[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1771472030871.png (208.08 KB, 750x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Materially speaking, I wasn't born a Chad, so it's over for me

File: 1771473148448.png (208.08 KB, 750x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

Women don't love me because I don't look good enough

kill yourself then, if it's so over

I just watched TAFS episode with clavicular and who the industry plant is this guy
And what is goonmaxing jestergooning lookism?

Looking doesn't apply to cishet men.
Get a job and make money and you will find a gf.

>>759622
Yes it does stop lying

It's real, but unless you're unlucky enough to be outright ugly it's not hard to overcome. Average looking people hook up all the time, and if you're salty you can't get a hotty, then just get over it.
Also, romantic relationships aren't neccesary for a fulfilling life.

>>759622
Looks do apply for straight men.
Just not the same way as for women.

If looksim wasn't a factor of male value, then men wouldn't be guilt tripped into gym-maxxing

>>759707
Men are expected to have visibly muscular bodies with well defined facial features. While women are expected be curvy in the buttocks and breasts but skinny in the waist with softer features than a male in skin and face.

>>759707
>>759711
>gym
>muscles
This is all male gaze oriented. Only homosexuals and a vanishingly tiny niche of women like the bodybuilder aesthetic.

>>759706
> romantic relationships aren't neccesary for a fulfilling life
Wrong.

File: 1771526785307.png (14.18 KB, 191x255, ClipboardImage.png)

Materially speaking the trccns have won. The future is inevitable.

>>759740
>This is all male gaze oriented. Only homosexuals and a vanishingly tiny niche of women like the bodybuilder aesthetic.


I'm not talking about roided out jock look. Women do like men with muscle tone, but not excessive.

>Wrong


If that's true, why do so many adults often end up divorced and/or on drugs or often have estranged kids?

File: 1771530167693.jpg (19.17 KB, 370x302, 1607021904040-jenk.jpg)

>>759740
>Wrong.
The fuck's a protestant doing here?

File: 1771530249908.png (29.36 KB, 890x681, IMG_0137.png)

today i was standing in line and i saw an advertisement with a pretty woman on it. i thought about how i would feel if i were placed in a social situation with her, and at first my mind placed us in two different spheres of the social world, due to our looks. this is the standard social programming that has been pumped into our minds as children, that looks determine a large part of your status. then i thought to myself, “wait a second, if i’m in a social situation with a pretty woman, but i don’t know anything about her, then what at all do her looks matter to me? i dont see her as a just an object, something i use to extract some sort of utility or to satiate an urge. i don’t know her, i don’t know if we have anything in common.”

men are socialized to see women as objects, sexual or otherwise. i understand that this is a cliche, but it’s still true. we don’t see women as people, and once you mature and try to understand this then you will understand completely how people actually socialize and and up as friends or partners. this is your problem, you likely have autism and/or you have trouble empathizing with others. it is not your looks that get in the way, it is the barriers that you create that block your access to making friends and finding a partner.

>>759527
This is not exactly my problem.

>>759762
>men are socialized to see women as objects, sexual or otherwise. i understand that this is a cliche, but it’s still true. we don’t see women as people, and once you mature and try to understand this then you will understand completely how people actually socialize and and up as friends or partners. this is your problem, you likely have autism and/or you have trouble empathizing with others. it is not your looks that get in the way, it is the barriers that you create that block your access to making friends and finding a partner.


You’re forgetting that men are seen as objects as well. They’re only valued if they can “save the day”.

Also you’re wrong that looks don’t matter. I know a lot of people whom are not misogynistic yet they end up with nobody

File: 1771535887661.jpg (200.62 KB, 1080x570, life as a man.jpg)


>>759788
lmao

if men can easily do any of this there wouldn't be any talks of lonely men or how dating and romance feels like appeasing women, and "getting a middle class job" is said like you won't be pushing your resumé from place to place until somone decides you're worthy

File: 1771537307866.png (1.16 MB, 1337x1158, ClipboardImage.png)

looksmaxxing as it blew today is just what we used to call metrosexuals and preppies back then, but on steroids, literally, somehow the subculture went from maximizing your looks, to get a plastic surgery and shoot roids, and if you're 5'5 its over kill yourself because every woman mentally spits on you

File: 1771537684832.png (208.08 KB, 750x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

Leftist males would rather feed themselves sweet little lies rather than yield to the brutal truth of the social-sexual darwinism

File: 1771537904497.png (208.08 KB, 750x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

They even created this.. "meme" of a rightwinger which, despite their avoidance of lookism, has ironically proved it true

File: 1771538280990.png (68.37 KB, 450x450, ClipboardImage.png)

Honestly is there anything any of you are even right about? You're just a bunch of liars about nearly everything aside from, maybe, revolution for a better world.

I wonder if you all larp as leftists because it's easier to get pussy that way. Just the way it sounds, the idealism of itall, would reel in most women.. It's no wonder you get more sex, although that doesn't necessarily mean its true.

>>759788
This is a troll post. Either that or it's a sheltered femcel

>>759761
The modern world is Protestant.
Also, it was Protestants who promoted romantic love as necessary for adulthood

The problem is they wanna gatekeep sex and romance, calling all forms of sexual fetish they don't like as "predatory"

>>759808
>The modern world is Protestant.
>Also, it was Protestants who promoted romantic love as necessary for adulthood
Yes, this was my point.
>>759808
>The problem is they wanna gatekeep sex and romance, calling all forms of sexual fetish they don't like as "predatory"
Romance is a kink too, and you're right. They do.

>>759527
As a non-white; non-Chad–what is to be done?

…other than suicide.

And yet somehow the world population has reached 9 billion. Throughout history tens of billions of people have managed to fuck. You can also find someone to fuck, you just have to settle with an uggo or a poor or something

>>760649
The human population is nine billion?
That’s too many.
Also, you’re forgetting that mortality is high in a lot of world regions. The birth rates is merely replacing the dead ones

There is an extremely high chance that you will be able to find a women who loves you and whom you can really love back in a spiritual/personal level. But its not guaranteed that they will be attractive. Most likely they will be mid or ugly.

That's the reality. Deal with it. Find a woman and make communist babies.

>>760655
The problem may not be looks.
The problem is a lot of them are already sexually and mentally tainted from previous relationships. They may not be able appreciate you efficiently.

>>759845
Damn. There's no solutions then.

>>760659
I know from experience that past relationships can make a person much more likely to appreciate people that they wouldn't initially have.

>>760714
Those people's "appreciation" don't mean shit.
It's just picking up damaged goods.

They just want to save face

>>760659
>They may not be able appreciate you efficiently.
what does this even mean, like yeah duh every relationship has emotional baggage and part of growing both as a partner and as a person is learning to deal with it. you have it too, after like 20-30 years of living you probably have a bunch of really intolerable quirks and insecurities.

>>760817
Would you like to live with a single mom whose kids have three different fathers and is on drugs and has a gambling habit?

>>760817
That’s why people choose to spend their time with as few partners as possible. Having to start over with new partners is too messy.
Always being compared to previous partners, dealing with kids with from previous relationships, etc


Unique IPs: 23

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]