Fuck the workers, they ruined the movement. The workers are the real class collaborators and traitors. Long Live the international bourgeoisie making things worse so that the workers may realize how much they are being fucked slowly but surely. WHO ALLOWS CAPITALISM? WHO HAS NOT YET REVOLTED? WHO HAS NOT YET DONE A REVOLUTION? THE FILTHY WORKERS. So they are the client. Capitalism benefits the workers masochism and not the bourgeoisie. If the workers weren't retarded masochists they would have done away with it already.
YES I DID IT. I SOLVED CAPITALISM. BE BOURGEOISIE NOT A WORKER. THE BOURGEOISIE HOLD THE INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE AND CONTROL THE MODE OF PRODUCTION, SI SI SI IL DUCE, SI SI SI SI, ᴉuᴉlossnW was right you didn't understand his genius ya'll.
SO, citizens of left of /pol/ I have created a new current to end capital - negative proletarianism. Deng had it right but stopped because he cares about the workers, but the workers are evil, they don't start the revolution - they benefit from capital exploiting them because they are masochist and ignorant. The bourgeoisie may be ignorant but they have the means to end capital. Citizens of left of /pol/ accumulate CAPITAL and join the world market economy so we can bond together and bring about the end of class society FROM ABOVE.
JOIN THE ELITE, join SOROS, join the WEF. DO IT. This is what ze new world order meant. THEY ARE THE GOOD GUYS. This is like negative utilitarianism or some shit where this one crazy guy said that life is bad because of suffering so like killing life reduces suffering I forgot what the premise was but thats basically on the correct track minus the economic analysis - you see the real analysis is that things are the opposite of what they seem SO the bourgeoisie are the guys who can make change but are exploited by the workers to stagnate because the workers are the masses and reactionary and they will get really dumb and angry if the bourgeoisie actually have the interest to end capitalism. One poster said that the biggest lie is that capitalism benefits the bourgeoisie - when capitalism is obviously self destructive. So petite-bourgeoisie and bourgeoisie must unite to end capitalism and fend off against the reactionary workers who are not yet ready for communism. Il Duce you devious schemer I knew you had it in you, you great man, they hated you because they loved you.
Here is a summary - The author argues that workers, not the bourgeoisie, are the true obstacle to revolution, accusing them of being passive, masochistic, and complicit in sustaining capitalism. They propose “negative proletarianism,” claiming the bourgeoisie, with their resources and power, are better positioned to end capitalism “from above.” The text flips the usual class struggle narrative, portraying workers as reactionary and the elite (bourgeoisie, global institutions) as potential agents of change.
>>6179If you are a worker, the question naturally arises, what have you done?
If you're a capitalist, then kindly go hang.
>>6206LESS THAN 1% OF THE WORKERS ARE CLASS CONSCIOUS SURELY, THE WORKING MASSES ARE COMPLETELY DISINTERESTED IN REVOLUTION BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS THEIR SELF-DESTRUCTIVE DEATH WORSHIPPING UTOPIA, IT IS THE CONCLUSION OF MEMENTO MORI, CARRIED OVER BY A LONG FORGOTTEN CLASS, A CLASS BEFORE BOURGOEISIE AND WORKER, A CLASS BEFORE FEUD AND SERF, A CLASS BEFORE MASTER AND SLAVE, A CLASS NOW KNOWN AS A "POLITICIAN" OR "PRIEST" WRONGFULLY PLACED BENEATH THE BOURGEOISIE ON THE TOP WHEN IN FACT THEY ARE THE LOWEST OF THE LOW. THE "WE FOOL YOU" OF THE PYRAMID, THIS CLASS STARTED STAGNATION AND THE DEEPEST REACTION OF HUMANITY - AGAINST ITS OWN GROWTH AND WELLBEING, FOR THE SELF-INTEREST OF THE FEW, THE INTEREST OF THE INFLUENTIAL LIARS. THE "PROPHET" CLASS. THE FIRST GREED TO HAVE EXISTED SINCE SAPIENCE - OUTSIDE OF THE PRIMAL INSTICT FOR BETRAYAL TO SURVIVE - THE FIRST SURPLUS USRPERS WHO ATE TOO MUCH AND GOT TOO FAT.
