>>754695Socialism is a western concept innately antagonistic to dharmic teachings. If you want syncretic western philosophy and economic models with buddhism, you'll have to make syncretic ways for hinduism, jainism, sikhism and so on as well. Which is unecessary because they were never meant to modernize and adapt beyond a caste system, feudalism and monarchism.
There can only be synergy between dharmic teachings and eastern philosophies, never with abrahamism and western philosophies and models. Because socialism will always mean secularism, and your attempts will always be attempts to turn dharmic teachings into secularism, which is to say, you are trying to turn mysticism into secularism, so you are trying to do the impossible and contradictory.
So you are not and will never be buddhist western faggot, you are a lifestylist atheist looking for pretty aesthetics.