Read this right now.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1790205436254-1.epub (327.69 KB, Elementary Principles of ….epub)

Read this right now. Anonymous 23-09-26 23:17:16 No.26317

Read this book right now
A major problem I've been noticing through the years is that nobody fucking understands what dialectical materialism actually is. This book is entirely about explaining dialectical materialism.
Of course, it speaks of the philosophies that come before it but only to explain dialectical materialism itself (this is by itself a dialectical process, btw)

Read this shit and spread it!

Anonymous 23-09-26 23:30:50 No.26318

I read the politzer book before. it's good. There was an HTML version that doesn't require and EPUB reader here

http://www.readmarxeveryday.org/epop/pt6.html

Anonymous 24-09-26 03:14:19 No.26319

>>26318
thats a nice website, thanks

Anonymous 24-09-26 15:55:16 No.26320

File: 1790265316348-3.png (17.59 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)

reminding youse again to read this book
MARXISM NEEDS PHILOSOPHICAL FORMATION

Anonymous 25-09-26 15:41:12 No.26321

File: 1790350872066-0.png (11 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)

read tha thang

Anonymous 25-09-26 18:37:17 No.26322

But bro I'm a worker, therefore I already know everything about classes and shit. No theory needed

Anonymous 26-09-26 19:32:05 No.26323

>>26317
Thanks. I downloaded it. I have read a bit about DM, but it seems like a very deterministic way of understanding history.

Anonymous 26-09-26 22:01:27 No.26324

>>26323
>but it seems like a very deterministic way of understanding history.
This is exactly what I used to think, but the book addresses it at various points. It's pretty complete.

Anonymous 27-09-26 15:34:31 No.26325

>>26318
down or dead, lol

Anonymous 27-09-26 15:36:35 No.26326

What’s the point in understanding any of this when you can’t apply it?

Anonymous 27-09-26 16:03:18 No.26327

>>26326
So you can tell when someone is speaking out of his ass.

Anonymous 27-09-26 16:04:04 No.26328

>>26327
Or you can just assume everyone is always speaking out of their ass by default

Anonymous 27-09-26 16:09:24 No.26329

>>26328
Then there is no point in speaking about anything so we should just chat with AI agents for a fix of pseudosocial relationship with a topping of hollow flattery.

Read it NOW 07-10-26 14:27:35 No.26330

Forgot I had already made this thread.
Read da book NOW

Anonymous 07-10-26 14:37:17 No.26331

>>26328
>Or you can just assume everyone is always speaking out of their ass by default
is it really smart to live that way

"hey buddy you're about to get hit by a car, MOVE NOW"

"heh, this guy is probably talking out of his -" SPLAT

Anonymous 07-10-26 15:01:34 No.26332

File: 1791385293662-5.pdf (525.35 KB, 191x255, Karl R Popper - What is Di….pdf)

>>26317
OP what is your opinion on Poppers critique of dialectical method?

Anonymous 07-10-26 16:31:46 No.26333

>>26332
The contradiction is not formal logical… or how to say it. For example
commodity a = commodity b
It looks ok formal logically, right? Then you ask, what is commodity? It can be

use value
exchange value

The contradiction is that: use value a = exchange value b.

Anonymous 07-10-26 16:45:33 No.26334

File: 1791391533005-9-0.png (180.51 KB, 984x675, Dialectical Pain - An Intr….png)

File: 1791391533005-3-1.jpg (61.13 KB, 569x799, hegel-dialectics-philosoph….jpg)

>>26317
Does it explain it tho.

Anonymous 07-10-26 17:14:44 No.26335

>>26325
https://archive.ph/qZkiP
got archived

Anonymous 07-10-26 17:15:28 No.26336

File: 1791393326720-6-0.png (937.45 KB, 1176x1702, accidentally dialectical.png)

File: 1791393326720-3-1.png (867.86 KB, 1806x2015, marx cockshott hegel effor….png)

>>26334
which way western man

Anonymous 07-10-26 17:46:39 No.26337

File: 1791395199401-3.jpg (579.05 KB, 1080x2340, Screenshot_20261007_194545….jpg)

>>26336
thank dog there are tldr machines.

Anonymous 07-10-26 20:13:12 No.26338

>>26332
He say that dialectics is dangerous.. you can return that to him. Like if a contradictions get ignored, you can show ecology, etc, you know.

Also google Right to distress Hegel. But idk if google will show you that, but for me it shows Kant. For Kant moral is empty or pure? So he consider this action still morally wrong. While you can see content in Hegels reply.

Unique IPs: 13