[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/gulag_archive/ - Gulag Archive

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
Not reporting is bourgeois
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1656087013359.jpg (70.58 KB, 600x399, bastards.jpg)

 

So, are we just gonna pretend that Roe v Wade wasn't just overturned?

WTF IS GOING ON? Why is this country turning back into another MAGA circlejerk circus? This paired with the gun rulings they've made recently feels like the right are starting to win.(least obvious polyp)
133 posts and 15 image replies omitted.

>>1817
>you should take care of your own kids
>you should take care of your own kids
Sir this is a leftist board.
>>1832
You were implying population has never been a problem before in history or pre-history.
This is demonstrably false.
>33

>>>1031027

File: 1656092998663.png (517.67 KB, 703x681, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1815
Because the life of an already born women matters more than a barely sentient piece of matter.
Consider going to the cross, just like your leader.

>>1834
woman*

>>1832
I read every word
> Strange
>how
>homo sapiens
> never
> had
>a
>problem
>with
>having
>kids
>…. until now
If you want to move the goal post, go ahead, but don’t come at my reading comp or I’ll shove your own words back down your throat.

>>1833
These trash posts aren't worth getting this upset over.

>>1833
What is wrong with having responsivity for your own kids, nobody will ever be invested as the parents? How is it supposed to work?

>>1750
You think the right to perform abortion is idpol?

Yes, I do declare leftypol officially retarded. KILL YOURSELF.

>>1838
Xir probably believe in abolishing families as "reactionary" , and have the children be brought up in special raising facilities or some shit

>>1839
Technically it’s babby idpol on the right.
The anti-idpol position is typically the abortion one.

>>1836
Instead of some modicum of understanding you go straight to insulting me. First of all do you understand my point? People have always had kids, and we are super rich compared to history.

Second question where did i move the goal post? What are you talking about

>>1699
I don't know why I come here anymore, this place is a cesspool of right wing reactionary thought processes and incel losers who are never going to get women pregnant anyway. Anyone thinking it's good to take away women's right to abortion needs to abort themselves immediately. I'm serious, you guys are fucking dumbasses. You are NOT "left" and you are not communists.

>>1842
Yes, I dare insult you and I’ll do it again:
> Strange
>how
>homo sapiens
> never
> had
>a
>problem
>with
>having
>kids
>…. until now
If you meant something else, then you’re a retard for not writing that to begin with.

>>1842
Buddy, your post was retarded. The reason that abortion is a topic now, rather than prior in history, is because technological development (including medicine) has facilitated a platform for the debate to take place.
Everyone is aware of this. You aren't smart for questioning the existence of the platform. In fact, it makes you fucking stupid for practicing skepticism of the useless sort.

File: 1656093516536.png (48.83 KB, 423x565, wokefash.png)

>I don't know why I come here anymore, this place is a cesspool of right wing reactionary thought processes and incel losers who are never going to get women pregnant anyway. Anyone thinking it's good to take away women's right to abortion needs to abort themselves immediately. I'm serious, you guys are fucking dumbasses. You are NOT "left" and you are not communists.

>>1846
Communism is when you tell women they have to engage in forced birthing to create more workers for the capitalist system

No leftypolaks, reproduction is not identity politics. Lmfao

>>1844
It's a super simple sentence, that you don't understand.


This is you, right?

"The elites are happy that working class people kill their children in the womb instead of adressing the exploitative economic situation that makes having children a financially burdening situation in the first place."

File: 1656093732652.jpg (5.76 KB, 228x221, 1613084028658.jpg)

>>1846
>>1847
this retard the rate of profit is based on population growth, thats enough of a marxism reason to support abortion literally on its own. This bullshit has probably expanded the lifespan of capitalism by at least 5-10 years if not more

>>1850
Sir how does population growth affect rate of profit?

>>1850
Problem is most users here never read Marx

>>1845
No! This is still a moral question, and you are wrong to assume your made up positions are/should be world default!

>>1852
Where did Marx expound the relationship between population and the withering of capitalism again?
Also, please quote him for me on the term "Marxism".

>>1853
What the fuck are you talking about.

>>1853
Whichever side you are on, "it's a moral question" bitch are you a Marxist or not? Get the FUCK off my leftypol.

>>1854
In Volume 3 of Kapital you fucking pseud.

>>1849
It is a very simple sentence, which is why it’s incredible you don’t understand your own wordsmanship.
Also, yeah, that’s not even me. lel

>>1857
Exact page, please.

File: 1656094035016.jpg (166.2 KB, 800x1154, 800px-Jefferson_Davis.jpg)

>>1818
Strange how homo sapiens never had a problem with working as slaves… until now

>>1859
You can spend all day trolling here but can't use a search engine? Fuck off

>>1855
I am talking about why should be blindly adhere to axioms that you propose

>>1861
Are you object, because he never goes into that relationship? Because the poster made it up, because he is a fucking moron who actually never read Marx but just throws the name around for valor?

>>1862
Take your meds, buddy.

>>1864
How original, now quoting Sigmund Fraud

>>1860
No, you had slave revolts before. Are you supposed to show me some grand truth with this language use?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanj_Rebellion

>>1779
>>1850
Actually, it's based on the gradual replacement of humans with machinery, you fucking imbecile.

>>1867
The population size is a big factor of it too faggot

>>1863
Here you go faggot. Ctrl+F for population. He literally talks about population growth. Kill yourself

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch13.htm

>>1869
How would that apply to exploding population of Africa, they will have a lot of extra profit?

>bumplocked
What the fuck?

>>1866
And abortion issues were already being raised back in the 19th century. A movement being newer doesn't make it illegitimate.

Does this really need to be bumplocked? Not everything belongs in a cancerous "general" thread.

>>1812
There’s genuinely nothing sadder than an American confined to his worldview.

>>1874
They’re the most brainwashed and propagandized people in history. It’s severely stunted their ability to think critically or creatively.

>>1871
>>1873
Its deservedly locked for being filled with reactionary idpol.

>>1876
So if any asshole fills up a thread with "reactionary idpol", just shut the whole discussion down? Thanks for the tip, now we know how to kill any discussion we don't like others having.

>>1700
fpbp by far lmao

How do we go about defeating the fascists again? Communists did it before we can do it again

>>1877
I don't like when they censor but neither side of this debate has much to do with socialism/communism except for dividing the working class with wedge issues

>>1874
Who are you comparing Americans to?

>>1880
Working class is divided on the issue, not everybody is pro abortion


Unique IPs: 18
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /