i wish libs realize that when i use words like uyghur, pajeet, russian saboteur, etc i'm not actually being racist i'm just using them the same way a normie use "fuck" or "shit". They don't get it despite the fact that i say cracker and cumskin all the time too
You aren’t even intelligent enough to realize the implications of your words.
<*sigh* face the wall
>>755139Ok go to reddit to speak with these liberals about this.
>>755139>Penis >Sex>frog>cryingI would give my comments except I in no way want to be involved with any of you.
>>755160There is nothing outside. Now state your demographic.
>>755160that's funny, fuck is also a vulgar word and if you say that in front a boomer they'd think that you are being an obnoxious asshole for using that word. The point is that words and definition of vulgarity changes man, and its pretty stupid to judge someone just from their usage of words
>>755171Another example: you can call someone a faggot but that doesn't mean that you are homophobic, you can call someone a cunt but that doesn't mean you are a misogynist asshole, you can call someone retarded, braindead, etc. But the moment you say a slur in an ironic way people instantly think that you have to be a racist. P interedasting tbh
>>755172That's a pretty uyghurly way of interpreting that anon. You think that saying words magically makes you a racist; on the other hand i say that words alone mean nothing divorced from the actual person saying the word and the context in which one says that. I am literally closer to Marxian material analysis than you you retarded russian saboteur
>>755174"the actual person" is irrelevant, your inner mental spiritual constellations and interpretations of your actions are irrelevant, that's liberalism.
When you piss into the village well, it doesn't matter whether you're doing it out of malice, as a joke, ironically, or to prove a point, the material outcome is that everyone now has to drink pissy water.
Trvke
>>755178I should add for context, that in my opinión being rude against rightoids should be allowed and promoted, racism is ok when it's used against the bourgeoisie
u can only be weirdly racist and use slurs if ur dropping obscure historical "facts" despite most of the time these history chuds just spouting race propaganda
>>755171>judge someone just from their usage of wordswell that's something you 100% can influence and act on,so huh ?
>>755182yea sorry ur not gonna see me call a black person a uyghur just bc it has some autistic catharsis involved. think with your brain for a minute.
>>755192i mean calling people you dont like slurs IS what marx did tbh
>>755177>breaking social taboo is the same thing as doing a real, material harm to the community.This is why i call you a liberal anon. You might as well compare me saying slurs with a cop beating a black person, completely 0 material analysis
>>755182This is true, the bourgeoisie not only have no country, they have no gender, no race and no sexuality, because being bourgeois allows one to bypass the actual social consequences of marginalization.
Therefore it's impossible to be racist, sexist, or bigoted against a bourgeois, just like it's impossible to be racist against whites & calling someone "crakkker" is not racism
>>755197>breaking social taboo is the same thing asNever said that. You made that up.
Just pointed out that your behavior has concrete, real world "realness" and represents a certain class outlook, and this realness and this outlook have nothing to do with how you imagine yourself to be, but how you act objectively, in both your statements and actions.
>>755205
that's true, but
everything only has existence as it compares to the other
since the bourgeoisie are a monoculture, we might as well just say that
their country is bourgieland (USA)
their gender is bourgie (male rapist)
their race is bourgie (anglo=jew=germanic=nordic)
and their sexuality is bourgeois (pedophilia)
>>755172>It's your responsibility to do better but it isn't my responsibility to give you betterI would actually shoot you lol
>>755200>Therefore it's impossible to be racist, sexist, or bigoted against a bourgeois, just like it's impossible to be racist against whites & calling someone "crakkker" is not racismthis is a pretty inchoate view thoughever. You are diluting individual ethical stances, like being racist or sexist, with causing disproportionate negative impacts on other people, which is ultimately related to class.
It is entirely possible for you to be anti racist but still inflict harm on PoCs if you regularly consumes product made by prison labour. That doesn't make you racist all of a sudden.
On the other end of the spectrum, if i as a third worlder call a first world transgender as a "disgusting trccn", that would still make me transphobic, even if in reality the transgender has more power than me and i cannot inflict any real harm on xer.
>>755211the reality is that the leftoid wants to have it both ways: they want to simultaneously make individual ethical choices like being non racist or non sexist matter, while still maintaining a class analysis of things. But if you view things from a class analysis, then individual ethical choices cease to matter. The only way to resolve this for the leftoid (liboid more like) is to synergize class analysis with individual ethics, as
>>755200 tries to attempt: namely that your ethical stance is inherent to your class status, but this is absolutely false for anyone who has spent more than 5 minutes talking actual, real life people. There are many first worlders who are disgusted by racism (even though they materially benefited from racism) and there are many third worlders who are racist as fuck even though they rarely benefit from it except as a way of sadistic pressure relief, by scapegoating minorities as the reason of why your life is shit.
>>755213of course, i know what Marx said about discrimination: it is a form of alienation that will be resolved when humans take control of production of social life. But there is that, and there is "if you are hateful then you are a bourg and if you are tolerant then you are prole" typa thinking some anons here held
>>755177trvth nvke to end all edgy pseud arguments
>>755182Critical support to my Fox News Grandpas tirade about Obama's "UYGHUR MUSLIM AGENDA"
>>755209made up shit nobody said award
I still think that slurs should be discouraged because they desensitize people to actual discrimination
People want racial slurs to be destigmatized but still think loli shota is le bad
>>755297The real problem with slurs is that people only care about slurs when kids use them.
Adults using them endlessly is considered a non-problem
>>755211the proper way to square this circle is to understand that there's multiple classes, not just economic ones, and that people occupy different positions within those interrelated classes
so a racialized person can't be racist towards a whitoid
but a racialized cishet person can be transphobic towards a transgender whitoid, because although the trans whitoid is above the racialized cishet in the context of ethnic class, the racialized cishet has class privilege over the white trans in the context of gender class
>>755139Good lord your stupid. Slurs aren't the same as fuck or shit. Fuckovia or Shitistan isn't a real place or people.
>>755332>racialized cishet has privilege over white transuygha, do you seriously believe that a pakistani cishet has any privilege whatsoever over a white trans, or even over a white homosexual? this multisectionality shit is the dumbest and laziest liboid copout in history
>>755414let me give you another example. Men in abstract has more power than gay men. We, however, overlook Hamas or other national liberation struggles being homophobic, precisely because the colonial oppression is much greater than oppression between straight and gay. And if we can overlook homophobia, then there is no reason why we cannot overlook transphobia
Unique IPs: 22