I have heard so many Conservacucks criticize Wikipedia for its coverage on Climate Change, Transgenderism, January 6th, Gaza, you name it. Because the right seemed to hate it so much I took it as a given that it was generally reliable however I have been told be leftist that it it not because it has inaccurate coverage of Xinjiang and the Holodomor as well as many other famines under communist governments. What do you think?
>>746799I generally agree with that
>>746802>>746799the one caveat I would add too wikipedia is to keep in mind anything political along with controversial historical events might genuinely have a couple volunteers fighting off attempts by various groups to astroturf and spread historical revisionism. An extreme example being the time when Fascists hijacked Croation Language Wikipedia.