y'all whites in the west are absolute cucks, proof is y'all actually let Ur wife's dress up immodestly and in the end you get surprised if she cheats on you or another man hits on her, honestly we should be the ones cucking y'all instead of some black uyghur, you spend so much time spewing out propaganda of us to have people view us in a negative light, but that's because you know that if your women knew how we really are they would leave you and come flocking to our countries to suck our dicks
It's pretty overtly racist, yes.
Mostly an American occurrence, because of obvious historical reasons, but it's everywhere because of the cultural hegemony.
>>740884>honestly we should be the ones cucking y'all instead of some black uyghurso you're just jealous
A lot of them are but not because of their race so it isn't inherently racist to call out issues in American subcultures.
>>740884>The whole "blacked" & "BBC" thing is about seeing black people are savages, animals, sub-human.That is the premise, yes. Hence why it tends to be chuds or liberals okay with things that radiate chud energy that are into this stuff.
That said I do think the tattoo thing blackedbooru does has potential to shed it's BBC origins and become a broader tattoo fetish.
Tho given womb tattoos exist it's possible I'm just not well read on tattoo fetishes.
>>740970>Kinda sucks being into interracial porn for non racist reasons (I like the color contrast lmao)Same, plus lube makes darker cocks glisten in a way I think looks neat, sorta like latex. So even the "BBC" itself is appealing to me.
>>740970>Kinda sucks being into interracial porn for non racist reasons (I like the color contrast lmao) because pretty much you're in the extreme minority everyone else is just a racistI understand because regarding color contrast its hot seeing white guys with brown latina/asian women for the same reason but most discussion about that is rightoid subhumans going "uhuhuh colonization is LE BASED" with some animepornized drawing of an indigenous girl
>>740884>honestly we should be the ones cucking y'all instead of some black uyghur, you spend so much time spewing out propaganda of us to have people view us in a negative light, but that's because you know that if your women knew how we really are they would leave you and come flocking to our countries to suck our dicksHave sex.
Only mentally ill losers like race fetish shit regardless of which way it goes. Kill yourselves.
>>740884>you spend so much time spewing out propaganda of us to have people view us in a negative light, but that's because you know that if your women knew how we really are they would leave you and come flocking to our countries to suck our dicksBut there is arguably the most negative propaganda against black people and they still fuck white women. Something isn‘t adding up here. Maybe the men of your race are just unattractive regardless of propaganda?
OP's analysis is correct but his resented motivation makes hist post quite funny.
>>740884>we should be the ones cucking y'allWho is "we"?
>>741711
As a black man, this was hilarious to read. White males are infinitely insecure and butthurt about this and it puts a smile on my face.
>>741718based
>>741711>>741735see attached video
>bro is so triggered by women (who would never have sex with him anyways) having sex with black men that he saved gore videos to feel better about being a social reject
I sometimes wonder why people like this don‘t simply choose to be normal and go to therapy
how to make chuddie waste 4 hours of their life 😭:
post a single bbc video
>>741832well there isn‘t much to waste let‘s be honest
>>741834Honest question, that I do not think you will answer: why are you so hurt by a BBC thread?
>>741845he got blacked through the internet by seeing their dicks in his internet wife that he got parasocial for one second look.
the remedy for this is an actual relationship with an woman and stop being noided over being cucked at any second.
Could someone explain what's happening?
>>741853bbc rent free and an obsessed white boy's head.
>>741850
Seen. Now what?
>>740991>>740987>>740976>>740972>>740970>>740958I enjoy watching interracial porn as a black man (particularly BMWF porn, not that I am a milkman for exclusively white women, I believe a lot of them are attractive) but I still can't truly understand the appeal of raceplay categories such as Blacked, BBC, Bleached, etc. To me and some other leftists, it is a perversion of vanilla interracial porn for (usually) self-hating whites to enjoy. The "orks and elves" trope raceplay typically seems to portray interracial relationships from the perspective of online porn-addicted sex-crazed racists, who relegate themselves to sumbissive third-party spectators (known as cucks). Let us talked about "Blacked" for instance.
It weirds me as a blk male that certain white men have a kink for being "biologically defeated" by a masculine hypersexual black man (or the "bull") with a very long dong fucking his partner, with the white woman often a cheater or a sadist who looks down on the cuck and neither values him as a person or even herself, with the racist portrayals of blk men being violent and rapey.
