From a species standpoint, we're doing just fine.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1766268905998.webm (2.49 MB, 406x720, 1607017968160.webm)

From a species standpoint, we're doing just fine. Glownonymous 20-12-25 22:15:06 No.737191

We've got somewhere between 8-10 billion of us running around on all seven continents. There's not another species of eukaryotes alive that has that kind of dispersion in so many different climates. From a national standpoint, so what? The people who sell it as a crisis are the only ones who truly benefit from our population expanding. With advances in tech potentially wiping out huge swathes of jobs, fewer people for labor actually works out in our favor as workers. Only the owner class benefits from excess workers. From a national security standpoint, all of the near-peer adversaries that are in the world are woefully behind usa military capability - even with our aging equipment. the immigration issue is backwards; governments historically OPEN UP avenues for immigrants when their populations dip. It's a whole lot quicker and cheaper to import workers that are already working age and work for lower wages than it is to raise a whole new generation.

What you're hearing is the whining cries of the ruling classes across the world that are seeing the erosion of traditional power structures, and they're too lazy and inbred to innovate and predict what the next tools of power/control will look like, so they want societies to revert or remain in older forms. Same shit happened during the Black Plague and the following Renaissance.

Anonymous 20-12-25 22:17:12 No.737192

File: 1766269031427.jpg (572.48 KB, 3072x2040, 71833-1021815601.jpg)

Anonymous 20-12-25 22:27:17 No.737195

That's something I thought about a lot. How humans have all these problems supposedly but objectively speaking we're actually doing quite fine in general given how we have been to expand ourselves so much in such a relatively short amount of time. Sure a lot of people live in poverty but that seems to be largely a human concept not found in nature. I don't know.

Anyways I got to add related to the video and unrelated to the subject but the chick is hot but her body is so weak looking. I mean most women have weak looking bodies. I think personally men have better looking bodies specially if they're moderately sculpted. Or rather men have stronger looking bodies and that seems better looking to me. I'm not saying this in a gay way at least I don't think I am but I guess I just think stronger looking bodies are more aesthetically pleasing. I think part of the appeal of women or at least hetero women is their purported and inherent weakness which makes it better for them not to have sculpted bodies. I prefer thicker curvier women anyways. Just my thoughts

Glownonymous 20-12-25 22:39:38 No.737199

The one and only reason why our governments view populations stabilizing as a bad thing is because it infringes upon their Ponzi Schemes, like the entire retirement system, which hinge upon ever growing populations.

Even complete shitholes in Africa and India are beginning to have massive decreases in birth rates.

Anonymous 20-12-25 23:10:35 No.737210

>>737191
sex

Anonymous 20-12-25 23:53:12 No.737226

thats the type of cope posts you see before things get really fucking bad

Anonymous 21-12-25 00:10:17 No.737245

Those mounds need a mounting (if you know what I mean).

Humanahumanahumanahumanahumanahumanahumanahumana

Anonymous 21-12-25 00:28:04 No.737257

I do not care about her breasts.

Anonymous 21-12-25 00:30:28 No.737258

wait till you hear about ants and earthworms

Anonymous 21-12-25 01:54:13 No.737309

File: 1766282052541.png (407.78 KB, 682x659, ClipboardImage.png)

>>737191
>There's not another species of eukaryotes alive that has that kind of dispersion in so many different climates.

Anonymous 21-12-25 08:46:17 No.737390

>>737309
Humans do the heavy lifting like *laughs* inventing technology 🤪 while ants just piggyback on our spaceships to colonize other worlds

Anonymous 21-12-25 10:19:45 No.737418

her dance moves are whack

Anonymous 21-12-25 14:36:16 No.737478

East Europe saw massive reductions in population in the past 30-40 years and the workers have less bargaining power than during the times of Iron Curtain and Socialist Block. Japan's population peaked about 15 years ago and is dropping by a million people every year, but there are no concessions to the remaining workers. West European countries like Italy, Greece and Portugal also passed their peak population and the workers over there didn't gain anything from the pool of workers thinning.

Anonymous 21-12-25 15:20:29 No.737483

>>737258
>>737309
You’re forgetting about the size, metabolic requirements, and lifespan of ants and earthworms compared to humans

>>737195
This is due to chivalry.
In most other species, females are bigger than the males due to having to give birth and they’re expected to be sturdy
Humans used to value sturdy looking women up until Anglo standards started globalising the frail physiognomic phenotype as female beauty proper.

>>737191
I remember when “population decline “ was a thing only in the right. That all switched around a year and a half ago.
I still believe that declining birth rates of the human species is a non-issue, in fact, it’s a necessity, especially for the west

We already have so many people inflicted with neurocognitive disorders, a job market with dwindling blue collar skills, a potential second Cold War with Russia, and worry about superviruses being used as the new nuclear bomb

Anonymous 21-12-25 15:28:00 No.737487

>>737390
Idk of ants can have the ability to piggyback spaceships.

They can lift twenty times their own weight because they’re relatively weightless.
Their mass/density is low enough that gravity isn’t as strong against them if they wanna lift.

But, that doesn’t mean they can piggyback a USS Enterprise

Anonymous 21-12-25 15:29:26 No.737488

>>737483
>I remember when “population decline “ was a thing only in the right. That all switched around a year and a half ago.
Libs have been talking about it for years. It's part of their argument for more migration + reworking social security. In Japan it's been a hot topic for at least a decade. Really it's only leftists who took too long to catch up to the economic relevance of the problem. You seem to think it's a purely ideological thing about an inherent need to preserve the race but factually a lot of the economy depends on evergrowing birth rates (which is of course impossible).

Anonymous 21-12-25 18:09:45 No.737565

>Lust provoking video
>Irrelevant time wasting hypothesis

Anonymous 21-12-25 18:23:24 No.737577

>>737309
Fat ass ants

Anonymous 21-12-25 19:19:08 No.737595

>>737565
look this comrade is not abolishing time by wasting it. what a puppet they are!!

Anonymous 22-12-25 01:48:05 No.737741

>>737195
>Sure a lot of people live in poverty but that seems to be largely a human concept not found in nature. I don't know.

Poverty does exist in nature. That’s why animals migrate to different biomes.
But mainly, it’s a fight or flight thing for animals. They often have to kill other species of animals for food for survival.

Anonymous 22-12-25 16:34:29 No.737937

>>737199
It's mostly the possible declines in the number of taxpayers, tithers and rectruits.

Anonymous 22-12-25 16:53:15 No.737944

>>737309
ants r kool

Unique IPs: 17