistake of female emancipation. If they are to be saved then it will have to happen with the coming generations.

Which means fathers protecting their daughters with the active and understanding support of their wives. They must be on the same page on this.

It means raising your daughter with complete awareness of the realities of the sexual marketplace. And very simply that means that the more sexual partners that a woman has had then the less attractive she will be to men. This is the exact opposite of what women find attractive in cads. Daughters need to be raised and taught that they must protect their virginity at all costs .

And then fathers need to actively protect and support their daughters. This means that on no account would you send your teenage daughter away to college, as but one example. You raise her correctly and then you actively help her to find a prospective husband within your community. You don’t leave it up to chance. You don’t allow her to go out into the big bad world and “find herself”; you may as well throw her to the wolves. You treat your daughters as property that must be protected and you make damn well sure that her future husband will be up to the job of protecting

This is how societies behave that expect to survive. Your modernist ears might rebel against this message, but it’s not my fault that you’ve been drenched with modernist communist propaganda your entire lives. There is and never has been anything known as a “critical mass of queen bees”. On the other hand, there is and always have been societies that are patriarchal. Just why do you think modernists made that word to be both anathema and an ad hominem attack? You want the red pill on women? This is the FINAL red pill on women