I made the first woke imageboard:
https://libpol.orgCome check it out if you're interested. Only rule is you have to be woke. You don't necessarily have to be a lib. (We generally lean more center-left than far-left, but the users range from communist to demsoc to socdem to neoliberal.)
(Picrel quiz is
https://wokepuritytest.com - no relationship with me/the site)
>>751762I am 100% sincere. Some others who've used it before can confirm. I've seen some leftypolers write screeds here after being banned from libpol for using racial slurs (after initial mod warnings).
Here are some posts from the past 30 minutes to prove the site exists and is real
Oh yeah, i remember you guys hosted a /tttt/ refuge board when 4chin was down. I'm not going to connect to your site over clearnet though.
>>751768Yeah that was us
You can use a VPN if you want. We block Tor (like most imageboards) due to abuse etc. but generally not VPNs. But if you still don't trust it, that's understandable
>>751769Do you know the site admin? I'm gathering imageboard operators for a coordinated defense project against csam and spam in general >>>/meta/res/43906
If they have a github account, i can invite them to the project page. We also have a discord, but i don't know if i'm authorized to give that out.
>>751773I am the site admin/dev (and I am OP of this thread). We do have a lot of stuff to try to counter CSAM/spam/flooding/raids and have more things planned.
I'm not sure I want to be invited to anything, sorry. We're running some unusual software (heavily modified fork of
https://github.com/bakape/shamichan/tree/v6) and we're closed source and intentionally don't reveal our counter-spam/anti-bot techniques to avoid tipping off raiders and bot owners.
We almost never receive any CSAM spam anymore due to our measures. I will say that there's one very, very, very simple thing that keeps out almost all bots, including like 99% of CSAM spammers. At least for us. If you want you could join our Discord (linked on our site) and I could DM a broad overview.
>>751776>We're running some unusual softwareOur software isn't in good shape currently, but we're writing it with the express purpose to be portable across different imageboards, textboards and other bbs software.
>don't reveal our counter-spam/anti-bot techniques to avoid tipping off raiders and bot ownersThis is why we're pushing the code to a private github project.
>If you want you could join our DiscordSorry, i don't do discord. Our discord is linked to an irc server.
If you don't feel comfortable discussing your defense strategy with us, i will just remember to reach out to you once we've shipped the first release.
>>751769how do i unhide? i was testing the hide feature and i accidentally hid a cute cat
>>751783Click the cog wheel at the top right of the page, click the "Extra" tab at the top, and click "Unhide [n] hidden posts" at the bottom.
>>751786Only if you're a member of the group in question.
Btw, we also run a Glegle booru at
https://glegle.gallery >>751788I won't say too much about how it works but we have some basic measures to prevent gore floods etc. You will be able to post images once the system recognizes you're not a spammer. It won't take long.
And yeah, our imageboard and our boorus don't allow any NSFW images
>>751794FYI basically all of the site is permanently dead except for
https://libpol.org/lgbt/ , which is often very active. (It's a "single-thread board", which is a board mode in our software. Users can create and configure their own boards.)
And yeah sorry we don't allow NSFW images. You'll have to use other sites for that. Many are out there
I got permabanned for saying (ironically) "foid"
Bad site, already reseted my router so I get another IP to post anyways
>>751811You got banned for writing "kill all foids" shortly after writing a bunch of stuff about how you really wanted to post gore and how all liberals need to be killed and "is buggifting encourraged here?" and "have you ever cruised to get aids" and other nonsense
See: the OP
>>751760>Only rule is you have to be woke. >>751822I am homosexual I am literally biologivally woke
And I got auto-banned, just because of writing "foid"
>>751760Liberalism has nothing to do with your sexual idpol.
>>751856What even is liberalism other than capitalism, electoral democracy and sexual idpol? ethnic idpol?
>>751857>What even is liberalism other than capitalism, electoral democracyNot much else.
>ethnic idpol?I would put this in the same category as fascism.
>>751861But when I look at liberal countries they're always making ethnic factions for their democracy, like mexican voters, black voters, asian voters, etc
>>751823So tony soprano is gay, trans, has gay and trans friends, reads homestuck and plays toby fox games?
>>751823Don't worry, I got a generous 38 (prageU) (I marked crossdressing because once when I was 15 I tried on a skirt and also marked dying hair but I just want a redhead, not any quirky colours) and I am literally homosexual. If i were less generous I could've got a 30-32
Me thinks the place needs a better name cus i bet a lot of people are scared to post bcus it says "lib"
i wanna post about Hytale in /v/ but it ded
>>751823i also got that cus i'm a tran but also i believe "tradition" is important as a tool to pass down doctrines and teachings through generations, but as every tool it has to be sharpened and optimized.
like Hytale.
>>751959Can you post a gif of yourself shaking your fat boobies?
