Lowkey hate myself for it, tried to like women, but I literally can't. I'm not even based, I'm a sub bottom. Is it over for me?
>>768248mods banish this faggot to /lgbt/
what are you a strasserist or a gay-falangist
>>768248You just need to find yourself a brutal femdom Queen, King
>>768251National Syndicalist
>>768252I find women ontologically unattractive
>>768253>National Syndicalistwhat nation
>>768254Trans men dommy mommy (male) then. The possibilities are endless the world is your oyester!
He could ride your dick but in a dom way!
>>768248>Is it over for me?In what sense?
What is even the point of this thread? Should we understand you being attracted to males as an undesirable thing or something?
>>768248daring today, aren't we
>>768253You're just a regular stalinist
>>768268The republicans made the wrong choice, had they gone with the fascists instead of the anarchists - anarchism today would be cleaner of natlib aspirations and not the compromising massively popular frontist class collaborationist movement it has spiraled into. Anarchism would've likely become something more akin to an ultras position. Sublime and free of sin.
Are you spanish? Can we date? I am from here too
>>768277—–BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK—–
mDMEacDgtxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAXJNjWRrseTYoI7ynWqJOQVbTia6ORq+AP0bM
rIuNODa0Cm5vbWJyZSA8ID6IcQQTFggAGgQLCQgHAhUIAhYBAhkBBYJpwOC3Ap4B
ApsDAAoJEBPlfC44RVzQxFgA9A67RcZFdyCvw4INbgUEwm75ZIpJoueMO1N0+M3S
sO4BAPajRURsqeMCSueirrjrS+fdey0IMw84DgJp5hMcppYOuDgEacDgtxIKKwYB
BAGXVQEFAQEHQKihJsB98DP079Y6MyGAzCHmF1jFdwj6JQsLR/HjogNZAwEIB4hh
BBgWCAAJBYJpwOC3ApsMAAoJEBPlfC44RVzQ/ZEA/11YcQDKlE197tjMqHaAG3xW
Qk1vrtjJdAiMrEchnd5jAP0RcziOXCLrF5faQ2/wQizGIOVuRWiYa5b5ANbmFSgF
Cw==
=NsmS
—–END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK—–
>>768279>>768277Post about your wedding later you two
Normal third positionist
>>768290Oh, the key is mine, I posted it so he can send me his contact info encrypted (if he wanrs we could also meet at libera, but not right now)
He posted that at 6am (in spain) and i doubt you wake up early to post this type of things so i assume he is sleeping
I hope sometimes comes out of this, he won't probably have a best offer, all the other homos in spain are superliberal and antifascists
>>768303That's why I wrote post about your wedding later you two, but seeing how you treat relationships as transactions / "offers" it seems like you're just a whore, so I guess there won't be a wedding for a match made in leftypol after all…
So much for the "traditional values"!
>>768304>traditional valuesWho said anything about this? I am not a fascist/LARPer
>you're just a whoreFalse, I don't have sex and I can't find a bf
And "offer" mean a candidate
>>768305So you were larping as natsynd after all
>>768274>>768277You talking to me? No. Ive been all over Spain and I have family in Cataluyna. I'm not gay.
>>768306I am not OP
>>768307I was talking to OP
Pq no me respondes, no estas interesado? Era bait? Yo aceptaré todas tus facetas y te amaré con todo mi corazón… Donde más vas a encontrar éso alguien con tu sexualidad y creencias?
>>768304>but seeing how you treat relationships as transactions / "offers"When we speak about a relationship between two things, it is purely a judgement over a sensuous knowledge captured by our mind, and whether the criterions we based our judgement on are themselves deemed true(in a paradoxical way) or if the sensuous knowledge we captured has any correlation what was truthfully there seemingly remains an uncertainty.
This applies for our fantasy of 'love' , and if it really is a definite quality of smth, a special kind of co-dependence, in inquiries to prove our judgement, we'll find ourselves constantly relating love to other things but never exploring love independently , "they look very pleased of being in presence of each other- there must be love!"
Nevertheless, love is smth abstract, even though the fantasy of love when you think of someone perhaps is still felt in a way.
So, I am unsure if you can really say that love is 'impossible' under x,y,z conditions ( as ex. when their begins as a transaction or just an empty, sexual rite ), we also see many tragic ends where love loses its dominion and seperation takes over ( increasing divorce rates ).
There is a story of a man, who is used to carnal pleasures, and in the cycle, again he is engaging in it. But this time, something new emerged in him, a bitter disgust, why was he spending his time focussed on the sensations in his crotch, where in front of his eyes there stood a beauty, he looked sentimentally, he felt dirty and stained, as if he lost his chance to reach out to them and unite way before, as if he wasted his time in the sexual rite, as if he had nothing special to offer them, even his body was offered to many.
After all, in rare instances, a 'w' word may also experience something someone may define it as 'love'.
>>768268Fuck the Carlists and fuck Franco.
