/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>738730
Soyjak website is worse than 4chan

Apparently on the bald men with glasses website there was a time when they had a bot that kept spamming that babyjak picture everywhere on their boards alongside nonsensical text and I guess someone is trying to imitate that here for some reason.

>>738731
+++
Pure degeneracy with shills, who draw cartoon characters to groom teens.

They're ads for a rage comic themed imageboard that uses websockets to load arbitrary javascript to deanonymize users.

>>738740
the site owner was also exposed for being israeli and having ties to mossad

>>738762
Rly? No, I have no doubt that Sharty is a political project, but is there really direct evidence of this?

>>738763
They literally sell ownership of the forum

>>738766
I don't follow the history of this shithole. Also, soyjaks have always been a political agenda even before the creation of sharty

kinda funny that the most advance sharty raiding technique still boils down to spamming soyjaks. I could get using such a strategy on mainstream websites like twitter or insta but I don't really see how they think spamming soyjaks and random slurs will work on a more jaded website full of people who have been using image boards for quite some time and are fully desensitized to that sort of stuff. You could literally do a better job trolling this board than every sharty raid combined by posting the flag of the PRC and nothing else.

>>738777
I suspect most sharty raids are just a form of communal posturing to connect with the rest of their fellow jakkers there and show their support for the community, I don't think they ever intend to make any serious damage or change to the websites they raid, same with the old /i/ raids back in the day.

The actual targets they do have a personal vendetta against usually get doxed and have pizzas sent to their homes and they usually don't treat those like a typical raid, judging by their threads. Which in the long run probably isn't that much more effective than regular spam raids but I don't know if they do anything more than that since I don't use the site obviously.

>>738777
>but I don't really see how they think spamming soyjaks and random slurs will work on a more jaded website full of people who have been using image boards for quite some time
most soytoddlers are 13 year olds that found out about imageboards a year ago on discord, twitter or tiktok

>>738771
I suspect Google invented soyjaks because why the hell would they give an artificial SEO boost to some rage comic meme for 10 years if it wasn't a webp situation where a Google executive refuses to admit it was a waste of time.

>>738737
Atleast they have the courtesy to do it in /siberia/