I have recently heard of a theory regarding how money is technically what we can consider magick. I do not remember it's exacts but I will try to paraphrase it:
>Magick involves the extrapolation of a desire into a particular object
>We can consider talismans as well as enchanted objects to be part of these particulars
>Money is a literal piece of paper that loses value immediately after it's used
>Despite that, it has driven men to madness, and men to hatred
>It has driven wedges in families, it has burned bridges where there could be one
It is a valueless object that has been imbibed values across centuries. It is an object that replaced barter.
Think of it. It's a literal bill that you can produce by yourself. Do you really believe most practitioners at the top want you to know more about magick? Why else do you think we are literally referred to as the esoteric path? You can consider money to be similar in it's structure.
I am not saying that money is evil or that we should undertake drastic measures to purge it, what I am saying is that it is much like magick, for example, the Islamic cult believes that magick is very much real and should be purged.
What are your thoughts?
wait till you find out about calendars and clocks
>>754time magic is real and very stronk
>>675Yes, money is an example of commodity fetishism taken to the extreme. Money is hardly the only example of this though.
I like Pashukanis' take on the legal subject as a commodity owner.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/pashukanis/1924/law/index.htmI also see race and "biological sex" as fetishising kinds of rent.
bedtime stories are demonic magick meant to make you docile and go to bed earlier, beware!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>797try looking up what commodity fetishism actually is
>>797Are Stirner's beliefs the closest to realization and enlightenment in any form of esoteric thought
>>798>try looking up what commodity fetishism actually isexplain the difference or they are correct