>>43141>>43142In the manifesto or whatever they also say they may fear this practice expands to other industries.
And enjoying a videogame now and then is not "consooming"
>>43144Oh no, it could spread to other products I
CONSOOOOM? Will my funko pops, Marvel movies, anime merch, and pokemon cards be effected too?
>>43151>aftermarket developing and right to repair is bad because it was in the marketor worse, because it's video games.
so more twitter radlib user logic.
>>43153most soyteen are half-chan users or groomers pretending to be teens
>>43154>consolesi know this is bait
but, did you even look at anything at all yet?
>>43157at best it's off topic
pc windows vista master race ether way tho
>sleepwhere do you think we are.
>>43158so you even more rot in the head from twitter then.
>>43159>twitterIdk what that is.
Is it like a video game?
Can I
consoom it?
Will it support my
consoomer revolt?
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) >>43161>4chan or bulskyI don't use those either.
Maybe I should
consoom them to become a better internet
consoomer.
>>43172yet when he was being a monkey defending live service games at the bases of "Muh indie games"(btw he works for an Indie game with live service, that's why the defence) they were lenient, a weakness in the face of wanting to achieve something.
mister voice modulator should have been harassed into silence.
>>43180It was started to control a French company
Not what yoy actually care or know what this initiative is about
>>43295>strawmanShit like anthem shunting down might be related to SKG.
Unrelated shit like gaming layoffs that already happen beforehand doesn't, act like embracer group didn't happen.
you doing the same thing ross said what would happen but with dumber bait
>>43307>>43308>>43311cool, here comes the amerifat retard brigade with their "CEOs are proletarians too" rhetoric
>hazzigerlol burgers are so mind-raped by their constant culture wars they think correctly saying wealthy wage workers or artisans are not part of the proletariat is like le barista discourse
>>43315Kill yourself, creative workers are proletarians just like teachers and nurses
Your burger hate is not a coherent ideology
>>43324>gamers>"consoomer"i don't care, opinion discarded regardless.
it's still unrelated to SKG but shitty
e-celeb related BS
>>43333>you're like the only person here who thinks an ECI would be able to meaningfully address working conditions in Europe???, uh no I don't? Just pointing out the actual problems with the games industry is not endorsing or thinking the ECI is gonna do anything or can do anything, its just juxtaposing the cynical individualistic demands of the "gamers" who want their games not to be "destroyed" (even though its complete bs, no games are being destroyed and those that are unplayable are literally designed that way, every multiplayer game has a expiration date unless it has lan which is not gonna be how most of these games function today) vs the actual reality of the industry (something these gaymers are literally not a part of, the actual labor and production of games).
>At any rate anything that challenges if only a little bit encroaching IP rent seeking is OK by me because it's one of the biggest tentacles of monopoly capitalIf you actually read the faq, they do not seek to challenge this at all. They don't want to end games as a service or even force a company to give up its IP. So there is no challenge to anything!
<No, we would not require the company to give up any of its intellectual property rights, only allow players to continue running the game they purchased.They even undercut thier message by stating they think companies can end support to games whenever they want.
<We are in favor of publishers ending support for a game whenever they choose. Its feckless treatler "we don't hate the corporation just their practices" slop.
<No, the market demand and profitability of these games means the video games industry has an ongoing interest in selling these. Since our proposals do not interfere with existing business models, these types of games can remain just as profitable, ensuring their survival.Its total bs. Live service
is the problem. Companies do not let buyers know they are technically renting a service rather than buying a game product. If that was made clearer, like how steam early access games let the consumers know that the game they buy might get abandoned, that can affect sales and eventual change on part of devs and publishers. Avoiding going after the profitability of such practices makes this "movement" a total wet dog fart.
>>43334I think youre honestly a bit stupid in that you fail to recognize that the initiative is preempting obvious counters from game publishers. What's at stake is not "long term support" but purchases granting ownership of a commodity instead of the current legalese which only lends the user a license
>force a company to give up its IP. SThis is a stupid pipe dream that would be instantly dismissed, you're honestly retarded sorry
>>43337You cannot do shit to stop genocide. You don't, no one with working morality has capability or willingness to stop it
You CAN however stop companies from touching bideo games
>>43339>You have intellectual property brain worms.???
>It's easy in principle to make source code publicIt really is not nor is it something that this petition even asks for.
>>43327>It perfectly shows the man-child tinged false-consciousness of the consumer-centric zeitgeist.Woah it's
bloodgasm, the Don Juan of Cyberpunk 2077! ( ˘ ³˘)♥
Unique IPs: 47