So, I'm a musician, who wants to have a musical career (a lot of communist musicians had stable careers) and meanwhile stupid porkies tell me that "no, we'd prefer if you were replaced, prole, because there if no place for people like you" and I hear, not only music, but other art, computer science, programming etc. will be replaced by AI. How do we stop this, so people are still prosperous in the real socialst societies?
230 posts and 23 image replies omitted.>>27961>you should kill yourselfwhy?
>What do you even believe you total fraudclass
>You have nothing. No sense of life inside of you. No belief in any in anyone elsewhy should i? this is just glittering generality, you have no argument beside vague moralistic whining.
>An utterly craven and empty husk who seeks violence and conflict for blood sportwhere have i demonstrated that i seek violence? what have i demonstrated that i am afraid of? do you have ANY evidence of my supposed cravenness?
you are seeing things that are not there.
>>27560>An AI can't perform live showsHoo boy…
>>27559reactionary garbage, robots reducing need for money exchange is literally a good thing
As an artist (who doesn't use AI) I… don't care.
It's tiresome when people confuse artisinal skill with artistic merit. They aren't the same.
In digital art we've had plugins and shaders for decades. None of these have killed the field, but they have raised the bar. And the recent achievements in AI are no different.
Like imagine thinking great works of art can be reduced to "pretty pictures". Which is what most of the AI stuff out there is. It's like beautiful fractals, but more advanced - they can still be pretty in their own right.
>But what if people think you're using AI!?Who cares? Do we split hairs over whether painters created their own paint? I wouldn't be able to do what I do if not for the work of
millions of people before me.
It doesn't distract from my artistic vision. Rather it is it's foundation.
>It's soullessThe datasets they're derived from weren't created in a vacuum. What AIs generate is a reflection of human artistic output. It's no more "soulless" than the slop which was being churned out before 2020.
>But how would you feel if somewhere were to copy YOUR styleImitation is the highest form of flattery isn't it? Besides, it's not like this didn't happen before.
Like have you noticed how samey Anime looks these days compared to the 80s and 90s? We were already living in an era of slop.
>>27589>If your art is so unorginal, commercial and predictable that it is actually losing ground to AI slop then it isn't art, it is a commodityThis is already the case with commissions, much of it is thinly veiled (or obvious) smut/fetishes
>>27984>It's like beautiful fractals, but more advancedNo wonder why Stable Diffusion fucks up the clothing and anatomy. It's literal mutations.
>It's no more "soulless" than the slop which was being churned out before 2020.Refer to the above.
Look, I am no artist but even I am getting sick of AI art. Not because "Oh, no, poor artists!" but because the technology is simply not there. And honestly, I'd rather not see a lot of the art from real "artists" either, learn how to FUCKING DRAW first before posting, Jesus Christ.
>>28010chatbots will NEVER become skynet
VC clowns will NEVER recoup their investment
people will NEVER care about chatting with a soulless corporate text generator
COPE, SEETHE and LOSE 10 trillion dollars bill gates
>>28035The machines the luddites/"neo-luddites" were against had a purpose and would persist and improve over time. The lathe was
not a scam to get companies ready to bankrupt and rugpull investors. Lathes are still used to this day.
Unique IPs: 23