/siberia/ - Off-topic

communists, socialists and anarchists also support the idea of a genuine nice guy, the leftist men I see get laid the most are the ones who first see women as people, thus feminism and a female lead society is a weapon against capital and the system itself.

>>735029
Bruh stop making threads. We made the containment thread to stop this. Also your dichotomy or quadchotomy or whatever is stupid. Everyone is a sum of their parts so yeah all of those are factors.

>Money
>Looks
>Strength
>Social life

You missed:
>Status

>>735032
If that was true why are women always complaining about the assholes they fuck/date/marry?

brain completely poisoned by idpol nonsense just to say dialectical materialism is real on a board full of leftists

>>735029
even in a perfect commune it would just devolve into rat utopia at some point i fear

It's over women won. Guys really need to go their own way. We just need sex dolls really

>>735032
>the ones who first see women as people,
This line is also retarded too. I think the only people who truly "objectify" women are the ones who use them. Why would these people be complaining about them unless they viewed them as people, they view them as people they dislike perhaps, but nobody would have that level of obsession over something they viewed simply as an "object."

Also the fucking premise like women don't objectify the shit out of men. A lot of them view men as an ATM, robot, tool to be used.

>>735034
>>735042
And I'm not saying don't be a good person. Goodness is it's own reward, often times the only one.

>>735034
yeah status is the main thing, but what ideology or political camp truly brings status? the techy republicans might have the money but they don't really have status, people fucking hate them.

>the asshole question

I think assholes are just sacrificing long term status for short term status by lying and decieving, at the end they get punished, I know because I have been there

It's all of them combined, but money will get you pussy but no love

>>735050
so then which ideological camp truly encompasses all? the way I see it the ideal man is leftist, feminist, has money and is physically attractive

>>735051
People say that women love money as if it's some biological thing but money hasn't always existed

>>735051
>Feminist

Hate to break it to you, but it's not feminism that women want. It's chivalry.

This OP is schizophrenic

>>735083
I'm trying to find out the truth, which political faction will win in the end via the choices of women

>>735101
Why would that be the cause of one to win or the other? What do you mean, by birthrates? The Amish, Haredis, Muslims, and Hindus. Maybe Mormons as well.

>>735101
This is a retarded question.
You're out of touch

>>735060
Doesn‘t need to be. Money signifies a universal resource, and women desire a man with a lot of resources.

>>735032
There are many players out there who don‘t care about feminism and are as misogynistic or even more so than the average man, therefore your claim is false. That‘s not to say that is what makes them successful, but that plenty of cases like that exist shows feminism isn‘t critical in getting women. And that‘s actually women‘s own fault. Women say they care about feminism but still care more about a guy being attractive, confident and successful and will not bother to make it a criteria if he read Bell Hooks or whatever. It‘s also not difficult to be misogynistic and still talk to women as people thereby giving the illusion that everything is fine.

>>735029
Communism won't do that. There are multiple huge industries built on telling us what women want, what they want at this point in time is being the hottest bitch that will seduce the highest-up man possible in the feudal hierarchy while also being humble and relatable. This does not differ between cultural contexts, media and it didn't change all that much since the ancient times. Even today, in modern contexts, the stories that women like most are about old money or direct continuation from the aristocracy of old.
I quite despise the gaslighting from people like >>735032, that hasn't been my experience in real life or culturally, science also doesn't say that feminist or nice men have it any easier. It's just offensive how brazen the lie "left-wing" people push is. It's probably a big reason why some young men get pushed in the direction of those absolutely moronic right-wingers at first, and that is likely the intention.
China apparently banned these kinds of stories recently? Could be just fake news, but that would make sense for a communist party. What women want is just part of the currently existing superstructure to be demolished. Not even bourgeois superstructure since this was a thing since forever and bourgeois simply inherited it. This applies to men too, but I don't think anyone here would have a problem with that. What men want is also far more unstable, so that likely won't be nearly as big of an issue.

>>735029
Thoughts?