/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

Same reason why it doesn't happen in most countries, the central government is functional enough and thus roving bandits can't gain legitimacy as a political force across the country, it happens in africa because the politician are all obvious western puppet that put money in their pockets and kill their own legitimacy because they expect to just flee if anything happens

>Is it because India is just 10 countries wearing a trench coat?
More or less, over the last 35 years there's been a growing standardization of regional identities. Currently I'd say there are roughly seven prominent cultural regions. the Hindi Heartland, the Punjabi–Himalayan region, Western India, Bengal, the Telugu–Kannada Southeast, the Tamil–Malayalam South and the English-speaking Northeast. This is just ignoring internal divisions like caste and religion.
These regions are culturally distinct enough that they can almost be thought of as separate nations. They have different languages, traditions, and historical experiences, beyond periods when they were incorporated into the same large empires. The idea of India as a single civilization is one of the few narratives that has broad support across much of the political spectrum, with both the left and the right generally embracing it.

>>6249
they didnt have a Mao. they reached the limits of national developmentalism, liberal democracy and third world socialism. the problem was the big landowners had too much power and pull in the government. they were the obstacle to do land reforms which were necessary for big industrialisation like mao started. although the indians did try.

>Glownonymous
>meow
>Only source Indian state narrative (image), reflected on Glowpedia
>Obvious incorrecteness reflected by its complete absence of activity in northeast
Sage