How would a communist world solve the incel problem. The whole incel problem would get even worse because women would have zero need to even settle down with a beta for survival. They would just fuck Chad and carry his baby while the state supports women.
>>769079I would just shoot them all. Every single self-describred incel I would shoot them dead because the provide no use to me and only potential uses to the enemy. So I will unceremoniously kill all of you.
But of course, you could all stop being unfuckable faggots. It's that easy. But otherwise I might have to do things to you.
>>769081>>769080Stop coping. It's 2026, red pill ideology is now widely accepted. There's even a subreddit called Red Pilled WOMEN where they talk about the exact same things that incels have been describing for the past 20 years.
Like you literally have women talking about how they became alpha widows and are having trouble bonding with beta men.
>>769082What in the fuck are you talking about LMAO?
God, I don't want anything to do with any of you, but I have devices that will put your brain matter on the ground.
Terrible fucking thread but I'll entertain it
>everyone is in the same class and around the same "income" bracket so dating pool is larger for everyone
>media is not white supremacist nor black fetishist and a multitude of ethnicities see healthy representation therefore they're all seen as attractive
>more public hangout spaces since childhood, people are more sociable and everyone develops social skills, you keep meeting new people even after highschool/college
>less working hours, more time to socialize
>less stranger danger
AThere would be no betas, theyd all turn into alphas
>>769080>>769081>>769084Are you a woman? The irrational genocidal hatred you're showing towards me is the natural hatred you have of (perceived) dysgenic individuals like me rather than some kind of self righteous moral hatred towards incels.
You are disguising your biological disgust and attempting to make it both socially acceptable and personally digestible by pretending its moral outrage instead.
>>769086Yeah the material conditions would be much better for self-actualization. "Betas" exist because they're being held back.
>>769088Little faggot transhumanist bitch, I don't give a fuck who you are. You are an absolute nobody and nothing. Nobody would care if u you died in child-birth or at any point upon your sorry life. Everyone would be rather relieved because you are a disgusting abomination.,
I'm sorry if I made any of you freaks literally KYS tonight.
How bow dah? Useless fags?
At least you can do is lick my scrotum on your face.
>>769082>my ideology is true because a bunch of incels larp as redpilled women on a subreddittouch grass nygha damn
>>769095i think you mistyped, you meant uygha, we don't use ethnic slurs here
>>769080>>769081Cope, killing incels does not remove dysgenic women from the population and so incels will continue to exist
>>769079OP are you retarded? What’s up with you guys confusing pop culture logic with real world logic?
Under communism inceldom would be a non issue because men wouldn’t need to throw away their self value for female attention
Personally, I would turn them gay
>>769459conversion therapy but for real this time. Prisons may be abolished, but we're going to parlay 'gulag gay' into just 'gay'
>>769463Inceldom has cishomo and trans patrons as well. If anything you’re just shifting the demographic
Get rid of social media so women can't engage in hypergamy
>>769085>more public hangout spaces since childhood, people are more sociable and everyone develops social skills, you keep meeting new people even after highschool/college>less working hours, more time to socialize>less stranger dangerLol this is such a cope
Normies manage to "develope" social skills just fine with the current setup
If anything, having such a large emphasis on socialization would just make normies even beter at socializing compared to incels
Social "skills" arent something you learn,they are inate
You could do everything "correct" and still be offputting if it isnt something that is natural to you
moid genocide of course
>>769501This post s cope
.
Normies are doing fine relative to what the curretert up allows.
And it ain't much.
>>769079Read Assemblywomen by Aristophanes.
Ancient utopian communists already figured out how to solve incel(and femcel) crisis
>>769503people say this but then condemn me when i say that we need to pit excess moids in a deathmatch and then give the winner a free fuck for all ticket
>>769517Then what about excess women?
You forget that not all women are born nor remain attractive.
>>769517You're dehumanizing men as toys for wornen.
That men are only valuable if they have a partner
>>769514This should close the thread tbh
There's an incel problem?
>>769543There's not enough of them.
The incel problem will be solved when the world blows up also solving every other problem. So find a way to blow the world up.
