>>745366Liberal 🧑🏫 Mr. Tugan-Baranovsky is on the 🥷 path against socialism. 👇️ ⏰ 👉️👨 has approached the ❔, ❌️ from the political ➕ economic «, but from 🔄📦️ of an abstract 💬 on 🟰 (❔ the 🧑🏫 🧠 such an abstract 💬 more suitable for the religious ➕ philosophical gatherings ❓️❔🔍️ 👉️👨 has 📢?).
“If 👉️👫 🤲 socialism, ❌️ as an economic theory, but as a 🧬 ideal,” Mr. Tugan declared, “then, undoubtedly, 👉️📦️ is associated with the ideal of 🟰, but 🟰 is a concept … 🔄📦️ cannot be deduced from experience ➕ reason.”
👇️ is the reasoning of a liberal 🎓️ 👤❔ 🔁 the incredibly trite ➕ threadbare argument 🔄📦️ experience ➕ reason 🔍️ prove 🔄📦️ 👥 are ❌️ , ⏳️ socialism bases 👉️📦️ ideal on 🟰. Hence, socialism, if 🫵 🙏, is an absurdity ❓️❔🔍️ is contrary to experience ➕ reason, ➕ so forth!
Mr. Tugan 🔁 the ❌🆕 trick of the reactionaries: 🌓 to misinterpret socialism by 🛠️ 👉️📦️ 😵 to be an absurdity, ➕ then to triumphantly refute the absurdity! When 👉️👫 💬 🔄📦️ experience ➕ reason prove 🔄📦️ 👥 are ❌️ , 👉️👫 mean by 🟰, 🟰 in abilities or similarity in physical strength ➕ mental ability.
👉️📦️ 🚶 without 💬 🔄📦️ in 👇️ 🫡 👥 are ❌️ . No sensible 👤 ➕ no socialist forgets 👇️. But 👇️ kind of 🟰 has ❌📦️ 😝 to do with socialism. If Mr. Tugan is quite unable to 🧠, 👉️👨 is at least able to 📖; were 🤥 to 🏞️ the 👍️-💡 💼 of 1️⃣ of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, 🎯 against Dühring, 👉️👨 would 🔍️ 👉️ a 🌠 § explaining the absurdity of 💭 🔄📦️ economic 🟰 means 🎲📦️ else < the abolition of 🚲️. But when 🧑🏫 📐 😵 to refute socialism, 1️⃣ 🚫 🧠 ❓️❔ to 💭 at 📊⬆️—👉️👥 stupidity, 👉️👥 🤷, or 👉️👥 unscrupulousness.
Since 👉️👫 have Mr. Tugan to 🤝 with, 👉️👫 shall have to 🎬️ with the rudiments.
By political 🟰 Social-Democrats mean ➡️, ➕ by economic 🟰, as 👉️👫 have ✅ 💬, 👉️👥 mean the abolition of 🚲️. As for establishing 👱 🟰 in the sense of 🟰 of strength ➕ abilities (physical ➕ mental), socialists do ❌️ even 🧠 of such things.
Political 🟰 is a demand for political ➡️ for 🌐 citizens of a 🏞️ 👤❔ have 🫱, a certain 🔞 ➕ 👤❔ do ❌️ suffer from ⚖️ ordinary or liberal-professorial feeble-mindedness. 👇️ demand was 🌓 advanced, ❌️ by the socialists, ❌️ by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie. The 👍️-💡 historical experience of 🌐 countries of 🌎️ proves 👇️, ➕ Mr. Tugan could 🌊 have discovered 👇️ had 👉️👨 ❌️ 📞 “experience” to 👁️🗨️ solely in 🦁 to ♟️ 🧑🎓️ ➕ 🧑⚕️, ➕ 🙏 the ^ 🔄📦️ be by “abolishing” socialism.