>>751760I got "Kirkland Signature" with a Charlie Charlie Kirky gif. I did not select "Empathize with Socialist Ideals" because I am a communist and not a humanist pre-Marx idealist socialist.
>>751959>"tradition" is important as a tool to pass down doctrines and teachings through generations, but as every tool it has to be sharpened and optimized.Trve. IMO a "naturalistic fallacy" or appeal to tradition is more often than not correct, because you can restate it as an evolutionary argument, meaning things are a certain way, precisely because they were able to remain so for some time (compare the Hegelian "everything that is real is rational"). That is not to say everything rational is desirable though, as can be attested of heterosexual rape, which has certainly "worked" for millennia.
>>751982Can you recreate yourself in Hytale and flash your big squishy castizas boobs?
>>751760How does listening to lemon demon make you woke waddahell
Femtanyl I get
>>752105> I, uh, I don't think I can say this one, actually.Is it calling you a faggot?
I am really the one with the lowest score here? This test is unfair anyways, I play mainly with male characters because I like men, how is this not woke?
>>752106That or a transhumanist
>>752107Sorry anon, being a cis gay man that isn't into thigh highs and shit is conservative now, the overton window moves
>>752105Lemon Demon calls Eric Bauman's lawyers gay as an insult in ebaumsworlddotcom.
>>751969You deserve it for being a psued
>>752111It was a different time, we all were calling everyone gay back then
>>752113It wasn't that different, people still do it
i'm not hanging out with neolibs. thinking brown foreigners are okay to kill is not "woke"
>>752508Most liberals and neoliberals do not think that at all. Also most of them want to kill Russians (defensively) and those are white or white-ish
>>752508Neolibs LOVE immigrants, cheap complasiant (scab sometimes) labour who creates idpol by the mere fact of existing
>>752565yeah totally, obama totally didn't kill thousands of civilians in drone strikes, biden totally didn't defend and deny israeli war crimes. totally bro, totally.
>nb4 it was for the greater goodif you say this or anything like this you are indeed saying it's okay to kill them.
>>752573not mutually exclusive. they like immigrants because immigrants are no longer foreigners and are contributing economically. they don't give a shit about arabs or hispanics if they're not in us soil
>>751760I've said it before but live updating threads is the greatest innovation in recent imageboard history. Just a tremendous idea.
>>752577As a liberal obviously I do not think civilian casualties are acceptable, whether they're intentional or otherwise. Drone strikes are too crude. I hope in the future we'll have much smaller drones that can target and assassinate specific people with absolutely no harm to any other parties.
And I do not like that Biden was too lenient towards Israel, yes. Many liberals feel the Democratic party was/is too deferential and generous to Israel and too willing to overlook their numerous atrocities and failure to prosecute, for example, blatant terrorists and war criminals. Israel routinely operates in contradiction to liberal values.
>>752573Conspiratorial nonsense. Liberals like immigrants because they're not racist and because immigration is generally a big net boon to the economy and, frankly, to society in general.
>>752577>they don't give a shit about arabs or hispanics if they're not in us soilThis is a blind spot for some liberals but there's now been decades of education and exposure of terrible, destructive US foreign policy decisions which most liberals now accept as accurately reported and morally wrong.
Like, look at the recent activity with Venezuela and the Venezuelan boats and capture of Maduro. How many liberals support that? Some, but the vast majority don't. It's not just because Trump is president. If Harris were doing that, most liberals would still oppose it. (Though it's kind of moot because obviously Harris wouldn't have done any of that. At most she'd worsen sanctions, or something.)
The idea that being liberal or pro-capitalism means you must support imperialism, interfering in other countries, killing civilians in other countries is absurd. There's a correlation, but it's not causative. This is I think one of the biggest leftist misunderstandings.
>>751760>Real time typing visibleI didn't realize honey pots could be funny
>>752826>Liberals like immigrants because […] immigration is generally a big net boon to the economyThats what I said retard, they are more exploitable thus porky gets bigger number on his charts
My country is macroeconomically doing well because of immigration but microeconomically it is obviously not
>>752832I got jumped at because they saw what funny things I was typing before posting them :(
>>752835And I am saying you are unintelligent for thinking "better for the economy" = "better for exploitative business owners". You completely lack understanding of economics. Talk to some immigrants themselves, even. Illegal immigration and visas do create increased hazards of exploitation and abuse, but you're reducing it to a childish naive black-and-white which does not actually map to reality. Not all leftists do this, but way too many do.
>>752844Children don't see black and white, adults do.
>>752847Adult children do.
>>752849Adults in general are more inclined to think black and white than children funny enough, especially in senescence
>>752844My parents are immigrants and I have many friends who have immigrants parents and some that are themselves so thanks you very much
It is nor binary thinking to recognize that porky wants to import huge amount of immigrants who will accept shitdog conditions, and this increases the demand for a job
I can't post anywhere, it says something like "this board currently has restrictions" and then reloads the page in a very annoying way
>>752871Well are you woke enough?