The implications of this trope play into the "white genocide" conspiracy to an unnerving extent. The white woman having intercourse with the black guy is "tainting" her own racial bloodline in the process, deliberately aiding the decline of her own race and becoming a walking fleshlight for her "bull" to give birth to racially "impure" mixed babies. In the eyes of the cuck, he can do nothing about it but watch. Somehow he likes this and it becomes taboo.
I theorize a lot of "cucks" have trauma from high-school years, seeing an attractive woman "Stacy" dumping/rejecting him for "Tyrone". Or just plan old paranoid white racists.
My apologies if this long essay annoyed whoever reads this. This thread was about a subject I needed to get off my chest for some time now.
>>742746Effortposts are appreciated here, don't worry.
>>742746>I theorize a lot of "cucks" have trauma from high-school years, seeing an attractive woman "Stacy" dumping/rejecting him for "Tyrone".i doubt. I mean, must have happened to some of them but
considering the US since most ITT seems to be US-centered, it is definitely something that does not happen often enough to have this much people freaking out about it.
Most of these chuds surely have severe traumas and complexes from their teen years. nevertheless, it is all pretty much about what is summarized here:
>>741847. I believe it is that simple and sad.
>>744781>wjat causes this?What kind of men have you been with? Do you have a type?
>race play is racist
No shit you fucking retard
>>744797Oh. I was expecting you are going to say effeminate or something, which would provide non-racist explanation why you arent into blacks, but being into fat hairy ogres but not black ones is whacky.
>>744781>>have had nudes reposted here, on 4chan, on twitter, etc.>>had sex with like 50 peopleThat‘s really gross and devoid of self-respect. You must be one of those people with low self-esteem who constantly seek out sexual validation to gain any semblance of self-worth.
>>744823Love when hetmoids say shit like this, as if the only reason you arent the same isnt being bottlenecked by lack of desirability.
>>744829Hahaha, you‘re totally the stereotype of a bitter person making sense of everything based on some resentment you‘re struggling with. Has nothing to do with being a heterosexual man, it‘s about self-respect. Plus I‘ve probably rejected more women in my life than sex partners you had in total.
>>744829>fag defends fag based on faghood but doesn‘t criticize fag‘s racismInteresting
>>744842I am not a fag. Also not wanting someone dick in you is hardly racist.
>>744834>it‘s about self-respectAnd why would having lots of sex mean he lacks respects for himself? Sex is rather fun, mostly. Arguably having it with bears raises some red flags, but that isnt what you take issue with.
>>744842>>744897he cant be in our social club no more, that much i know
>>744898YOU GONNA TAKE CARE OF HIS TOP? AFTER HE IS GONE?
>>744897Saying that you would rather fuck a dog than a particular race is racist actually.
>>744897>And why would having lots of sex mean he lacks respects for himself?Posting nude images of yourself online is lack of self-respect. Being a slut who fucked dozens of people is a lack of self-respect and also carries the risk of STDs. You can have lots of sex with few sexual partners.
You don‘t seem to have a lot of brain cells. All of that was quite simple.
>>744909You in no way explained why. You just repeat "sex with lots of people = lack of selfrespect". What is your reasoning?
>>744906Different strokes for different folks.
>This thread
You should all be bred by BBC
>>744912I‘m not criticizing him for having a preference. To say you would rather fuck a dog than a particular race is a dehumanizing and degrading statement against that race, ergo racism.
>>744912Not picky -> Easy access -> Low value
>>744916Why do you assume he isnt picky? He said he mostly sleeps with bears, so he has a specific type he goes after.
>>744914It would be racist if he just blurred that out of nowhere, but given the fact it is relevant to the ongoing discussion, I would give him benefit of the doubt. I kind of relate to what he is saying, I am not attracted to any men, but for example when watching porn I search for something starring at least acceptably looking one, which throws away 99% of all porn and 100% of all featuring black men.
>>744918That something is relevant to the discussion doesn‘t mean the content of the response can not be racist. So the actual reason you don‘t want to call it racist is because you relate to his statement while continuing to omit that the exact thing that makes it racist is not the preference but the wording.
>>744918Assume? He literally said he is slutty and underlined that by saying he fucked 50 people. Meanwhile on average people have a handful or two sex partners in their lifetime.