>>768248first off sub bottoms are the biggest threat to patriarchy in the lgbtiqiaa2s+ movement. we turn every role that is for "men" on its head. It's inherently radical
Also, why the fuck are you a third positionist? Shit ideology
>>768263I mean the entire concept of sexuality-as-identity is bourgeois.
>>768361The patriarchy is already dissolved basically. 'Progress' is indistinguishable from the process of capital.
>>768363>'Progress' is indistinguishable from the process of capital.wow, someone who actually reads marx 🙉
>>768254women are halfway between children and men, which gives them essential impurity. freud was right by identifying the vagina as a castrated phallus.
Get off the computer and find a job you fucking loser.
>>768339i would advise you investigate the platonic conception of love (such as in "lysis"), or mentorship in "symposium" (which he compares to pederasty). the purest love is friendship (as aristotle re-states), since it is unconditional, while romance is easily corrupted. further, on the form of love itself, i would refer to "euthyphro" where plato discusses the form of justice by means of participation and cause. to relate it to love, love (as subject) must precede its object for it to be so caused in its attraction. this then makes desire a desiring for itself (e.g. fantasy), which relates to lacan's notion of transcendental desire. so then, love in itself must be loving, for us to love another. what is loved may only participate in love, so cannot be its cause. this gives unconditionality to love, which then allows for any series of attachment. at the same time however, we see plato put eros as the generative source of all things, libidinising love, and so steering it to certain ends. the distinction between the modes of the erotic then define love differently, which facilitates friendship as superior to romance, but both partaking of the same essence.
tl;dr "bros before hoes"
>>768372I do have one. I'm a researcher in mathematics lol.
>>768359Why are you using a falangist flag then? Fucking KYS RETARDED YANK. The yanks have done so much damage to Spain and yet you are here mocking us
>3rd position
>not becoming a 5th positionist
>>768391Spain is not part of Europe. We are our own tectonic plate and for lots of centuries "europe" have not given a shit about us
>>768390Sorry I am butthurted you are not spanish and you have ignored my love proposals
>>768395I was sleeping and had class all morning. Sorry…
>>768398I wouldn't date a yank anyway, a nationalistic one much less. But I forgive you
>>768399Can't be a nationalist for the current US. It's a degenerate pig state swarmed with low-church protestants.
>>768400What do you think of the Cuban war? I am happy they got independence but not with USA role on it
>>768401Not a fan of any US imperialism.
>>768402Have you ever tried dating women (not liking them)?
>>768389the issue is that they dont have any idea what exactly the thing is which is "progressing", so it becomes a synonym for "good" and so one's interests align with capital (i.e. "i support current thing"). marx's point on progress is that the dynamism of bourgeois capital revolutionises the relations of society, by destroying private property, the family, etc.
in his political economy, he draws out the way in which the "concept" of capital spiritualises labour as substance become subject - effectively criticising hegel's historicism as limited to a capitalist myth, which i briefly discuss here:
>>>/leftypol/2748590what we call "history" then is labour turned against labour by the conflict of private property, most understood by the opening words of the manifesto. "progress" then, is just the intensifying of capital, while communism as he puts it, is a negation of this negation, which thus gives man positive self-determination (e.g. man-as-man). progress ceases, since the movement is complete.
>>768403Yes, did not enjoy it.
>>768405Are you an atheist or catholic?
>>768407Was raised Catholic. My father is Jewish (was ironically the one who wanted me to get baptized), and my mother is Catholic. I would say I'm a Spinozist.
>>768409Wow, a jewish homosexual natsynd. What is your opinion on jews? Do you hate the jewish proletariat?
If you live in the US you probably have at least a chance to get a boyfriend
>>768378Thx anon. It was an interesting read.
I assume you were the anon who used to use nazi flag in ur posts back then, glad to see you still posting. (and abondoned the flag xD)
Obviously I am not that well-read compared to you, it would be like comparing the silent weight of the night to a brief howl of the wind~ I personally do not have much tales to tell in front of the pantheon after my demise, gods may be bored.
Though, in the investigation of concepts like love or other valuations, there is a passive-nihilistic urge in me while thinking. When someone explains a phenomenon subjected to a logical system/method, even if it feels like it makes sense, I still keep thinking why it must be true even if the thing x that we related to it is fullfilled. Like asking why again to the answer of why. In abstract love also seems very vulnerable, everything once held dear may be erased by some advanced neural manipulation device or something, yet we still wish it to be eternal.