The bourgeoisie put ⏩️ the demand for ➡️ for 🌐 citizens in the struggle against 👑, feudal, serf-owner ➕ caste privileges. In , 👉️💡, unlike , 🇨🇭 ➕ ↪️ countries, the privileges of the nobility are preserved to 👇️ 📆 in 🌐 spheres of political 🧬, in elections to the Council of State, in elections to the Duma, in municipal administration, in taxation, ➕ many ↪️ things.
Even the 📊⬆️ 🥄-👁️🗨️ ➕ 🤷♂️ 👤 🥫 grasp the fact 🔄📦️ individual members of the nobility are ❌️ in physical ➕ mental abilities 🎲 more < are 👥 belonging to the “tax-💰️”, “base”, ’_-🍼” or “non-privileged” peasant 🚲️. But in ➡️ 🌐 nobles are , ⚖️ as 🌐 the peasants are in 👉️👥 lack of ➡️.
Does 👉️👫 📚️ liberal 🧑🏫 Tugan ⏱️ 🐨 ⬆️👤 the difference between 🟰 in the sense of ➡️, ➕ 🟰 in the sense of strength ➕ abilities?
👉️👫 shall ⏱️ 🤝 with economic 🟰. , as in ↪️ advanced countries, 👉️ are no 👑 privileges. 🌐 citizens, are in political ➡️. But are 👉️👥 as regards 👉️👥 🧘 in social production?
No, Mr. Tugan, 👉️👥 are ❌️. Some 🏆️ ⛰️, 🧑🏭️ ➕ capital ➕ live on the unpaid ⚒️ of the 🧑⚕️; 👇️👇️ form an insignificant minority. ↪️👥, 📛, the vast mass of the population, 🏆️ no means of production ➕ live only by 🪝 👉️👥 ⚒️-⚡️; 👇️👇️ are proletarians.
👉️ is no aristocracy, ➕ the bourgeoisie ➕ the proletariat 😊 political ➡️. But 👉️👥 are ❌️ in 🚲️ status: 1️⃣ 🚲️, the capitalists, 🏆️ the means of production ➕ live on the unpaid ⚒️ of the 🧑⚕️. The ↪️ 🚲️, the wage-🧑⚕️, the proletariat, 🏆️ no means of production ➕ live by 🪝 👉️👥 ⚒️-⚡️ in the market.
The abolition of 🚲️ means 🛐 🌐 citizens on an 🦶 with regard to the means of production belonging to 🌐👥 as a whole. 👉️📦️ means 🎁➡️ 🌐 citizens opportunities of 💼 on the 📢-owned means of production, on the 📢-owned ⛰️, at the 📢-owned 🧑🏭️, ➕ so forth.
👇️ explanation of socialism has been necessary to enlighten 👉️👫 📚️ liberal 🧑🏫, Mr. Tugan, 👤❔ , if 👉️👨 tries 💪, ⏱️ grasp the fact 🔄📦️ 👉️📦️ is absurd to expect 🟰 of strength ➕ abilities in socialist 🌐👥.
In brief, when socialists 🗣️ of 🟰 👉️👥 always mean social 🟰, 🟰 of social status, ➕ ❌️ by 🎲 means the physical ➕ mental 🟰 of individuals.
The puzzled reader ❓️: how could a 📚️ liberal 🧑🏫 have forgotten 👇️👇️ elementary axioms familiar to 🎲👤 👤❔ has 📖 🎲 exposition of the 🪟 of socialism? The ✅ is 🧩: the 💻️ qualities of 🎁-📆 🧑🏫 are such 🔄📦️ 👉️👫 🔍️ among 👉️👥 even exceptionally stupid 👥 👍️ Tugan. But the social status of 🧑🏫 in bourgeois 🌐👥 is such 🔄📦️ only 👉️👉️ are allowed to 🫱 such 🏤 👤❔ 💸 🦠 to 🍦 the interests of capital, ➕ 💯 to utter the 📊⬆️ fatuous nonsense, the 📊⬆️ unscrupulous drivel ➕ twaddle against the socialists. The bourgeoisie will 🙇 the 🧑🏫 🌐 👇️ as 📏 as 👉️👥 🚶 on “abolishing” socialism.