No.1267
>>727Ah, yes. Ghislaine. Best girl.
No.1268
>>771I need a specific combination of masc and fem traits for this kind of women to be attractive to me. Like, no overly broad sholdiers/chest/spine or muscles that look rough or a face that looks masculine. The proportions need to be feminine overall. I really don't think bi are into this specifically, they are attracted to masculinity and femininity seperately, not their combinations. Also, not like I refuse to enjoy regular women with big boobs and thighs either. Bremerton is hot, thank you, Azur Lane devs, very cool.
Honestly, sexuality is a spook regardless so I don't really care if you consider me bi or straight. I'm not into men, that's for sure.
No.1269
>>771>I totally understand wanting strength in a woman but they can be relatively strong without having muscles like a well built man on steroids.Or, you know, seeing as they are women and all, they have muscles like well built women on steroids. Anybody can build muscle under such conditions. It is a product of culture that male bodybuilding is encouraged compared to female bodybuilding. That has a relationship to certain biological realities (men tending to do dangerous things more than women to avoid endangering pregnancy etc) but it's just as possible in theory for muscles to be encouraged on women and discouraged on men.
No.1270
>>1269>It is a product of culture that male bodybuilding is encouraged compared to female bodybuildingFun fact: so-called "masculinists" encourage masculinity. But only in men. Wonder why.
No.1272
>>1267a tertiary character with barely any screentime is Best Girl Lol
No.1275
>>1268>they are attracted to masculinity and femininity seperately, not their combinations.Absolutely wrong, bishits are the biggest futafags and (fem/tom)boy enjoyers.
No.1276
>>1275Isn't that pansexuality?
No.1277
>>1274The first girl looks pretty hot.
No.1278
>>1276There's no meaningful difference between the two.
>>257993no u
No.1280
>>1278sorry i meant to call
>>1276 a categorybrain
No.1281
>>1276>>1278Pansexuality is mostly for zoomers who decided (against all reality of the situation) that bisexual erases trans and non-binary people. The actual differences in definition between things like bisexual, pansexual, polysexual, omnisexual, etc are so minute that they are irrelevant unless for some reason you need to describe precisely the mechanics of attraction.
<bisexual: catch-all for people attracted to more than one gender<pansexual: attracted to people without regard for gender<polysexual: attracted to more than one gender but not necessarily all genders (usually used to denote specifically a lack of attraction to one or more groups like cis men)<omnisexual: attracted to all genders, but attractted to the gender specifically or differently rather than in a gender-blind way No.1282
>>1281>bisexual: catch-all for people attracted to more than one genderThe fuck? It's called "
bisexual" for a reason. It isn't called "multisexual."
No.1283
>>1282If you're going to split hairs about etymology like this (which is not how linguistics actually works) then you need to consider that
homosexual means "same sex" while
heterosexual means "other sex," and not "opposite sex." By this kind of logic, "heterosexuals" would be attracted to anybody who is not just like them in terms of sex and gender identity.
No.1284
>>1283>By this kind of logic, "heterosexuals" would be attracted to anybody who is not just like them in terms of sex and gender identityHmmmm. On second thought, you can imagine that perhaps being attracted to futa girls or femboys doesn't make you gay.
No.1285
>>1284You can also imagine that all of these terms are rather arbitrarily made up and assigned to people in a fundamentally
descriptive way (prescribed cultural norms aside), and that sexuality is significantly more complex than an attraction to some essential quality in another person, because it has to first pass through a perceptual filter (which includes ideology). If we truly were attracted to something like "women"
per se then nobody would be attracted to drawings of women or even photographs of women. Ce n'est pas une femme.
Unique IPs: 13