Rosa, Gramsci, Trotsky

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options	⛧h=YJUI$]MS&d,Bq:☚~'Wf\9n^7c♆5⛺Xa⚽zkT1rV?_DOu#%l`>w[yHZ0!
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1769727360000.jpeg (120 KB, 1038x1280, IMG_8143.jpeg)

Anonymous 29-01-26 22:56:00 No.752183

Rosa, Gramsci, Trotsky

Anonymous 29-01-26 23:14:05 No.752186

>>752183
If I had to pick it would be Engels, Lenin, Gramsci. But this whole idea of a party is flawed and none of these people would be on my dream team.

Anonymous 29-01-26 23:16:35 No.752189

2x Stalins and one Mao

Anonymous 29-01-26 23:23:59 No.752191

LaSalle, Pavel Axelrod, Kropotkin

Anonymous 29-01-26 23:29:12 No.752192

mao, che, lenin

Anonymous 29-01-26 23:52:57 No.752197

Bordiga and spend the $800 left to feed him lasagna

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:06:19 No.752202

Lenin + Gramsci + Bordiga, theorylets GTFO.

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:10:57 No.752208

5 trotskys (they’ll all disagree with each other and split, thereby creating 5 new revolutionary parties for the price of one)

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:11:57 No.752209

Lenin and stalin, then spend the rest on ice cream

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:29:07 No.752217

engels and lenin are the 2 obligatory ones i dont care what anyone says

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:40:02 No.752223

mao for the praxis
che for the aura
gramsci for the theory

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:43:12 No.752226

>>752202
>Gramsci
What's the use of metaphysical theory?

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:50:10 No.752232

>>752183
Lenin, Mao, Trotsky, uhhh that other $200 guy

Anonymous 30-01-26 00:50:47 No.752233

>>752217
Engels wasn't a revolutionary. We don't need a theorist as much as a stone cold killa.

Anonymous 30-01-26 01:09:17 No.752241

>>752226
Ok, Ill bite, why would you say that about Gramsci?

Glownonymous 30-01-26 01:13:00 No.752246

>treating the communist party as you would an electoral party
>muh great men (and token woman)
embarrassing af thread

Glownonymous 30-01-26 01:17:27 No.752248

>>752241
when gramsci wasnt busy running defense for stalin he was busy endlessly analyzing ideology like the pb cretin he was bc he wasnt even a marxist. he towed the line of the comintern while the italian left maintained its opposition to bolshevization

https://libriincogniti.wordpress.com/2020/05/23/christian-riechers-antonio-gramsci-marxism-in-italy-part-i/

absolutely zero people need gramsci in their lives

Anonymous 30-01-26 01:29:07 No.752252

>>752246
leftists when they see someone having fun

Glownonymous 30-01-26 01:32:37 No.752256

File: 1769736757227.jpg (17.86 KB, 598x554, 1769400632863109.jpg)

>>752241
Gramsci was able to say shit like:

< He [Lenin] and his Bolshevik comrades are convinced that it is possible to actualise socialism at any moment (…) Revolutionary thinking negates time as a factor of progress.’

And still be taken seriously as a communist.

Anonymous 30-01-26 01:37:31 No.752258

>>752246
>>treating the communist party as you would an electoral party
idk how it's doing that?
>>muh great men
That's a flaw of having a party formation vs other organization structures. Individual leaders are actually more important to how things play out if you structure an organization around individual leaders.
>>(and token woman)
I mean…
there's not as many prominent women communists

Tomdatinker 30-01-26 02:02:24 No.752277

I would use the money to buy a gun and force all of those guys at gun point to join my party

Anonymous 30-01-26 02:48:55 No.752318

I choose:
Deng
Lassalle
Bukharin
Trotsky

And keep the $800

Anonymous 30-01-26 03:22:23 No.752324

>>752318
you would get the USA as it currently exists

Unique IPs: 16