/GWM/ Thread III: Da Return

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name44025
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1645657229522-0.jpg (90.88 KB, 1080x1349, 1538332.jpg)

File: 1645657229522-1.mp4 (1.51 MB, 640x800, 1633263.mp4)

File: 1645657229522-2.mp4 (576.24 KB, 720x1280, 1649320.mp4)

File: 1645657229522-3.jpg (265.2 KB, 1365x2048, AnyConv.com__Es2OQT0U4AQ6r….jpg)

File: 1645657229522-4.png (463.36 KB, 828x1200, b334769f8e1dc6aa6f6bbed35e….png)

/GWM/ Thread III: Da Return Anonymous 23-02-22 23:00:30 No.714[View All]

Muscular women thread - 2D, 3D, 4D all welcome

551 posts and 2000 image replies omitted.

Anonymous 02-06-22 09:07:26 No.1266

>>726
I don't remember Alex having a six-pack HMMMM. Must be from all the mining.

Anonymous 02-06-22 09:19:04 No.1267

>>727
Ah, yes. Ghislaine. Best girl.

Anonymous 02-06-22 13:27:27 No.1268

>>771
I need a specific combination of masc and fem traits for this kind of women to be attractive to me. Like, no overly broad sholdiers/chest/spine or muscles that look rough or a face that looks masculine. The proportions need to be feminine overall. I really don't think bi are into this specifically, they are attracted to masculinity and femininity seperately, not their combinations. Also, not like I refuse to enjoy regular women with big boobs and thighs either. Bremerton is hot, thank you, Azur Lane devs, very cool.

Honestly, sexuality is a spook regardless so I don't really care if you consider me bi or straight. I'm not into men, that's for sure.

Anonymous 02-06-22 13:40:55 No.1269

>>771
>I totally understand wanting strength in a woman but they can be relatively strong without having muscles like a well built man on steroids.
Or, you know, seeing as they are women and all, they have muscles like well built women on steroids. Anybody can build muscle under such conditions. It is a product of culture that male bodybuilding is encouraged compared to female bodybuilding. That has a relationship to certain biological realities (men tending to do dangerous things more than women to avoid endangering pregnancy etc) but it's just as possible in theory for muscles to be encouraged on women and discouraged on men.

Anonymous 02-06-22 13:55:29 No.1270

>>1269
>It is a product of culture that male bodybuilding is encouraged compared to female bodybuilding
Fun fact: so-called "masculinists" encourage masculinity. But only in men. Wonder why.

Anonymous 02-06-22 14:04:51 No.1271

>>1269
>but it's just as possible in theory for muscles to be encouraged on women and discouraged on men
We shall not choose "either/or."

Anonymous 02-06-22 22:52:49 No.1272

>>1267
a tertiary character with barely any screentime is Best Girl Lol

Anonymous 04-06-22 21:06:20 No.1273

File: 1654376780359-0.png (1.6 MB, 476x878, 1654116687254.png)

File: 1654376780359-1.png (1.83 MB, 764x625, 1654116058542.png)

Anonymous 04-06-22 21:49:13 No.1274

File: 1654379352471-0.jpg (114.33 KB, 847x1200, 5b66264cb7998a4c35611188be….jpg)

File: 1654379352471-1.jpg (168.78 KB, 1000x1429, 74c356ae3ea80673bce63d5455….jpg)

File: 1654379352471-2.jpg (165.36 KB, 850x1189, sample_572004039f55d213855….jpg)

>>1273
>women in leather jackets
My only weakness!

Anonymous 04-06-22 21:52:09 No.1275

>>1268
>they are attracted to masculinity and femininity seperately, not their combinations.
Absolutely wrong, bishits are the biggest futafags and (fem/tom)boy enjoyers.

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:13:09 No.1276

>>1275
Isn't that pansexuality?

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:15:40 No.1277

>>1274
The first girl looks pretty hot.

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:16:43 No.1278

>>1276
There's no meaningful difference between the two.
>>257993
no u

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:19:35 No.1279

>>1278
How so?

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:22:06 No.1280

>>1278
sorry i meant to call >>1276 a categorybrain

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:22:27 No.1281

>>1276
>>1278
Pansexuality is mostly for zoomers who decided (against all reality of the situation) that bisexual erases trans and non-binary people. The actual differences in definition between things like bisexual, pansexual, polysexual, omnisexual, etc are so minute that they are irrelevant unless for some reason you need to describe precisely the mechanics of attraction.
<bisexual: catch-all for people attracted to more than one gender
<pansexual: attracted to people without regard for gender
<polysexual: attracted to more than one gender but not necessarily all genders (usually used to denote specifically a lack of attraction to one or more groups like cis men)
<omnisexual: attracted to all genders, but attractted to the gender specifically or differently rather than in a gender-blind way

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:38:23 No.1282

>>1281
>bisexual: catch-all for people attracted to more than one gender
The fuck? It's called "bisexual" for a reason. It isn't called "multisexual."

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:46:16 No.1283

>>1282
If you're going to split hairs about etymology like this (which is not how linguistics actually works) then you need to consider that homosexual means "same sex" while heterosexual means "other sex," and not "opposite sex." By this kind of logic, "heterosexuals" would be attracted to anybody who is not just like them in terms of sex and gender identity.

Anonymous 04-06-22 22:57:50 No.1284

>>1283
>By this kind of logic, "heterosexuals" would be attracted to anybody who is not just like them in terms of sex and gender identity
Hmmmm. On second thought, you can imagine that perhaps being attracted to futa girls or femboys doesn't make you gay.

Anonymous 04-06-22 23:07:00 No.1285

>>1284
You can also imagine that all of these terms are rather arbitrarily made up and assigned to people in a fundamentally descriptive way (prescribed cultural norms aside), and that sexuality is significantly more complex than an attraction to some essential quality in another person, because it has to first pass through a perceptual filter (which includes ideology). If we truly were attracted to something like "women" per se then nobody would be attracted to drawings of women or even photographs of women. Ce n'est pas une femme.

Anonymous 05-06-22 07:04:56 No.1286

File: 1654412695297-0.jpg (40.36 KB, 640x640, 1654385035972.jpg)