>>744922All right, I concede. It was an off-color remark, it was highly inappropriate.
>>744927>Meanwhile on average people have a handful or two sex partners in their lifetimeNot average gays. Because gays can get as much sex as they wish. Hetero men would like to have more sex with more women, but arent desirable enough to women, so they have to settle for what they can get.
>He literally said he is sluttyYeah, so he wants to have lot of sex and has lot of sex. Again, what about that screams lack of self-respect to you?
>>744936My bad, that means gay men in general and many hetero men hypothetically are non-picky, STD riddled sluts
>>744983Whatever that means to you still doesnt answer the question of your assumptions about self-esteem.
>>744987self-respect* and I already did
>>744916 >>745008but he is selective about his partners, he said so.
>>745015If you said you wouldn‘t fuck anyone who has AIDS then you have certain criteria, but fucking 50 people still makes you a cheap slut. Having a couple of preferences doesn’t not make you a cheap slut if you end up fucking 50 people anyway. Intimacy is letting a person into your most vulnerable and affectionate state, and if you distribute this intimacy to many people then it and by extension yourself are cheap. You don‘t give yourself away cheaply when you have self-respect. Plus, if he‘s gay then he probably uses drugs and has unprotected sex because he doesn‘t fear pregnancy.
>>745026you are dripping with sexual resentment and frustration
>>745030Hey if it helps you sleep at night then do construct some imagined narrative in your head about me. Meanwhile a real counter argument is left to be seen.
>>745035There is no counterargument to be made because you havent presented any arguments in the first place. You expressed your feelings, and all I am doing is trying to get you to selfreflect about what their source is.
>>745036I repeatedly have women showing interest in me and I choose to have sex with only those I deem good enough. So you are just making a baseless insinuation to reframe the discussion. The argument is simple. Intimacy is one of the most profound acts between human beings. Easy access to something decreases its value. Intimacy with him is easily accessible as evident by him calling himself a slut and admitting he had sex with 50 men. Ergo, achieving intimacy with him is easy which degrades his intimacy as cheap.
>>745039>Easy access to something decreases its value.But that is literally wrong retard, air is the most accesible thing there is and it's the most valuable thing. Not even water or food is as valuable.
Also, imagine applyibg the market logic to relationships, kys tard.
>>745040It‘s because of the abundance of air that you don‘t waste a thought on whether you have it or not. You didn’t think about how valuable air is to you just a moment ago, because its abundance makes you take it for granted. Likewise all the men who emptied themselves in him like a cum dumpster probably didn‘t waste much thought on him either. If you have self-respect you don‘t put yourself in that place.
>>745039Anon, do you genuinely not see that you are merely making a series of normative statements and moral judgements? You keep avoiding the question *why* you feel this way. You are trying to rationalise those feeling, not examine where they come from.
>>745041None of the shit you just wrote disproves my point, Air remains extremely valuable and extremely accesible and this doesn't change just because you aren't noticing how valuable air is.
More importantly, air being valuable is an objective reality a person not being valuable because he is promiscus is subjective
Kys retard
>>745049Food and water is also indispensable for survival and yet both are sold quite cheap. That something is indispensable for survival doesn’t mean it‘s extremely valuable because if it is easy to attain due to abundance it contextually isn‘t that valuable.
>>745056>>745041Just to engage with your market analogy, wouldnt accessibility make it better? If you have two identical products, one you can get from corner store next to you and the other from a single shop on the other side of city at ten times the price, you would be a rube to pick the latter. You are looking at it as if you are his pimp, in which case scarsity would be to your benefit, at expense of everyone elses.
>>744916Hiii im back!
So understand firstly that just because I *flaunt* my sexuality around, does not mean I hand it out like candy!! ^w^
I've gone for some admittedly low-hanging fruits before, but they were pretty much all trans women, which frankly is a different class of low-level snag [a higher one, to be honest] :3
NOW
I will say that I have [almost] NEVER used a condom before! And I have also NEVER contracted ANY sti of any kind! :D
NOT EVEN HERPES X3
Why? Because I'm a *slut*, not a *whore*. A slut is someone who fucks anyone they *want*, a whore is someone who fucks anyone they *can* :3
I'm currently in a monogamous relationship with another trans woman whose like 15 years my senior. That's why I'm not, for example, posting my asshole right now. Maybe a body pic idfk but I've kinda gotten frumpy and dumpy since we moved in together. And yes the relationship is going down the shitter where she bickers over minute things and never has sex with me because her dumbass killed all her T with antiandrogens for some reason, but no, I will not cheat on her. I've legitimately *never* cheated on anyone ever. I will let this ship sink into the ocean, and when the ship leaves my feet for the depths below, only then will I consider doggy-paddling to the shore.
