Women want doms. Yes, I am generalizing because the 0.1% of women who feel attracted to a sub are irrelevant.
truthnuke
>t. sub
And most men are not chad doms. So what is to be done? Make them homosexual
Too bad everyone will have to settle with what they can get. Which means nobody for most guys probably.
>>751566They can get other guys
>>751560What exactly is wrong with maledom?
I don't get the appeal of being sub tbh
Even with age play I find dominating older women hot
chill out bruh, why are you so horny all the time, just jack off dude, no need to make threads like this.
>>751579Then what's the point of making threads?
>>751580to have fun conversations and enjoy interacting with others, i realize that's an unfamiliar experience to you
>>751580I don't know dude something else? can you talk about something else besides how women are and why you can't get sex?
it's a topic, I have no problem with this topic being discussed sometimes but it's EVERY FUCKING TIME.
life can be other things besides you not getting sex you know? I didn't have sex today but I went for a run and now I'm drinking some coffe, get it together brother there is a whole world out there.
>>751574requires effort from the male, losers want to just lie down and be coddled by a woman forever and when that doesn't happen they become whiny incels like op
>>751584it doesn't really require effort, it's not hard to slap a bitch and pull her hair
>>751581I'm not having fun.
>>751560Women are subs by nature/gender.
can this become a dogeza thread
>>751604i think it's that pose… i'd be on board but i don't like Japan so just a maledom thread would be nice.
>>751611Sabinyak, you already know what I'm about to say.
OP is an EXTREMELY obvious sub that gets off at humiliating himself.
Wrong. Women want bishonen hunks in both from and sub roles.
If any imageboard patron male were to take the dom role, it would end up rape accusations.
>>751583I've said the same thing so many times it's unbelievable
>>751584The same could be said about women who want men to always take the lead, though
>>751575>This is fascist because it doesn't have a cute pussy haver in the foreground.Smh
>>751587Not exactly.
>>751590This. People here are just perpetual misers.
>>751675>The same could be said about women who want men to always take the lead, thoughTRVKE: yes, most women are losers.
>>751560>>751587Women are doormats which is pathetic but so are men who get on their knees for their "superior" 1 step above them on the social ladder. So much for the independent male.
>>751697yeah, the way most men behave towards other men with slightly higher position makes them look like bottoms who want to get their back blown out.
>>751697>>751709It's like how adults, particularly adult males, bully/patronize their juniors for the slightest transgression but they never discipline older people for being shitty customers.
Why is it that adults are never spanked for cussing out clerks for forgetting small orders?
I wish there more female doms. i don’t wanna be degraded or tied up, i just wanna be held in her arms and told im pretty
>>751578personally for me i just like having someone else think for me. I feel stressed out with most of the things in my life, i just want someone to tell me “it’s ok i’ll lead”
>>751732I want to be told I'm pretty too, but more so by a helpless gurl in heat than a mommy.
>>751733But you probably ain't leading in your day to day life anyway
Sexually dominating someone is one of the few instances you can gain that gratification.
>>751725It would be hilarious if adults were spanked in stores. I guess they'd have to do more of a caning as opposed to a spanking. That'll probably drive the message home much better.
Anyways I always click on a thread that has a lust provoking image like the one here.
>>751732Bro you don't need femdom you need an affectionate partner. She can even "take the lead" in a romantic sense without being a dom sexually. Why do men think like this now?
>>751873There isn't that great of a variance with women to begin with. Submissive attitude in a relationship strongly correlates with submissive attitude in sex. The variance is probably greater among queers but not so heteros.
>>751873Men do think that women can take the lead romantically without being a dom. But mens wishes for gentleness are always disregarded as chauvinism
>>751880I'm convinced that heterosexual romance is a farce outside continuing ones bloodline.
>>751880Outside of outright tradwife types who let their husbands decide everything for them what does being submissive in a relationship even mean? Do you think most women are submissive in a relationship? How do you measure this?
