Artists are so mad about "AI art" that they're going to go after boorus now.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1664932136509.png (1.24 MB, 1080x2685, 1664847587885467.png)

Anonymous 05-10-22 01:08:56 No.17281[View All]

Artists are so mad about "AI art" that they're going to go after boorus now.

88 posts and 37 image replies omitted.

Anonymous 16-10-23 21:43:57 No.21828

File: 1697492637163.jpg (166.99 KB, 1024x1024, 1696753221385 Janny Bing A….jpg)

Reposting some guys absolute schizo rant about Bing and Dall-E

>Be me
>Stable Diffusion
>Get made because a seething faggot didn't like a twitter artist
>Dumped more money into an image generating AI than any suspiciously wealthy furry could hope to conjure
>The commission prices are falsified between furries communicating their desire for more money
>They use in-groups and sock accounts to falsify the idea that others are willing to pay X price for Y image
>People have been falling for this for years
>SD comes along to BTFO the artists
>Shitposting commences
>Things slow down because everyone stops caring except for poorfags seething in /acrg/

>But Then One Day Suddenly!!!
>Bing makes an image generator AI
>Despite being neutered and censored Microshits stealthy basedness shines through
>Instantly mogs Stable Diffussion on Day 2
>Gets hands way closer to correct
>Knows what a fucking letter looks like
>Can even generate words frequently
>Bing just needs to realize they can SELL an uncensored version
>I'd buy it, so long as it was under $300 a year

It's just not even funny. I'm floored with disbelief. Imagine getting destroyed as hard as Stable Diffusion has. Fuck, Bing could just make you watch ads while you wait for your gen and make tons of money, only not censoring it if you log into a verified account or some shit.
Stable Diffusion thought it was over for twitter fetish artists.
Bing made it so it was over for Stable Diffusion.

The rebuttal being succinct:
Bing's giving you a taste of what SD will be able to do in 1-2 years. Check out the progress already made on it's next iteration. Stable diffusion is nowhere near 'destroyed' because there's versions of it that fit a completely different purpose, and on top of that Bing is trying their hardest to ruin this with the help of the most cockblocking company around, Openai. There will never be a premium NSFW version of it. It will never be a replacement for open source models because silicon valley corporations and banks fucking hate porn for some reason.

Anonymous 27-11-23 17:18:45 No.22407

File: 1701105525466.png (304.44 KB, 593x903, Disney logo bullshit.png)

The "pixar and Disney" AI is getting rework to essentially unlearn the Disney Logo because Disney is shitting itself over copy-right nonsense… from an AI platform that takes 2 minutes to determine as a fake poster… Disney execs really are looking to blame anyone but themselves for the companies failures.

Anonymous 27-11-23 17:48:40 No.22408

>>21632
> Prosecutors argued during the case that the definition of sexually exploitative material should include descriptions of sexual behaviors by “virtual humans” and not just the appearance of actual children.
Nah man this is retarded as fuck.

Anonymous 03-12-23 08:43:34 No.22467

>>17283
Agreed, but is it supposed to be a bad thing? Wouldn't you agree that it will make Novelai bankrupt in exploiting arts and such? Since they're just profiting at the expense of artists works? Hence, make the open-source AI image generator?

Anonymous 03-12-23 08:48:26 No.22468

>>22407
>Disney vs Microsoft copyright battle
Tempted to say "let them fight" but realistically the ultimate outcome will be even stupider copyright laws.

Anonymous 03-12-23 08:53:22 No.22469

File: 1701593602766.png (22.46 KB, 133x79, ClipboardImage.png)

>>21828
Stable Diffusion is like a programmable AI art workstation. I think most of the quality is dependent on the model and loras you use. I've gotten good results with it. I notice it does way better the higher res the image is as well. The less pixels the more likely it is to fuck things up. I don't have enough VRAM to do 1024 by 1024.

Bing's is pretty amazing but interesting it still fucks up simple shapes like circles for the irises.

Anonymous 03-12-23 16:47:46 No.22480

>>22469
To be fair natural irises aren't necessarily perfect circles or perfectly centered either.

Anonymous 05-12-23 10:33:37 No.22515

File: 1701772417014.png (109.1 KB, 1630x1137, ClipboardImage.png)

>>22480
Yeah but that's way off.

Anonymous 05-12-23 16:00:23 No.22517

>>22515
It's also way cartoony lol

Anonymous 05-12-23 16:05:47 No.22518

>>22517
Talking about the distortion. Just like the brick work is all distorted, not stylized.

