Anime is pretty much the only place today where you can make high-budget, high-production art where sex is a major focus, without becoming outright pornography. There's a lot you could do with that. There should be more erotic thrillers, or gritty dramas about the psychology of sex, or trippy surreal erotica, and really just anything more interesting than mid action with jiggly boobs or comedies that mostly come down to "oh noes I accidentally groped her boob!" I'm not saying there isn't anything that stands out, every few years something does, the Fujiko Mine anime is a recent example of something that felt pretty fresh, but for all the money and attention that gets poured into this genre, it feels like the ambition is almost null.
It's a boring genre for teenagers
>>29999yeah but WHY? it should be transgressive and dangerous just like erotic movies were in the 60s-70s.
>>29999Much like your posts
>>30162>transgressive and dangerousThere has been 0 media that had those characteristics since the start of humanity
>>30164That's a bold statement considering how unlikely it is that your knowledge of art (or "media" as you Twitter-brained zoomlings erroneously call it) extends past cartoons and popular music.
Read up on pinku films
>>29998Who would watch it? Successful people with interesting lives who would find the commentary on psychology of sex relatable?
>>30165>or "media" as you Twitter-brained zoomlings erroneously call itAre we seriously doing more genpol now?
>>29999Boring is good
>>30162Anytime someone suggest making things spicy and edgy, it always ends up in the same people complaining about it being shitty do to “pandering”
>>30165Most media isn’t “transgressive” or “dangerous”. And besides, that’s a relative term
>>30345From "there has been 0 media that's transgressive and dangerous" to "most media isn't" within a single reply, people here aren't even fucking trying anymore.
>And besides, that’s a relative termObviously, which makes the original point even dumber.
>>30344>Anytime someone suggest making things spicy and edgy, it always ends up in the same people complaining about it being shitty do to “pandering”No it doesn't. Provide strong proof that the exact same groups calling for edgy media are the ones who invariably complain about it later. If your reply is just something like "people disliked <X>" without specifying who and how you know it's the same group of people that was calling for it, I will rape you and kill you.
>>30406What did anon say that was wrong? Most media isnt as mindblowing. Its only a onrity that truly is.
>>30407What else do you want me to say? People complain about horror movies being pathetic because they rely too much on jumpscars or exposure of the horro entity in question, etc.
> I will rape you and kill youTypical
>>30165"Media" and "Works" were general terms for this phenomenon long before "Content" or "Drops" or whatever it is you're thinking is the correct term.
>>30408>What did anon say that was wrong? Most media isnt as mindblowingAre you actually incapable of understanding the difference between "all" (the claim of the original post) and "most" (your much weaker motte-and-bailey claim)? Do you suffer from some sort of mental defect? How is this difficult to understand?
>What else do you want me to say?I want you to say things which you can substantiate instead of wasting my time by replying to my posts with half-baked vibes-based thoughts that you can't even defend.
>>30415>before "Content" or "Drops" or whatever it is you're thinking is the correct term.What I (rightly) think is the correct term is "art", as I explicitly said in the original post. Is everyone on this board retarded?
>>30416Art is a work that conveys information, that work is media when conveyed to others. That isn't le heckin' zoomer-speak, that's just semantics. If zoomers are uniquely often getting this correct then good for them, but they aren't the first.