>christoids actually believe this shit
what you must understand is that they think other people should suffer, either as an end in itself (common Republican trait) or because it helps uphold their aesthetic sensibilities (They don't like the idea of abortion and find that hard to ignore, but they're indifferent on the margin to women being raped).
this is much more fundamental than any ad-hoc faith based justification that follows. (this is why Todd Akin comes up with an insane way of not confronting the problem by handwaving it, because although it's nonsense it's far less horrifying than alternatives like Richard Mourdock's "god wanted you to get raped")
the exception, of course, is that 90% of the time if they impregnate someone and don't want the kid, they'll jump the queue at the abortion clinic faster than you can say immaculate conception, because they don't seriously believe they'll face any divine retribution for this sort of thing. if they really, really truly believe in god, they'll quickly rediscover the kind and forgiving god of the new testament.
it should, for balance reasons, be noted that pro-Abortion types naturally like to debate "what do you do in the case of rape?" because many of them would quietly be uncomfortable with someone doing what right-wingers imagine, going and getting abortion after abortion after abortion because they don't want to use contraception. This is much less stupid and evil, but it's a similar phenomenon of people starting with the conclusion (abortion should be legal and accessible) and then working back to it. (abortion should be legal and accessible… for the benefit of rape victims [and everyone else, unitemized])