instead of narcissistic inquisitors of the modern age, wouldn't they come after dog- and cat-ownera first, instead of just regular proles?
>you own a completely unnecessary meat-eating beast! Please euthanize it and move on with your life!!
This would be logical and understandable.
Instead, they shit on developing third world countries being able to afford meat for the first time in generations, and like first world proles who just want to eat a fucking steak after a hard day of labor.
1. Are vegans strategically inept or simply misanteophic or both?
2. Are vegans literally fetishizing cutesy pets to the point that they are no longer able to understand what contradictions this leads to?
3. Can we safely say that if you own a meat eating pet you can not claim to be a vegan?
Thank you for your attention to this matrace!
>inb4 owning cats/dogs and feeding them vegan shit
This is called animal torture, something you are supposed to be against supposedly
You can claim to be whatever you want to be. It doesn't matter.
Gas yourself retard
>>746631dogs are perfectly fine on a vegan diet, cats no
Just invest in artificial meat until we can make ethical pet food
As for people, there is no excuse to not be vegan unless you are literally homeless
>starts thread with a tu quoque logical fallacy
Meat riders are not beating the low I.Q allegations with this one. There's nothing of substance to respond here.
Fuck your mutilated bioslaves. Pugs can't breathe properly and pitties maul toddlers. Dogs are only good for covering footpaths in poop and waking up the whole block by having a barking fit at night. Get a herbivore like a cockatiel or gerbil. Or a bioactive terrarium with detritivores, which don't even need feeding- they eat dead plant matter and each others' corpses
>>746667Dogs should be genetically modified to eat dead plant matter and each others' corpses, tbh.
>unnecessary […] beast!
There's serious, non-malthusian reasons to recognize that meat is a scam.
>>746690Vegan pseudo-science is on par with Scientology, tbh.
>>746700I feel like I'm missing a distinction between a capital V veganism and veganism as referring to general aversion to animal products.
I'm more moral than any of you because I'm a DOUBLE VEGAN. I minimize suffering because I eat animals that eat animals (humans are also animals btw).