>>751884>Men do think that women can take the lead romantically without being a domThe other guy you quoted directly contradicted this.
>But mens wishes for gentleness are always disregarded as chauvinism So now women are simultaneously ultra-submissive by nature but also refuse to treat their partners gently?
>>751887>The other guy you quoted directly contradicted thisYou're just generalizing. Also imageboard patrons should never be used as a baseline for the average person.
>So now women are simultaneously ultra-submissive by nature but also refuse to treat their partners gently?You're being willfully obtuse. I'm saying that men wishing to be treated gently while not being in the lead is looked down upon by society.
>>751889>You're just generalizingI never said "all men think like this".
>You're being willfully obtuse. I'm saying that men wishing to be treated gently while not being in the lead is looked down upon by society.No, you said that it's "disregarded as chauvinism". Everybody knows male softness is looked down upon, but it's not primarily for the reason you're implying. Saying it's "disregarded as chauvinism" is implicitly attributing that view to women and feminists, as if men in general were much more accepting.
>>751560This picture is activating more neurons than expexted.
When did this stopped being common knowledge? You didn't fell for libfem journos in the 2010's inventing a "anti-masculinity" dating scene, did you anon?
In the end, the most important thing will always be what the other side can't have be itself. Money, attractiveness, social status, physical strenght, etc.
>>751926>In the end, the most important thing will always be what the other side can't have be itself. Money, attractiveness, social status, physical strenght, etc.This.
Beauty, brains, brawn, and brevity are the elements of romantic prospects
>>751896They'll never take that responsibility besides women don't generally like most men unless he's attractive or high status. Most guys don't really look that good but most women aren't much better. If someone doesn't need to take responsibility for something they probably won't.
>>751560I don't care. I'm fine enough with the heteronormative way. The problem is that there is this mercenary attitude to relationships so many women seem to have. It's the dream of "I'll just seduce the guy with money and power" that most women's romantic media seems to represent. It's clearly a thing even when I talk to women in real life, women that I respect too. It's not as dramatic but that's clearly what so many of them want. The more parasitic the better too, all that women's romance media is about aristocracy which is a purely parasitic class. Guys don't give a fuck, a poor girl is just as good as a rich one if they're equally hot and they especially don't have this possibility of entering the parasite class for looking pretty giving them one more excuse not to be class conscious. Sure these faggots still manage to but it's one more thing to worry about.
One thing that the "western left" got wrong in my opinion is that human psychology is not a communist's friend, sexuality especially. It doesn't care about material conditions and materialism and class interest, otherwise there would be no this cringe identifying with conquistadors and white people shit so many people in Latin America do. Women still seem to be getting class conscious so it's fine but that's despite the way they want things to go. Material conditions are above psychology.
I have no idea why the femdom meme is so widespread other than it being (pardon the phrase) "safe horny."
That is: its a way of referencing BDSM that isn't going to offend anyone's sensibilities. Femdom is the most generally socially acceptable form of BDSM, so its what gets shown the most in public media. But its not actually all that common, nor is it particularly hot.
>>752137I think it is popular because people find it funny
Male abuse is funny, specially if done by women
And
Women can't be conceived as being bad/sadistic people
>>751881enlighten us then. What is every chud on this site missing
>>752137>I have no idea why the femdom meme is so widespread other than it being (pardon the phrase) "safe horny."I think you hit the nail on the head there.
>>752137it's not safe horny at all. it's just ridiculous because men aren't supposed to be submissive so it's played off as a jok
>>752137>most generally socially acceptable form of BDSMwouldn't it be like huh,spanking ?
but you can try gatekeeping fetishes all you want bud,have fun
"safe horny" "safe edgy" words no ever human being ever pronounced I swear
>>752172Name one piece of media where BDSM was represented by a man spanking a woman.
This is just porn
>>752172I love it when people make neologisms for human behaviors.
People cannot like anything without being pathologized for it.
