Socialism cannot exist in one nation. It's worldwide or bust.
I think I trust comrade Stalin more than a misogynistic avatarfag.
>>757347Or should I say, the Great Helmsman Stalin.
>>757349Sorry if I am mistaken, but I remember you making incel-core threads like a year ago.
socialism is the only mode of production where such unrealistic demands are said.
feudalism didn't wait for every slave society to collapse,capitalism itself sprouted out in different countries multiple times (and the HORROR ! they were doing capitalism in one nation !)before it became a worldwide fact.
also what those that slogan means for like the october revolution (or any potential future one),Lenin should have laid down his arms and cozy up to the mensheviks into a liberal democracy after the german communists died ?
>>757354 don't you dare defame mugiwara boy
>>757363 i don't think mugiwara boy means that you gotta do it all at once, but that you gotta keep expanding until it's worldwide
>>757354I used to be the BPD poster and sometimes I complain about how women are hypergamistic, but I don't hate ALL women. In fact since i got a full time job 5 years ago and started talking to women irl i've realized very few are actually like that.
>>757365This
>>757365well considering expanding militarily is impossible in a world with nukes,gg I guess (tbh I'm of the opinion that if the CIA can coup a country into neoliberalism,I don't fucking understand why the KGB NEVER did it)
>>757371What? We're balls deep back to the age of military expansionism (we probably never left), what with the US taking over Venezuela, and Russia attempting to take over Ukraine and kinda succeeding(?), and Israel continuing to take Palestine territory. I guess nations decided to ignore nukes and to expand anyway since nobody wants to actually use nukes and exterminate humanity in a nuclear war…
>>757378you cited zero socialist countries,and you also didn't remark the obvious : only countries with nukes are allowed to do it,to those that don't have them,and if the point is to expand communism globally,you are inevitably going to face those,which you cannot attack directly
>>757371this is why i think communism is genuinely impossible in the 21st century. we had a brief window of opportunity in the 1800s but its all gone now. even if there werent any nukes the average prole is too passive to do anything, we cant even have basic social democracy anymore
>>757380we're going back to some sort of world order like the Middle Ages. All the propaganda and psyops has already turned poeple schizophrenic and retarted.
during those times peasants didn't have the consciousness or ability to start mass revolts or seize power. they just had to accept their lot in life. resist in quiet ways like poaching the lord's pheasant. or go insane. which is why people died in dancing plagues where they danced themselves to death.
>hes not a Cosmo-commynist
just space globalists. wont even help the Periphery and their global revolutions smh
>>757384Soviet Power + Electrification of the Whole Country