>>769561>chad will resent the lawchads already fuck ugly women, to them its a novelty experience they dont really mind
Also you are incapable of being funny
>>769574>as a noveltyyeah, but there's a difference between
<I'd fuck a dog because I think it might be a unique one-in-a-lifetime-experienceand
<you WILL fuq ze dawgwhich is a rather important consideration, because people do not like doing what they are coerced into doing. and fuck you I'm hilarious.
In socialism everyone will have the right to reshape their body as they choose with the best of medical science available.
>>769592I don't think it's only a body thing. It's also a mental thing. Many incels are guys who have had sex but go through long dry spells. In fact that's the case for many non-incels.
>>769452Hey man, I don't like the fact that that's how these traits are viewed in my society either, it's just how it is that women don't want to have kids with ugly, short balding or whatever men and don't like their genes.
>>769455Why not? Our money quite literally is our value to them, at least many of us. Women not being materially reliant on men allows them to have sex/relationships with those who they want to and not those who they must for their survival, which is a good thing don't get me wrong but does not bode well for the incel problem.
>>769592This could work, it would ensure that the attraction is there, even if standards may raise. We would need some improvements in looksmaxxing technology though, right now for example leg-lengthening is dangerous, limited in its capabilities and is a long process. I'm not sure if mass heightmaxxing is even going to work in the same way as other looksmaxxing techniques though, it seems like height preferences are largely determined by other women's standards and comparative height between men.
>>769594by the normie definition of incel sure, but those guys are part of the "incel problem" of the OP post as they are literally involuntarily celibate. NTA.
>>769595We should start with cosmetic gene therapy and worldly awareness
>>769595>Why not? Our money quite literally is our value to them, at least many of us. Women not being materially reliant on men allows them to have sex/relationships with those who they want to and not those who they must for their survival, which is a good thing don't get me wrong but does not bode well for the incel problem.The incels problem is because men make women into commodity.
If you think economic autonomy for women isn't the answer to the inceldom crisis then you're part of the problem.
Sex is gatekept. It's not really an issue of money. Even billionaires have to rely on skills other than money to get hoes
>>769592We should have aesthetic awareness in schools.
In order to have ideal bodes in adulthood it requires pre requisite training in childhood
>>769603I'm not really getting your point about the commodification of women being behind the incel problem. You're right that there is more to being sexually/romantically successful than just being rich, such as looks, but that's a product of a time where women ARE more economically autonomous, look 100 or 200 years back where women were not having careers and had to marry men who offered that, nowadays women are more free to exercise their preference based on looks as they quite literally don't need men.
InKKKels will be eradicated.
>>769621So what's the problem here?
Women are industrially/economically autonomous
Semi/fully immersive virtual reality porn
>>769079The most serious answer you'll get is that there were no incels in the Soviet Union. The situation was better for working class men. Money largely never entered consideration and everyone still got married because being married is simply more comfortable for women than not as a rule. What you call settling down is mostly about psychological factors and not money.
>>769595>Our money quite literally is our value to them, at least many of us.That was never the case for the working class. You could read but just imagine a victorian worker, your mental image is probably enough to understand how stupid you are being.
>>769627The problem is that I don't see how that solves inceldom.
>>769630I am imagining one, we'll say in England, he has a family, a job at the factory, wages are low so they are probably struggling, perhaps the kids will do odd-jobs at times and the wife may too have a job if conditions so require. His value to her isn't likely his looks or personality or whatever, he supports the family with his job.
>readI don't do so enough, but Kollontai writes of this, of economic conditions under capitalism coercing women into marriage and sex, and how the removal of these coercive forces via the liberation of the proletariat is the very thing that is supposed to allow women to exercise free love. Is it so unfair to say that the value that these men provide to these women is economic? That a man who's married for economic stability is married for his money? That a man who goes to a brothel and has sex with a prostitute is valued for his money? That a boss who has sex with his female employees is valued for his money, or rather his ability to ensure others are payed out of the company's funds?
>>769633Then maye inceldom is a non issue then.
>>769638It can both be true that women being economically autonomous causes inceldom and inceldom is an issue.
>>769671Then that means inceldom is a non issue.
Or are you flirting with reactionary sentiment?
Community dark room/glory hole cabins in every neighborhood. Mandatory STD testing for entrance. Let people choose what sexual organs they want to pair up with. Problem solved
>>769674Why? I don't see how that is reactionary. What does "issue" mean to you?