Also I know how to cook, and u don't, bitch :p
>>745058You‘re raising an interesting point. The answer lies in what need it fulfills and that this need is actually tied to its inaccessibility. A Lamborghini doesn‘t just serve to take a person from place A to B. If that were all then you could just buy any car or leave it at a ticket to drive the bus. It‘s about status or the distinct experience of driving a Lamborghini. When you want to marry a person you‘d prefer that your love is special and sex is a part of this love. But if this person made this experience easily accessible it diminishes it and by extension their love. That‘s not to say love is only sex, but it is a fair bit of it given that sexlessness in a relationship is an indicator of the poor quality of the relationship. Promiscuity is also an indicator for how unsuccessful a future marriage will be. So in that case the inaccessibility makes it better, but you are always free to marry the town bicycle.
>>745056Listen here moron, first of all, let's set thing straight, your argument boils down to the idea that there is a single source of value, and that is, value comes from the notion that something is valuable if it can be considered hard to acquire, according to you, valuable things are those which are harder to acquire, while non-valuable things are those that are easy to acquire, a single instance where this is not the case should be enough to disprove your value theory. In this case, air being extremely valuable and extremely easy to acquire, and make use of, proves your entire bullshit wrong. My argument is that value comes from an objective source, that is, how useful something is. There is still a subjective element to this, but it is irrelevant for now
>Food and water is also indispensable for survival and yet both are sold quite cheap. That proves your point wrong, not mine
>That something is indispensable for survival doesn’t mean it‘s extremely valuable because if it is easy to attain due to abundance it contextually isn‘t that valuable.You are literally retarded, food being cheap doesn't mean it is not extremely valuable, under capitalism, food is cheap, but still extremely valuable, sure context matters, but food being valuable is objective because every human needs food, the caloric amount of food doesn't change just because it is harder to obtain for someone and easy to obtain for another person
>>745058Exactly, more importantly, in the context of sexual reproduction, the more demanded an individual, the more value it has. This is true for literally every sexed lifeform
>>745067> It‘s about status or the distinct experience of driving a LamborghiniAnd that is entirely subjective, which I already proved being completly irrelevant here
>>745049 >>745067Status with whom? You marry a woman so that men jerk you off? It seems like a fundamental issue is that you dont see sex as a fun play, but a status symbol to your friends.
(files uploaded in reverse order, the animated shitpost is obviously a shitpost)
>>745069>In this case, air being extremely valuable and extremely easy to acquire, and make use of, proves your entire bullshit wrong.You are merely asserting that air is extremely valuable and gloss over actually proving it. I already stated that air is necessary for survival but that doesn’t make something extremely valuable because if it is abundant and therefore easily attainable it becomes cheap, as evident by market prices.
>>745091Are you implying market prices do not have an objective source? You do know that this has literally been proven to be case right?
>>745070You didn‘t prove anything, you‘re just repeatedly sperging out. Plus, something being subjective doesn‘t make it irrelevant. Need is subjective in general because there are few things you actually need and still people obsess about having needless things. And of those things that you do need it‘s still subjective which variants you choose and how much of them you choose. All of that impacts price. In fact, whether you want to live or not is also subjective so no need is a must to begin with.
>>745093I‘m saying prices are contextual while you have a contextless, absolute conception of value that is clearly wrong.
>Need is subjective
Wrong
>it‘s still subjective which variants you choose and how much of them you choose.
Doesn't make the biologucal impulse behind said need subjective
>All of that impacts price
Wrong
>Your conception of prices is wrong
Wrong
Here, I am 99% sure this is the document I read here in lefttpol many years ago that shows prices are related to labour, and not "subjective" needs
https://www.ehu.eus/Jarriola/Docencia/EcoMarx/EcoMarx%20frances/labthvalue.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.comMods, ban him for being a chud and being anti-materialist.
Unique IPs: 40