If you ask me the answer is yes and no. Yes because you should never rip the flesh of a babies dick off without going to jail for child abuse but no because once that babies is 21 he can do what he wants.
The thing is though that it is really hard to oppose infant-circumcision without coming across as antisemitic because there are genuinely a ton of rightoids who oppose circumcision for the wrong reasons, and I never opposed it publicly before because I was never circumcised (Shout outs to my Mom for standing up to my Catholic great-Aunts and Uncles) so I don't even have an excuse. I still oppose it though because I know first hand the benefits of having foreskin, like I get why it is in the Bible because if you are an ancient Israelite in the desert and there is a sand-storm you don't wanna pull it back every time a grain of sand flies up your robes but we live in the age of showers now and all of that stuff and the bacteria that everyone uses as an excuse now just washes off. Also you can goon without lube because the head is always moist! However that is a downside though because since it has always been so protected it is really fragile, but that is the only real downside. It also annoys me that the same people who defend Circumcision are the same guys who oppose abortion because Circumcision happens after the baby is born and not when it is a clump of cells!
>>762297>once that babies is 21 its 11:40 give me a break on the typos
I think it should be illegal, FGM is illegal and its religious (kinda)but we still tell the ethnic and religious people who want to do this, that they cant
Jewish organizations know how to lobby
Look up how they acted when iceland passed a law
>>762297Logically it should be illegal cause consent and all that. Practically stamping out such practices are very tricky unfortunately, because people are absolute freaks about religious shit and will start doing it underground, improperly, with limited training in a back alley as soon as you ban it. Which of course results in all kinds of nasty issues. It's probably better to promote education and secularism to actually reduce the practice.
>>762297>>Should Circumcision be illegal? yes, and by extension any religion that commands it
Circumcising should be illegal
These same people who promote circumcision are against cognizant prime age humans deciding to switch their gender
>>762298I thought 18 is the age of legal autonomy?