It's ugly and illiberal to say but anti immigration= low openness, low intelligence.
>>752826>I do not think civilian casualties are acceptableif they haven't stopped you from enthusiastically glazing obama as the best president ever and wishing he could run for a third term, as every single neolib i've ever met does, then yes, you think they are perfectly acceptable. this isn't a matter of him being the "lesser evil". he's not begrudgingly accepted, he's openly celebrated. if i'm wrong, go ahead and show me the poll saying obama is actually deeply unpopular among libs.
>>752873Yes. Now let me post, I can't even post on /meta/
And I am not joining your piSSKKKord
>>752878That's a liberal thing to say anon
>>752886it's a liberal thing to
think "anti-immigration = low intelligence", but to say it would be vulgar.
liberals don't really go in for serious personality analysis ("low openness"), that's more right-wing coded. (libs do like a good mental-health theory of why rightists are like that, but actually measuring it numerically isn't popular.)
>>752896Tru true, it now makes more sense
>libs do like a good mental-health theory of why rightists are like that, but actually measuring it numerically isn't popularI think that might be a reason why the blackpill is so triggering for libs, they are trying to give numeric values to looks
>>752899Its is mostly triggering because incels package it with misogyny.
>>752879That's reasonable. I might need re-evaluate certain beliefs. Throughout human history, collateral civilian deaths have seemingly been regarded as normal, inevitable, and "the cost of doing business" by most people. In certain cases of war such casualties may be truly unavoidable, but with targeted drone assassinations in foreign operations, there is much less excuse.
He appears to have tried to set up safeguards and reporting requirements, and from what I can tell did want to try to minimize them:
>Obama's approval was required for every strike in Yemen and Somalia, as well as "the more complex and risky strikes in Pakistan" (about one-third of the total as of 2012), and insisted on deciding whether to approve a strike unless the CIA had a "near certainty" that no civilian deaths would result.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_from_the_United_States_drone_strikes#Approvals_of_drone_strikesI don't think Obama was happy about any of the civilian deaths, and he publicly acknowledged them. But, yes, that doesn't make it better. Obama could have halted the drone strike program after the first civilian deaths, but he didn't.
(Trump, of course, removed all those requirements and safeguards shortly after taking office in 2017.)
I would be morally inconsistent if I weren't to consider Obama a war criminal. In a hypothetical third term election he's still going to be better and more moral across the board than Trump and so for pragmatic reasons would have to be backed over Trump in that scenario, but I cannot consider him a good or admirable person for killing at least hundreds of civilians, even if they weren't killed intentionally. (From research, a common upper limit seems to be 900 civilians killed by drone strikes during his terms, but I would not be surprised if it's higher of course.)
So, yes, you do have the truth and the moral high ground on that subject. All human lives have equal value whether they reside domestically or abroad. Most liberals, and most people in general who claim to believe that fact, behave and emote in ways contradictory to that principle. De facto including myself for all of my life, even if through reason I can fully comprehend it is immoral and also possibly illegal under international law.
>>752896>liberals don't really go in for serious personality analysis ("low openness"), that's more right-wing coded.This is another typical hypocritical thesis.
Libs do like to diagnose people based on their political preferences.
Also, liberal doesn’t automatically mean left-leaning. Right wing liberals exist
>>753124>Libs do like to diagnose people based on their political preferences.this is literally in the post itself: liberals will say you're a "sociopath", but they won't say you're "low Agreeableness, low Conscientiousness, and low Neuroticism"
when you expand to include "right wing liberals" the term quickly loses all meaning and, in particular, any sociological distinction with actually-existing libertarianism. (which better incorporates "right wing" liberals because it provides a good way to let them discriminate.)
>>753133>this is literally in the post itself: liberals will say you're a "sociopath", but they won't say you're "low Agreeableness, low Conscientiousness, and low Neuroticism"We must be living on different planets.
Libs do make diagnostic neologisms about people
>>753151big5 isn't new. in any case, you're looking at the surface: what words do they use. not the deeper level: are they actually conducting analysis.
a liberal will give you a thousand neologisms that are all synonyms for being nasty. they will not sit down and plot out the various contributing factors to your nastiness in a phrenological spreadsheet. this (or at least being seen to do this) would run counter to the liberal disposition.
>>753163Except they do do that.
Look at how many hate articles they make about young men just because said demographic disagrees with feminism on a few things.
>>751776Im also part of the image board defence group. It's all secret and behind closed doors. Any info shared in our group stays in the group until we can release a binary or something.
Were working a tool that in theory should work for multiple imageboards.
Unique IPs: 31