[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1773183698946-0.jpeg (730.45 KB, 828x1064, IMG_4335.jpeg)

File: 1773183698946-1.jpeg (676.56 KB, 1273x828, IMG_4334.jpeg)

 

The fact that this book even caused so much outrage against black Americans despite it not being written by one or for them is revealing over how bad reading comprehension in the United States is 🙄

i think most people just read book titles and make up their minds

>>765371
This screenshot was on the third page too😭. I really want to believe that the average American is neither that stupid or has an attention span that small

>>765370
>The fact that this book even caused so much outrage against black Americans despite it not being written by one or for them is revealing
I think she proved her thesis correct.

it was a popular topic in american renaissance lol

It’s not about reading comprehension being bad it’s the lexical association with phrases like “white fragility “ that makes people assume that it’s made by some black power activist

>>765372
It’s not a matter of “Americans are stupid”.
It’s just that the preface is too easily forgotten because it’s another book about race relations

transhumanist book, this is the book BNWO transhumanists like to plap to.

Reading Norman Finkelstein demolish DiAngelo in his Burning that Bridge made me laugh like a insane person.

File: 1773208998860.png (754.06 KB, 1200x824, fellowworkers.png)

>>765370
>this book even caused so much outrage against black Americans
it caused outrage against crackers like robin diangelo who went on speaking tours making 75k from massive corporations and pushing hair trigger nonsense that got people fired for being slightly edgy on lunch break

File: 1773209269100.png (34.68 KB, 948x78, ClipboardImage.png)

also crackers aren't fragile, they genocide and enslave. diangelo is trying to have it both ways. get edgy working class crackers fired for saying pow wow and gyp and other terms they didnt know were racist, while simultaneously being a bourgeois zionist cracker who turns palestinian children into dust. for a corporate cracker like diangelo, saying the soft a nygha is more offensive than turning a school full of muslim children into ash.

Reading comprehension is supposed to be fucked within gen Alpha populations. The future of the world is pretty much cursed.

>>765422
>muh perspective

Probably the only one here who read the book. It was quite insightful. It was just about how whites have a tendency of shutting down conversations about race in various ways because they feel uncomfortable about it and various other cognitive dissonance kind of phenomena of how whites are racist while denying racism exists. Pity most people didn’t make it part the title but the butthurt was entertaining.

File: 1773238816531-0.png (394.8 KB, 860x424, ClipboardImage.png)

>>765370
>bad reading comprehension
You aren't incorrect about that, but you're also a fucking twit. Poor reading comprehension or not, the general understanding of what this book is, wasn't incorrect; it's radlib trash. It reads like a long-winded post from some succ-dem subreddit.

>American wealth was built on the labor kidnapped and enslaved Africans and their descendants

It took nearly half a century for black slaves to become a part of the American-colonial economy because the first ones fucking died and were poorly suited to life in the colonies. Press-ganged whites and Irish were the primary exploited work force, and this remained so in the North up through the early 20th century. There were even early-colonial uprisings in Virginia by these indentured servants and colonized Native Americans. Furthermore the majority of the American industrial economy was built in the North, where slave labor was much less important to the economy, and was almost nonexistent in the Mid-West.
>Women were denied the right to vote until 1920
>black women were denied that right until 1964
>We have yet to achieve our founding principle, but any gains (made) thus far have come through identity politics
What a load of utter liberal horse-shit. Women were granted voting rights because the USSR did and it was one of the societal concessions granted in the US for fear of proletarian revolt. As the saying goes, "If voting could change anything it would be made illegal!”*
The African-American rights movement gained ground because of (again) the USSR and it's activity in anti-racism as well as the broader societal unrest of the 1960s. Additionally the Black Panthers and MLK both emphasized not racial change but societal change for PROLETARIANS to unite and be equal.
Identity Politics was never the basis of these efforts. The specific racial identity in play was merely a specific facet of a broader proletarian struggle, not idpol.

>pic

*Article from 24 Sep 1976 The Sun (Lowell, MA) First confirmed use of the quote on voting.

So anyway, TL;DR: But this entire 'book' is based on liberal mindset about race and racial position in the United States. On a functional, real level racism is not systemic in the USA. Blacks live the same as whites and with roughly the same proportionality of class. There's a small population out of the overall population and is reflected in every class level. Just like whites, the majority of the population, most blacks are at the poverty line or below, and functionally live no differently regardless of race


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]