>>769700You’re reducing female sexual attention to monetary servitude, that’s what.
And your reducing male value to being ATMs
>>769731I wouldn't say that I'm reducing female sexual attention to monetary servitude. Women do have a genuine sexual attraction to some men and will give sexual attention to them, and perhaps sometimes will do so for other reasons, maybe they love them or whatever, but most guys are given sexual attention for what they provide. I am kind of reducing most men's *sexual* value to being ATMs but I'm just describing reality as I see it, I don't want for it to be this way.
>>769738And this is due to men putting way too much emotional investment in women
>>769741Yeah I mean, if men weren't desperate for women then there wouldn't be an incel problem, but we kind of are and I don't see that changing any time soon.
>>769798This can be solved with normalizing sex dolls. Make them a semi-mandatory luxury for teenage boys.
Why should people waste away their libidinal energy on those that don’t want them?
>>769812I don't know. Plenty of incels have or can easily buy sex dolls, and I feel like the social pressure not to do so isn't what is stopping them from buying them en masse. Incels could also go pay for a hooker, but people want to be loved and desired.
>>769825Just randomly or as part of a larger eugenic campaign to end incels?
>>769829>Just randomly or as part of a larger eugenic campaign to end incels?I don't care how it happens. just encourage aborting males. this will improve the gender ratio for men. of course this will also produce many femcels but it's not like they're going to start any mass shootings
>>769825Why is that image of Pepe aborting a Wok so fucking funny?!?!
>>769847Abortion is funny.
>>769825>>769832So ou endorse androcide.
Inceldom won't stop even if there's only one man per hundred women.
Inceldom isn't due to excess males.
Also femcels have committed crime.
And mass shootings are not incels. Theyre right wing idealists
So why is anti natalism condemned when it's about reducing human suffering but androinfanticide is okay hen it's about "incel control"?
Free hormones
Free cosmetic surgery
>>769855"its not a choice!1" bros when it's about cishet males (it's no longer convenient to apply that logic)
You're joking but libs do be sayin dat doe >>769853>Inceldom won't stop even if there's only one man per hundred womenidealism,you really have no idea how insanely skewed that ratio would be
don't care about the rest
incels choose to be incels, end of story
>>769895oh well at least they wouldnt be feeling any pain
>>769916doesn't apply to self diagnostics and labels duh
>>769916this doesn't refute the basic premise, an incel is not born, but made, but this is not something entirely forced on them, they still choose to be worthless incels, who are as valuable as ash under my feet
>>769577>fuck you I'm hilarious.Say something funny.
>>769921NTA. Do people choose to be ugly, or short, or of an unattractive race, or balding, or autistic? These things are literally all genetic and all determine your dating success. Unless by "incel" you refer to some ideology.
>>769895You’re the one whose idealistic. Gender ratios aren’t that skewed.
Also, inceldom is not born they’re made.
Womens preferences aren’t gonna change based on male quantity
>>770004100 to 1 would be ridiculously huge (of course right now they're like 1.01 to 0.99)
women preference wouldn't matter,they would be alone or settle ,unless we pretend only men desire companionship (kinda sexist tbh)
of course you're probably mad that not 100% of incels would disappear (this is nonsense obviously,you can't totally "fix" it),but the numbers would be drastically lower.
>>769995Lookism is denied as a motive of romantic prospects
>>769849>Abortion is funny.Yeah it is
(BTW I meant to say “Pepe aborting a WOJAK but the fucking thing autocorrected to “Wok”)
>>770024Only the most bluepilled redditor or journalist would deny that women prefer dating attractive men
>>770054Most threads where OP whines about romantic rejection has the usual cliche sterile consolation from anons praising OP as a “strong independent person with a heart of gold”
Bonus points if there are complaints about ageism
>>770054Journalist pieces are just obnoxious.
Doesn’t matter if they’re lib, right wing, secular, religious etc
They all repeat the same moralistic platitudes about “being more than the sum of our parts”
there is no political solution to inceldom, it's nature
gemdom world order where amazons go on raiding parties to capture young fertile men to enslave
>>770124>say no to black pillSorry but I yes to blackpill
Don’t confuse blackpill for redpill
>>770128Normies think we're all the same anyways. But you're right just wanted to post that cause i found it funny.
Unique IPs: 45