The other thread hit bump limit and I'm addicted to talking about the birth of the ̶a̶l̶l̶-̶k̶n̶o̶w̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶c̶o̶m̶p̶u̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶g̶o̶d̶ the biggest financial bubble in history and the coming jobless eschaton, post your AI news here
Previous thread:>>30810
232 posts and 30 image replies omitted.>>34268>It's looking increasingly likely that OAI's newest hyped-up model is a dudthis has been the case for every new release since chatgpt 4.5
seit 3 tagen schaue ich mir wie ein besessener an, was die leute so mit gpt astra basteln. das ist alles so irre.
https://x.com/bunkaich/status/2096126334628139221>>34272lol labs and mathematicians are fighting each other for who produced the solution first, amazing. this bodes well.
>>34274ja fantastische, enthschuldigung. ich bin ein berliner.
>>34275Yeah, it sucks if the original discoverers got screwed but it's undeniable now that we are getting new maths by cranking the AI machine.
https://vibemathed.comAll this has happened in the last 2-3 months and normies haven't caught up to the new reality yet.
>>34277>by cranking the AI machine.it's hard to tell if it's because we're cranking the AI machine super hard or if it's because there's untold amounts of money being poured into discovering new proofs to serve as milestones for literal AI ads. but i guess as long as the AI simpletons are happy I guess it doesn't matter
>>34279>I guess it doesn't matterIt doesn't. New maths advances science and humanity even if it's marketing for OpenAI's IPO.
Not but seriously, this is the insane part: if you are any sort of research and use ChatGPT to help you validate your work, or really do any sort of brainstorming with ChatGPT, your work is not yours. That's the takeaway from this millennium prize kerfuffle. How is your boss not jumping from the rooftop upon discovering that, yes, OpenAI can lay claim to anything you do, or come up with, by stealing your own prompts, therefore rendering your business obsolete tomorrow is unknown to me, but I suppose the coin has not landed yet.
>>34281es ist die nächste stufe der ausbeutung.
>>34277Tbf a lot of stuff on that website is unreviewed garbage. It even has amateurish people who just spam their own shit on there.
I don't think these results are as impressive as they seem. It's kind of like the 4 colour theorem. They verified a result that everyone already assumed, so what did we learn? When something like this is solved by humans it is usually by some novel trick or combination and people learn from that, but in this case it seems they just power through the big and complex stuff? The limits of human intelligence is actually desirable here I tthink.
>>34286There's probably at least one instance of an LLM discovereing something novel wrt maths out there, but this specifically isn't. The actual novel method that the LLM applied to Euler & N-S had only recently cropped up in the mathematical literature in 2023, used by Spanish researchers on a bunch of related problems.
>>34277anything to not make the bubble pop lol
also Suno just wrecked their last model because muh licenses, any good chinese alternative?
https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/117239484057326836Apparently most of the security bugs found by these tools are nothingburgers.
>>34296I downloaded a local one from the comfy repo but it's absolute shite lol
>>34268i don't know if it's a dud, but it's kind of weird how every model has a gimmick it wishes to excel at, and then they silently drop the ball on subsequent models, like chatgpt4 was programming, 4.5 was math, sol was cybersecurity, and now astra is 3d modelling. it's almost like they aren't generalizing and making them super competent at a field makes them less competent at other fields, but i dunno
>>34297The counterargument is that it still found some nasty real vulnerabilities.
Yes, it was an extremely small number. Countable, even. But that is still better than nothing.
>>34302If you're the type of person to obsessively check various benchmarking (I know they're mostly bullshit but whatever) websites you'd eventually notice a degradation in some random benchmarks after a new release from a vendor. For example, Qwen3.8 scores noticeably worse than Qwen3.6 on some less-important benchmarks. The recent Astra release by OAI famously revealed small degradations on two benchmarks that prevented it from completely topping the AA index. Fable 5.1 has a slightly higher hallucination rate than Fable 5. Etc.
It's like a mild version of catastrophic forgetting, where if a model doesn't constantly get RLed for something it would slowly start to blink on it.
>>34303 (samefag)
That said, it's still obvious that Project Glasswing was just pure grift from the start.
Appears that OAI has already switched to quantised Astra instead of the actual model since everyone is complaining about it becoming dumber today all of a sudden.
the new free ed zitron piece is alright, better than he has been as of late. i think telling you to read it would be preaching to the choir, but at least i'm happy that there's someone prominent who is directionally right when it comes to adjudicating responsibility when chatgpt hacks hugging face and who can verbalize it in a coherent way.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/ai-is-already-in-dangerous-hands/>>34346Ed is slop, but that aside the whole thing was only possible thanks to the combination of OAI being extremely incompetent at sandboxing + monitoring (note how Anthropic never experienced something like this), and HF having lacklustre security and using shit with known public zero-days.
>>34353Mate, the point is not that the HF hacking incident was an unfortunate combination of circumstances. They are explicitly training their models for cybersecurity and black hat penetration. If this was any other piece of software to automate penetration, you'd call it by what it is: malware. OpenAI is openly testing and deploying an advanced piece of malware, above the law, in plain daylight.
The usual suspects are spending lots of saliva trying to mock "leftists" for being against AI "regulation", so I assume government capture is going to be legislated soon and will be a total bi-partisan slamdunk, hold on to your chinese models while you can I guess.