Anonymous 05-12-23 19:43:43 No.22522

Certainly this is a pretty complex topic and while I still think these artists are just petty bourgeoisie defending their profits instead of actually fighting capitalism I still can understand them. What makes this situation more complicated is that it has a more positive side: it bankrupts businessmen who are parasitizing on artists as well and gives more power to the poor… if the AI tools are FLOSS, that is. Otherwise, FUCK YOU, MUSK, I'M NOT JOINING YOUR CORPORATE DYSTOPIA!

Anonymous 05-12-23 19:56:51 No.22523

Artists are right to be mad about AI art, stop being a classcuck just to own le humanities libruls

Anonymous 05-12-23 20:02:19 No.22524

>>22523
Can you repeat that without the buzzwords?

Anonymous 05-12-23 20:15:20 No.22525

File: 1701807320610.jpg (61.6 KB, 640x800, 402032656_387084833647338_….jpg)

>>22524
Here: You're trying too hard to be edgy and it's making you sound like a dumbass rightoid. Also picrel

Anonymous 05-12-23 20:17:19 No.22526

>>22525
You don't know what "edgy" even means, or any other buzzword you used, again.

Anonymous 05-12-23 20:17:31 No.22527

>>17296
Based take actually, I like stylized drawings more anyway… Welp, time to whip out my wallet again… *sad poor man's noises*

Anonymous 05-12-23 20:24:52 No.22528

File: 1701807891568-0.png (1.69 MB, 1024x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1701807891568-1.png (1.57 MB, 1024x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1701807891568-2.png (1.69 MB, 1024x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1701807891568-3.png (1.75 MB, 1024x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

>>17296
AI can make anime slop as well.

Anonymous 05-12-23 21:04:56 No.22529

>>22528
That's precisely it tho, it's slopped together. There's nothing to gleam from zooming in or trying to think about why finer details are the way they are. It's just the subject matter, rendered. If AI can make slop, then that leaves artists to make more intentful stuff, because why would one waste their time making slop manually from here on?

Anonymous 05-12-23 21:33:18 No.22530

>>22528
Shirts can be so hot

Anonymous 06-12-23 10:36:33 No.22535

>>17287
>stealing from other proles is BASED actually because the bourgeoisie is stealing from us all anyways! who cares if it immiserates other workers!
you have no conception of class warfare

Anonymous 06-12-23 11:01:34 No.22537

>>17281
This won't end until AI is heavily regulated.
Mandate that all AI-generated content is clearly labeled.
For videos and static images, big red text on top of the image stating "THIS CONTAINS AI GENERATED CONTENT."
Text would have a disclaimer at start, that the AI must automatically generate itself.
Movies, games, books, etc must have a disclaimer at the start and end of their works.
Also the owner of the AI may only train on a work if it has the owner's explicit approval as part of a legal contract.
Any website which hosts AI-generated content that does not follow these regulations would be heavily fined, and in repeat cases shut down.

Anonymous 07-12-23 05:47:53 No.22547

>>22528
WTF, kawaii Alunya?

Reminds me of Ruby.

Anonymous 07-12-23 06:02:24 No.22551

>>22537
We simply need to make it a law that all AI tools must be libre software and everything based on it must be a libre cultural work too. Fuck, just make everything a libre cultural work. OPEN-SOURCE ALL AAA GAMES, ABOLISH COPYRIGHT.

Anonymous 07-12-23 06:19:43 No.22552

>>22551
I feel like copyright will be significantly harder to enforce post-search engines. AI killing search engines and creating effective spidertraps for any new web crawlers means it'll be much harder for IP holders to figure out when their shit is being infringed. The panopticon has killed the panopticon.

Anonymous 07-12-23 19:18:49 No.22557

art is all about human creative expression. that's it. no mention of how cool it looks, no mention of how much you have to move your hand while doing it, no mention of any process whatsoever. creative expression. that's it.

Anonymous 10-12-23 18:07:50 No.22572

>One of the biggest red flags is the fence she's standing next to. The inconsistency of her costume design is also another big standout.
https://nitter.net/GenelJumalon/status/1732474955449663632#m
don't know and don't care if this guy uses AI but it feels insane to see the "proof" of AI being a) rendering like you've traditionally trained in painting and b) not achieving flawless realism on every image

Anonymous 10-12-23 18:15:11 No.22573

>stop doing things I don't like

Anonymous 10-12-23 19:37:32 No.22574

>>22573
Yes.

