So Marxism-Leninism is obviously opposed to abstraction since it's idealism, but what will be the fate of programming languages that have their entire root in abstractionism like Python and R? I know biotechnicians base a lot of their technical knowledge in these languages which is basically called for since a large portion of biology nowadays is dominated by mendelian idealists who think lysenkoism is wrong and bad, so clearly programming languages have suffered from the same kind of idealistic penetration as biology itself. Will communism destroy idealistic programming languages like python and R?
>So Marxism-Leninism is obviously opposed to abstraction since it's idealism
Stopped reading
>>21261neither marxism nor materialism are opposed to abstraction in all cases anon
Why is python's syntax so bad. It's truly alien, divorced from history: neither Wirthian nor Curly-Brace nor Lisp; everything is abbreviated for some reason, and the most important syntactic element is emptiness. How did such a language become popular?
>>26356Cult, same thing as with Rust.
>>26356>and the most important syntactic element is emptinessyou know what they say about jazz: it's about the notes you don't play
>programming is litteraly jazz because i said so, OKAY!
Literally everything would just be math without abstraction. You need abstraction to have physics, cheistry, biology, sociology, economics, etc…
>So Marxism-Leninism is obviously opposed to abstraction since it's idealism
idiot
mods, destroy this silly bitch
>>26365>Literally everything would just be math This would be so much better than
>>26364.
>>26369I think he is pretending to be retarded
we need to abolish spoken languages because it's an abstraction from the uhh base materialism and is idealism or something. real Marxist-Leninists should only communicate using random grunts and growls
Remember in my math classes constantly looking back to the set theoretical definitions and theorems; there is something to be said for having these abstractions which none the less allow you to trivially bias them to get more work done, and more understanding of the topic.
>>26373>>26377>abolish spoken languagesOn this point words like "Marxist-Leninism" conveys almost nothing to the average person (it doesn't even have an entomology), and vast quantities of commonly used categories or names are completely misunderstood or are so poorly defined as to barely exist in the first place.
If there was definitive proof communism would destroy Python, R, FP based languages, and stinky CS PHD's, all my friends that are not juniors would support it.
Well instead they support it based on facts and logics. Funny how every one in C++, including me, is some sort of anarchist/libsoc. Freedom from the bourgeoisie, the state, and the compiler, or death!
>>21261>abstractions are idealistVulgar Marxism be like, smh.
Economic classes are themselves abstractions. Our natural languages are based on abstractions. We literally cannot think without using abstractions. Just stop.
Abstract programming languages are compatible with Marxism. And I would claim they're the only truly proletarian languages since they're easier to learn and understand for the non-programmers. And the more abstract they are, the easier they are to understand which means more contributions to FLOSS projects and more eyes on the code.
Now which is better: Python or Lisp?
Unique IPs: 15