So, are we just gonna pretend that Roe v Wade wasn't just overturned?
WTF IS GOING ON? Why is this country turning back into another MAGA circlejerk circus? This paired with the gun rulings they've made recently feels like the right are starting to win.(least obvious polyp)
133 posts and 15 image replies omitted.>>1817>you should take care of your own kids>you should take care of your own kidsSir this is a leftist board.
>>1832You were implying population has never been a problem before in history or pre-history.
This is demonstrably false.
>33
>>>1031027 >>1815Because the life of an already born women matters more than a barely sentient piece of matter.
Consider going to the cross, just like your leader.
>>1832I read every word
> Strange >how >homo sapiens> never> had >a >problem >with >having >kids>…. until nowIf you want to move the goal post, go ahead, but don’t come at my reading comp or I’ll shove your own words back down your throat.
>>1833These trash posts aren't worth getting this upset over.
>>1833What is wrong with having responsivity for your own kids, nobody will ever be invested as the parents? How is it supposed to work?
>>1750You think the right to perform abortion is idpol?
Yes, I do declare leftypol officially retarded. KILL YOURSELF.
>>1838Xir probably believe in abolishing families as "reactionary" , and have the children be brought up in special raising facilities or some shit
>>1839Technically it’s babby idpol on the right.
The anti-idpol position is typically the abortion one.
>>1836Instead of some modicum of understanding you go straight to insulting me. First of all do you understand my point? People have always had kids, and we are super rich compared to history.
Second question where did i move the goal post? What are you talking about
>>1699I don't know why I come here anymore, this place is a cesspool of right wing reactionary thought processes and incel losers who are never going to get women pregnant anyway. Anyone thinking it's good to take away women's right to abortion needs to abort themselves immediately. I'm serious, you guys are fucking dumbasses. You are NOT "left" and you are not communists.
>>1842Yes, I dare insult you and I’ll do it again:
> Strange >how >homo sapiens> never> had >a >problem >with >having >kids>…. until nowIf you meant something else, then you’re a retard for not writing that to begin with.
>>1842Buddy, your post was retarded. The reason that abortion is a topic now, rather than prior in history, is because technological development (including medicine) has facilitated a platform for the debate to take place.
Everyone is aware of this. You aren't smart for questioning the existence of the platform. In fact, it makes you fucking stupid for practicing skepticism of the useless sort.
>>1846Communism is when you tell women they have to engage in forced birthing to create more workers for the capitalist system
No leftypolaks, reproduction is not identity politics. Lmfao
>>1844It's a super simple sentence, that you don't understand.
This is you, right?
"The elites are happy that working class people kill their children in the womb instead of adressing the exploitative economic situation that makes having children a financially burdening situation in the first place."
>>1850Sir how does population growth affect rate of profit?
>>1850Problem is most users here never read Marx
>>1845No! This is still a moral question, and you are wrong to assume your made up positions are/should be world default!
>>1852Where did Marx expound the relationship between population and the withering of capitalism again?
Also, please quote him for me on the term "Marxism".
>>1853What the fuck are you talking about.
>>1853Whichever side you are on, "it's a moral question" bitch are you a Marxist or not? Get the FUCK off my leftypol.
>>1854In Volume 3 of Kapital you fucking pseud.
>>1849It is a very simple sentence, which is why it’s incredible you don’t understand your own wordsmanship.
Also, yeah, that’s not even me. lel
>>1857Exact page, please.
>>1859You can spend all day trolling here but can't use a search engine? Fuck off
>>1855I am talking about why should be blindly adhere to axioms that you propose
>>1861Are you object, because he never goes into that relationship? Because the poster made it up, because he is a fucking moron who actually never read Marx but just throws the name around for valor?
>>1862Take your meds, buddy.
>>1864How original, now quoting Sigmund Fraud
>>1860No, you had slave revolts before. Are you supposed to show me some grand truth with this language use?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanj_Rebellion >>1779>>1850Actually, it's based on the gradual replacement of humans with machinery, you fucking imbecile.
>>1867The population size is a big factor of it too faggot
>>1863Here you go faggot. Ctrl+F for population. He literally talks about population growth. Kill yourself
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch13.htm >>1869How would that apply to exploding population of Africa, they will have a lot of extra profit?
>bumplocked
What the fuck?
>>1866And abortion issues were already being raised back in the 19th century. A movement being newer doesn't make it illegitimate.
Does this really need to be bumplocked? Not everything belongs in a cancerous "general" thread.
>>1812There’s genuinely nothing sadder than an American confined to his worldview.
>>1874They’re the most brainwashed and propagandized people in history. It’s severely stunted their ability to think critically or creatively.
>>1871>>1873Its deservedly locked for being filled with reactionary idpol.
>>1876So if any asshole fills up a thread with "reactionary idpol", just shut the whole discussion down? Thanks for the tip, now we know how to kill any discussion we don't like others having.
How do we go about defeating the fascists again? Communists did it before we can do it again
>>1877I don't like when they censor but neither side of this debate has much to do with socialism/communism except for dividing the working class with wedge issues
>>1874Who are you comparing Americans to?
>>1880Working class is divided on the issue, not everybody is pro abortion
Unique IPs: 18