Anonymous 14-12-23 05:43:06 No.22591

I see the same people that were pushing crypto and NFTs are the ones that say AI art is superior to human art and will replace all human artists and that is a good thing.

Anonymous 14-12-23 06:13:05 No.22592

>>22591
AI art is not and will not be superior to human art, it is merely an imitation of human aesthetics directed by a human, simply using computer programming to generate these aesthetics, rather than illustrating themselves.

It can certainly be a useful tool, and will in time be able to mass produce images for whatever purpose the people behind the program wish to make. This is very obviously easily abused and will likely play into cyber-warfare.

Anonymous 17-12-23 05:18:17 No.22615

It's funny when people complain about AI regarding video games. What are the machines replacing? The medium was stillborn before we passed the 'train leaves station' era.

Anonymous 18-12-23 14:29:56 No.22626

>>22591
>people shill for crypto
<they only shill for Bitcoin or literal joke coins and don't even use them as currency
>people shill for AI art
<AI art that is highly derivative and generic-looking
The future is now, everyone

Anonymous 18-12-23 14:33:13 No.22628

>>22626
><AI art that is highly derivative and generic-looking
your prompts and models just suck

Anonymous 21-12-23 13:34:49 No.22640

>>22628
AI will replace STEMfags like you

Anonymous 21-12-23 14:48:20 No.22642

>>22640
>under capitalism automation makes the bourgeois need to hire less people
thanks for the revelation you spiteful little channer. and?

Anonymous 22-12-23 02:26:11 No.22644

File: 1703211971409.png (341.64 KB, 666x500, ClipboardImage.png)

>>22642
>channer
I'd agree with your statement of the bourg plan, but lose the reddit-speak, it's cringeworthy. NTA BTW.

Anonymous 22-12-23 06:17:12 No.22645

ai art pulls from CP GET FUUUCKEDD

Anonymous 23-12-23 14:29:40 No.22657

>>22645
TSHIRTS WERE MADE BY SLAVES ONCE GET FUCKEDDDDD
BAN ALL TSHITS

Kill yourself, pedophile. And stay on twitter

Anonymous 28-12-23 21:27:10 No.22681

This should be taken advantage of by mass uploading images of famous classical artists and mistag it with every tag they have so it will corrupt AI data making them no longer work till they figure it out and try to clean up their data pool.

Anonymous 30-12-23 08:59:20 No.22720

>>22681
Why bother AI slowly kill itself because as time goes on more and more AI made pics end up in the database used to train the AI themselves resulting in negative feedback loops rendering them useless.

Anonymous 31-12-23 02:57:49 No.22724

>>22720
Wouldnt result of it be exact opposite? Like right now its mostly just smashing together pieces of whatever it has in its database, so cant training on its own creations make it more "creative"?

Anonymous 31-12-23 05:13:52 No.22725

>>22681
>let’s destroy all boorus because AI is getting trained on it

Anonymous 31-12-23 07:08:05 No.22726

>>22681
this is the kind of retarded idea i could only expect from a twitter artist

Anonymous 02-01-24 08:44:51 No.22735

>>22724
not if the ai trained images are shit, or have the problems ai have. In one hand this could create more "creative" ai art. In the othter hand ai might just circle jerk art that has all the problems associted with ai art, which causes the problems to get worse over time. (though this is just a possibility.)

Anonymous 02-01-24 20:52:18 No.22737

File: 1704228737891.jpg (74.4 KB, 820x900, GCYQk8AXMAAz0F_.jpg)

Wow, so like barely anything? Bullish

Anonymous 03-01-24 10:33:07 No.22741

>>22737
Couldn't they use that as a graphics card powered steam engine? Use the computers to boil water which in turn powers the computers. Just supply water and graphics cards.

Anonymous 03-01-24 10:47:36 No.22742

>>22741
I doubt they are hot enough to boil the water.

Anonymous 03-01-24 17:05:59 No.22745

File: 1704301558954.jpg (45.04 KB, 474x266, th-85018744.jpg)

>>22737
If it's too much water, continue the experiment of putting the computers underwater

Anonymous 23-04-24 08:02:00 No.24269

>>17281
>Artists
The funny part about this is that this is similar to what some Mangaka and animation studios do to fanartists, it's part of the reason Mogudan stopped doing Rei.

Anonymous 23-04-24 08:04:35 No.24272

>>22737
I thought they use supercritical fluids as coolant for the servers.

Unique IPs: 25