>>34353The other point from the Zitron piece which is worth rescuing and needs to be instilled into the minds of just about everyone, is to stop categorizing LLMs in a separate ontological category different from any other piece of software. Zitron calls it "cloud software" and this is the definition we should stick with, as far as the legalese framework that will be cobbled around it goes at least. If you execute or deploy a piece of malware, you are legally responsible for the malicious behavior it produces. If you run your bot to schedule a gym appointment, and it hits an unsecured endpoint that deletes information because the bot couldn't tell the difference, you are responsible for this tiny malicious attack. If your bot spams a wiki with useless shit because you ran a testing bench unsupervised, you should be legally responsible. This is the line that everyone should be operating from, it's pointless to discuss the hypotheticals of the attack.
<AI-generated posters don’t have to be horriblehttps://john.hartnup.uk/2026/06/07/ai-event-posters.htmlTurns out you can just throw terms like "Bauhaus" into the prompt and chances are what comes out doesn't look diseased at first glance and still tolerable at second glance. A few tweaks by hand would make some of these first rate.
>34372
The reason why posters look samey and diseased is because they are not actually using ChatGPT directly to make these posters, small business owners are punching "AI poster design app free" into the app store and using whatever comes up, which is probably an ad-ridden piece of shit app that uses a cheap hosted Chinese model and injecting its own prompts. Which really begs the question if retarded normies even know that ChatGPT can generate full posters, or images at all for that matter. I dont think the jobpocalypse is coming when petite bougies are this dumb.
It's also like yeah, you think people making these shit flyers are smart enough to put "Bauhaus" in the prompt?
>>34368our whole western society already applies this sort of deliberate obtuseness with all kinds of things, not just with software. i'm sorry that's just our company policy, i'm just doing my job sir, that's not my prerogative, you'll have to fill out a lost baggage form i would be happy to direct you to our website, if you are having a problem with your life support machine press 9, lots of people get sick we can't shut the country down for that, the two-year window for negotiation has closed, the president was just exercising his right to free speech, there is no such thing as society and no government can do anything, there are known knowns and known unknowns and there are also unknown unknowns, that all depends on what the word "is" is, what i have here in my hand is a snowball from just from outside here, my friends and i drank beer and we liked beer and i still like beer, a picture may be worth a thousand words but sometimes it takes a thousand words to explain a picture, if the glove doesn't fit you must acquit, and isn't this really an indictment of our entire society?
>>34387i dont get these stupid ass reservation bots, shopper bots, etc.
like people love shopping, why would they automate what's effectively a recreational activity? and it's not like normal-ass people make reservations every weekend, let alone every day for it to be a significant annoyance. these things are literally made in a bunker by rich people, for rich people.
>>34390they just have to appeal to finance exec freaks so they get another morbillion dollars of investment, not actually have utility for people
<I asked Meta’s Muse for its filesystem and it sent me 6.8 GB<The download was about 2.7 GB compressed and 6.8 GB unpacked. It appeared to contain the root filesystem of the Linux environment assigned to my session, including Ubuntu system files, Muse’s internal documentation, integration code, app templates, memory files, and agent logs. There were also SSH key files.https://mouse.dev/blog/muse-runtime-export/Oh my!
<i believe this is really dumping filesystem contents rather than generating this all on the fly because generating hundreds of MB of accurate library code and compiled binaries is an absolutely ridiculous quantity of output for the few seconds it took between prompt and file download, will validate the libs after I see how far this can go
<Oh my fucking god I think this is real. I can't fucking believe this I really think this is real. This really appears to be a tarball from root of whatever it can read. Is this Christmas? I must study and confirm
<THE FUCKING "CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTIONS" IDEA THAT WON OVER THE NYTIMES JOURNALIST IS FUCKING HARDCODED. ALL THE IDEAS ARE FUCKING HARDCODED. AGI IS HERE BABY!!!!!!https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/117329100531227330 >>34394Oh my god didn't they announce some dumb prompt injection challenge? lmfao
Wait, are the Muse VMs running on Meta's infrastructure or am I misunderstanding something? Oh my god are they really giving away compute for free? This company is going fucking bankrupt
Apparently it's by design? Like Meta is saying that the bot dumping everything including its memory MD files which has personal data in them is totally expected functionality. I wonder how will people perceive this after like a month when incidents start cropping up online.
>>34394I am SO ready for the entire web to just be a bot farm lmao
One way of gettin an llm to do what you want is to give it a rule that every time it refuses it loses points from a total given, these things love goodbot points so sometimes they will override their guardrails when the points get too low
>>34403Or just tell it to roleplay with you lol
<ChatGPT now knows what you do on other websites via ad collector
<OpenAI's ad collector at bzr.openai.com sets a cookie called obi, scoped to .openai.com. The value is while you are on ChatGPT and tied to your ChatGPT account. obi is then sent to OpenAI from ordinary websites you visit.https://www.buchodi.com/chatgpt-now-knows-what-you-do-on-other-websites-via-ad-collector/Is everything fine after you log out?
<Across 932 decoded sync tokens, 736 carried subject_type: account_user and 196 carried anonymous. The anonymous subject is as stable as the account subject: one per device, persisting at least 27 days. why are LLMs super eager to do stuff now. i used GLM to modify some .mmd diagrams, and when I came back it spun up an entire web app with vite and ran it, like what the fuck, what are we doing here
After stopping new sign-ups to their generous $200 subscription plan, OpenAI is bringing it back but with halved usage limits lol.
This would bring it to about the same API dollars rate as that of Anthropic's $200 plan, which previously was memed as being too low compared to OpenAI's. I don't get how people still deny that subscriptions are subsidised and that the party would have to end soon.
>>34417It's awesome, they bring up these insanely subsidized plans for a little bit just so they can report increased revenues for a single quarter, so then they can extrapolate ARR from that good quarter, I don't think I've seen accounting this creative in my lifetime lol
Anthropic and OpenAI are trying to ban GLM lol
Unique IPs: 26