>>768383is it even possible to get a more gay job kek
>>768413love is obviously mammalian; it begins by the parasitism of a child in the mother's womb, which demands resources. the mother gives birth and the crying child continues to suckle at the breast. after this, the child begs for attention and affection, always jealous and afraid that they are not loved enough.
for most young lovers it is a similar dynamic; possessiveness, jealousy, over-affection, co-dependence. infantile sexuality creates fantasies of "mummy" and "daddy" in the bedroom, fulfilling perverse wishes of emotional completion. hugging, kissing, holding hands - these are things parents do with children, and what is continued by lovers. this then suffices as a genaeology of romance.
we see then that the two primary loves; family and lovers, are connected by indirect continuity, while friendship must exist apart from these. indeed, a friend is kin, by choice, rather than circumstance. we owe loyalty to our family for the sake of honour, but we owe loyalty to friends for its own sake. we also choose our lovers, yet loyalty is contracted by ceremonies such as marriage, as a pledge of public trust, while friendship requires no such constitution, since it is pure. a lover, further, is "attractive" to us by appearance, while a friend is attractive by essence. we have another kin relationship however, in pets, who are more like family than friends or lovers.
so then, love exists between kin. kin consists of family, lovers and friends. family and lovers are impure forms of love, while friendship is the purest. we may again refer to plato, in seeing that mentorship is a form of loving union, but in the mind (the same as socrates' "midwifery" of men's minds). so then, are friends adequately understood as "soul mates" while lovers can be seen as mates of flesh? further, some friends induct themselves into family, calling a friend "brother" or elsewise. is a friend then kin by being adopted family? either way, all kin co-relate by a union of love.
>>768411The Jewish community, especially the seculars/reform/conservatives, are subversive in the sense that they prioritize their nation over the current nation-state they're living in- it's incredibly apparent from their reaction to the Palestine issue, as they're 'progressive' (in that they tow the current bourgeois-academic consensus on social issues) on every other subject. They frequently will critique white people about having in-group biases, while supporting their ethnostate in the Levant. Some of the more brazen conservative Jews will shape foreign policy via 'Judeo-Christianity' in order to make Christians believe that their enemy is Islam. There's a lot more I could mention, but in summary, I hate these types of Jews.
When it comes to orthodox Jews, I could care less. The Talmud is pretty interesting, along with Jewish theology.
>>768418Probably being a journo o algo
Being gay isn't a mental ilness being a straggot that worships foids is
>>768438mmm ok, it was just to see if you are of the type of "jews are ontologically evil"
Have you tried to find a bf? How has gone it so far?
>>768248I don't understand gay men that try to be straight, it's hell out here.
you can go into grindr right now and get fucked by a dude way avobe your looks in a minute, I go to tinder looking for pussy as a tall handsome men and have to fight for a scrap of mid pussy, gays have gay privilege, use that shit.
>>768447>you can go into grindr right now and get fucked by a dude way avobe your looks in a minuteWrong. I have been rejected by multiple guys my age on Grindr, my only possibilty was older/creepy men
>>768447Yeah but hookups are unfulfilling as fuck. Many gay men have foid interests as well, so even dating is annoying.
>>768446>Have you tried to find a bf? How has gone it so far?Not very well. I use hinge (I stopped using Grindr a while ago), but so many people just don't have any similar interests to me at all.
>>768456>hookups are unfulfilling as fuckAlso dangerous, STDs are easy to get…
Why do you reply to one post at a time?
>>768460Hinge? Do you seriously believe you will find your love on dating apps? Full of normies? Haven't you had luck with /soc/?
>>768248I always thought being gay was a prerequisite for turd positon
>>768272>The republicans made the wrong choice, had they gone with the fascists instead of the anarchists - anarchism today would be cleaner of natlib aspirations and not the compromising massively popular frontist class collaborationist movement it has spiraled into.Lluis Companys literally bombed the CNT and attempted to make a pact with ᴉuᴉlossnW. Everybody knows the revolution was crushed by the republicans in 37 with the assistance of the CNT leadership themselves. Read Augustin Guillamon.
>Anarchism would've likely become something more akin to an ultras position. Sublime and free of sin.There were some who were for a small time
>>768461>Haven't you had luck with /soc/?Never heard of that lol
>>768466I assumed you had used 4chan at some point. Can some be aware of the existence of leftypol without having used 4chan? Specially if a chud?
>>768469Nah I didn't become a chud because of social media or anything.
>>768404>>768389Not necessarily. Progress can be against interest of capital, especially in ALL environmental causes. Even basic things like home gardening threaten the flow of capital if enough people are growing food instead of buying it, riding bikes instead of cars, etc.
>>768469I found it the reverse way, through Bunkermag and then Bunkerchan and now Leftypol. But I think I'm the extreme minority.
>>768470Mmm, okay. Then /soc/ is 4chan's socializing board, you will have to use pi$$cord tho, since everyone there uses it. There are some smart people from now and then that give a signal/telegram contact info but most of them don't
>>768465"Nosotros no somos los guardianes del
marxismo, estamos aquí en vía de aprender más"
We are not the guardians of Marxism; we are here to learn more.
Make those stagnated crypto Zionists seeth!
>>768484Illegalists are usually Ego-chads that don't do spooks
>>768254Have you tried forcefully masturbating to straight porn? Maybe eventually you could be pseudo-aroused by women
>>768490this is more bent than just being gay. i think they should just let themselves be a faggot
>>768383Oh okay that's pretty based mb
>>768491>themselvesIs this homosexual third-positionist nb or what?
I was just giving a tip anyways, he would pobably life better if he was straight, his natsynd peers will always look at him as a mental disordered person
Unique IPs: 28