>>748444You could say that they abstractly have all the rights that other people also have already, including reluctant and obstructive access to healthcare, but this is flawed:
People with particular needs deserve "new" rights that uphold their needs.
To say that everyone has the same rights and therefore it is "fair" is pure liberal demagoguery:
You could say that everyone has an equal right to marry the opposite sex, so it's fair and gays have nothing to complain about.
Everyone has an equal right to own private property, so the proletariat doesn't have anything to complain about.
And that's just talking about "official", enshrined rights. The marginalized are subject to "extrajudicial" discrimination and oppression, that technically violate some rights or laws that are simply not enforced in their case, because the prejudice is systemic. It requires real, material power to force the "law" to apply to certain people whom it ignores.
Building such power and protection requires a degree of "hipocrisy": special treatment, DEI, affirmative action, etc. Eg, society has to recognize that there is no such thing as reverse-racism, only racism. To actually protect the racially discriminated, they have to have an enforced right to not be subject to racism, while not protecting the herrenvolk from "reverse-racism".