would you use it, or is /dead/ a sufficient space
>pic unrelated
>>1323You can change the CSS in the top bar, click "Default" and choose "Colgate".
What do you need mod powers for? Do you want to ban me?
>>1316this place is good enough, unless you're planning to be able to shill 0chan places and bring in cool people or something in a way that couldnt happen with /dead/?
otherwise it would just split people's attention and the usebase potentially, and like aside from leftoid bullshit about wanting to amass the most people, having more shit to interact with is the lifeblood of communication platforms like this
>>1342No.
>>1345Post 'smug anime girl 40'.
>>1348That's not what I said.
I think that believing there is any way to securely use the internet without making your data available to the government is naive. If you want to tell yourself that there is some arbitrary point at which you are fucked instead of realising that by using the internet you are fucked to begin so you have some fake notion of security to comfort yourself by, be my guest. But don't expect me to buy into that shit.
>>1323>but half the reason I'm even suggesting it is because I hate this board's CSS and doubt space_ would give me back a mod accountyou should get on the matrix and ask at least
Space_ seems like a nice enough guy. This board is just sitting here
>>1384>>1383half-forgotten is kinda harsh. we made like 1000 posts in a year. thats ok.
im happy we are hidden. means less idiots comming over to shitpost.
>>1383thats a good point, i do worry a little that this place could get shut down or even just have problems and not get dealt with, it'd be for the best to have a backup that we can all agree on just in case
if there was 0chan that'd be sick, we wouldnt even need to migrate, it could be a backup. If there was a migration though i'd try to help the place stay alive, this place makes me happy.
>>1385Half-forgotten in the sense that it is (rather appropriately) subject to very little mod/admin oversight. The traffic on this board is at comfy levels.
>>1386If I were to just make it as a backup, it'd be hard to justify spending money to host it but based on the responses in this thread if I do anything it'll be experimenting with some P2P stuff that has matured a lot since I last considered the options for making a successor to 0chan in 2018.
>>1391how much would it actually cost? i cant imagine more than like 100 dollars a year
p2p is sick shit tho, what are you thinking for that?
>>1719i meant to say our own site, because this board is hidden
>>1717kinda true kinda not
>>1728>i meant to say our own siteI get that, but the whole point of why being a hidden board on here is bad is that ppl who otherwise use the site don't see us.
but that's even more true if we are alone on a site.
>>1778Because it's literally a bunch of kids in the mod team living out their power fantasies, they just start acting like they own the place and curate the discussion and generated content on the site, while pretending to be a public 'volunteer'. >>>/leftypol/1221998
Now which democratic people's state does this remind me of? Hm…
>>1789meh, whatever works probably. There's nothing wrong with just some chill common sense moderation. I guess it's easier though when the community is smaller.
I'm personally not a huge fan of trying to apply an anarchist mindset to websites, because ultimately it's turf that you're using for discussion for a reason, and so it cant just be like voluntary association whatever. That's what p2p nets are for i guess. Depending on the format, there's still some need for quality control and stopping dumb sliding shit or getting rid of spammers, or it can stop being a postie site and a postie space.
>>1791 (me)
btw join the unofficial /dead/ riot community if you want a temporary home in case this place disappears one day
/join #LMT:matrix.skeletoncrew.xyz
>>1794what do you not need to register on to join? IRC is dead, what else is there? legit
anyways just make a cock.li over tor, its not like you need to give any info to register
and i didnt give any info to anyone anyways, i just set up my own homeserver
>>1774/leftypol/'s culture hasn't exactly been welcoming to post-left types since like, ever. I'm not sure if space_ cares enough to delete this board though.
>>1778there's a far lower opportunity cost for a single stray idiot to bump a thread and attract other idiots into replying, even if the core userbase is mostly behaving properly. like it or not, good moderation is the only thing that can keep an imageboard, especially a political one that isn't reactionary given the state of imageboard culture, from degenerating into fash trolls shitting up the board constantly and astroturfing the culture. this is pretty much just unavoidable given the overall architecture of HTTP, but every p2p option has its drawbacks as well. at least at the moment.
>>1796it's understandable considering how much of an insufferable tripfag I was back then.
also
>he >>1820wait everyone thought you stopped posting here?
also the mods literally delete and astroturf shit to their own liking anyways, so it's not like it matters, /leftypol/ is pretty much /pol/ but leftist, i could list on similarities but oh well
>>1824what did they mean by this
>>1829I did. I just lurk on this board and a few others on different sites every so often.
I'm not saying that moderation is an ideal solution, or even a good one, but designing around the social problems that afflict imageboards to mitigate or eliminate altogether the need for mods would require designing something that isn't a traditional imageboard.
>>18331. Why is that thread bumplocked?
2. Is there really even a single person on this site that does not have some kind of adblocker installed?
>>18351. it got bumplocked because space_ is probably not happy about the mods rebelling, and also because the thread is pretty much a giant pile of shit
2. most people on this site probably use adblockers but the principle of serving ads on bunkerchan is what most people are probably not happy about. I think the thread also mentions possibly implementing captchas.
>>3923dead link
what was the site about?
420CHAN IS BACK GUYZ
https://420chan.org/
>"Fredrick Brennan bought 420chan.org on April, 20, 2023, from Kirtaner for the sum of US$4,200.">"Under new management, Kirtaner will remain the admin of 420chan, with Brennan as owner. The goal is for the site to be owned by a non-profit organization, with Fredrick Brennan as Chairman of the Board, by 2025. There are plans to rebuild the site from scratch.">"Additionally, a legal challenge will be brought to recover the servers that were seized by law enforcement in 2022."What do you all think?
>>4207I'm guessing because they're "rebuilding the site from scratch"
>>4209Not really
>>4206Fredrick Brennan was the original founder of 8chan (he says he's sorry about it).
What does this mean for 420chan?
Unique IPs: 12