>>6218>such as mind expansion And mind alteration.
REMEMBER, THE PROOF IS IN THE FACT THAT THE REVOLUTION HASN'T HAPPENED YET. THE "REVOLUTIONARY SUBJECT" OF THE PROLETARIAT HAS REJECTED REVOLUTION AND IS STAGNANT. THE PROOF IS THAT THE REVOLUTION ISN'T HAPPENING, THE PROOF IS THAT THE PROLETARIAT LACK CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS, HARBOR REACTIONARY ATTITUDES, PERPETUATE ANTI-COMMUNIST SENTIMENT AND ARE COMPLETELY DISINTERESTED IN REVOLUTION. THE PROOF IS ALL IN THIS THREAD. READ AND THINK, WE FINALLY FIGURED IT OUT.
>>6179YOU are the proletariat bitch, if you hate the proletariat so much then you should kill yourself
HMM WHICH IS MORE LIKELY….?
>rich people use their money and power to keep their position in society through propaganda etc.
<um ackshually the capitalists are the real communists and true communists should really just do capitalism but edgy and explicitly misanthropic.this site is literally nothing but retards, including me for bothering to engage with such obvious bait
You only see the half truth that the proletariat is reactionary, but mistaking that the petit bourgeoisie and capitalists have revolutionary potential, that's down right wrong, because of their class positions, they cannot remove all of their limitations in their worldviews, unless they become protelariat themselves or are among elite of elites.
The proletariat is reactionary, right, that's why the USSR collapsed and reverted back to some capitalism. However, due to your class origin, you are blinded to the fact that the proletariat is also progressive. THERE ARE ACTUALLY TWO TYPE OF PROLETARIATS. THE NEW AND THE OLD
The old proletariat class, having been content with living without property for so long, becomes happy with it and doesn't complain. They're truly want a happy life, in balance with nature. They're truly the progressive class of the future. Minimalist lifestyle of our modern 21th century, the lying flat people, and most Soviet citizens of 20th century are clearly example. YOUR CLAIM of them being suicidal is plainly wrong, because all of these people just want to live a simple, honest life.
But the NEW proletariat class is the true problem. Yes, people like you! They're truly suicidal, because many of them are petit-bourgeoisie that falling into ranks of proletariat, they displayed the suicidal tendency of wanting BEING IN CONTROL, AND ORDERED SOCIETY. But for true progressive, that's only the mean, not the true purpose. What is the main difference between Stalin and Hitler, Socialism and Nazism? It's exactly that, Stalin must force a rigid ordered society because ultimately his goal is to let people live a happy life, when people lives are better, then all that rigid order can be removed (he's really struggling to that before his dead, for example, removing the Politburo as a group standing higher than Central Committee, a relic from hard times of early revolution). While for Hitler, he only gave Germans better lives just for stablizing the order, making a strong country. And why I'm calling it suicidal, because that was the end of both Hitler and ᴉuᴉlossnW, trying too hard to force an order, lmao.
Another kind of NEW proles are from the capitalist ranks, the CEOs, the managers, and nomenklatura, they all can be called the labour aristocracy, the elite proletariat. Yes, it's true that they are experts of managing the new economy of mankind, but because the spectre of the past, they all have the tendency to think in capitalist logics and have a habit of worshiping profit indicator (aka. growth, the line must go up). It's exactly this kind of proles that lacks class consciousness, and being the main adovacator of Perestroika and CCP reformism.
So yes, proletariat is reactionary, but it is EXACTLY YOUR KIND, THE NEW PROLETARIAT that lacks class consciousness, is reactionary, and need to educate themselves. Now please educate yourself more. No need to at me, I won't answer more. Think deeply, in the future, you will understand I'm right when you become OLD PROLE yourself (that's content without ambition, living in harmony with heaven and earth)
Unique IPs: 11