"Men who like (insert color here) (insert shape here) are more likely to (insert criminal activity here)"
>>752172All representations of spanking or whipping in popular media I can think of have been about a woman spanking or whipping a man.
>>752185The sex and relationship thread should've just turned into the biggest porn thread. It's just asking for it.
>>752185Nah m8 I would've dumped my femdom porn but I'm busy
If you fuck with bisexual/lesbian women (you have to look androgynous tho) they'll dominate you. I even broke the lesbian out of a couple of ladies. You have to use some gaslighting and some of them are BPD. The relationship gets pretty toxic, but damn best secks ever. They love to gather dirt on you (i don't mind humiliation so i don't care) that's what turns sadistic women on.
>>752185Sure, you and I can turn it into a porn thread
>>751675Most women are losers, it's just that it's more socially acceptable for them to be so
>>753512To put it simple
OP is a fag
>>753514You said it not me Sabinyak ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
WTF is a "dom"?
if you want REAL domination go get literally raped in a meth-hell street at 3AM
otherwise you're doing (((dark academia roleplay)))
>>753512There's also misandry on here and virgin shaming
>>753508Only when they're young and docile and pretty. Women are only held in contempt when they age and lose their docility and have kids and end up divorced
>>751738I think Karens should be punched in the skull with wooden canes.
Especially if they bully a younger single childless coworker.
>>753512It's simple:
1. Criticizing women is misogyny
2. As communists, we must be ruthless critical of everything that exists
3. Women exist
4. Therefore, every serious communist will be a blatant misogynist.
>>753512Dom is a common fetish and 99% of the people holding that fetish are lib PMCs irl
>>753707I cannot tell if you're agreeing with him but doing so in sarcasm but if you are:
Men get criticism far more than women. Or rather, they get less sympathy.
God forbid that you criticize one aspect of the female sex as a man while women nitpick any slight masculine nuance as rapey or devolutionary.
Yet, when men don't have any masculine nuance, these same women accuse them of being incompetent.
Yah just cope for their faggotry. Online though? Smart people can be, 'anywhere'
>>753730And yet you haven't posted any porn yourself. Curious.
>>753730As much as I hate to say it, 4chan was smart for having semi-porn boards for male and female characters
>>753707>3. Women existNot true, didn't you see the video I added with the post?
Bump for dom!
Bullshit. My ex was a dom
Req. the truth. Teach me they live the anal!!
>>751577>dominant men want submissive partner>submissive women want dominant partnerwhat a shock, never saw that coming
>>751583it gets boring fast, same thread every week
>>751585true, even a chud can do this
>>751590oversexualizing everything maybe? or something along this line
>>753514kek reminded me of that japanese streamer who pretended to be a femboy when was actually a woman
>>754568>>dominant men want submissive partner>>submissive women want dominant partner>what a shock, never saw that comingwasn’t the point, retard
>>754112How can it be over if it never began?
>>754582This
If it was over, that implies that they had a a chance and took it
>>754603
When you look at the numbers posted ITT, most subs have no chance. We are an undesirable section of undesirable gender.
>>754605>Undesirable genderOnly simps think like this
Undesirable sector of a gender is more accurate
>>754570if you need a study or a graph to find that out you are beyond salvation
>>753975🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔴
>circles are usually blue<UHHH THERES A RED ONE RIGHT THERE YOU FUCKING RETARD???? >>754934How many of this shithole's posters are this reactionary?
>>754934🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
What do you mean? According to my sources they are way more red dots
>>754934>>755009>What do you mean? According to my sources they are way more red dots🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
WHAT? my sources there are no blue dots at all
>>754934>>755009>>755269What if there's a yellow dot?
>>755269>WHAT? my sources there are no blue dots at all🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
Your sources are wrong! Those dots are actually Red Squares!
The 12th one couldn't make it, its still in Moscow>>755270>What if there's a yellow dot?Probably a libertarian
Unique IPs: 63