So, are we just gonna pretend that Roe v Wade wasn't just overturned?
WTF IS GOING ON? Why is this country turning back into another MAGA circlejerk circus? This paired with the gun rulings they've made recently feels like the right are starting to win.(least obvious polyp)
>>1699Based and redpilled
The Cross is victorious
>>1728Where did someone question his sexuality?
>NewfagOh… then lurk more newfag
>>1726so youre rly new hm?
If you try to type the n word it will make it, well, lemme show you, uygha
we have another few. You may be surprised that i q shows up as autism score!
and its generally fine to insult here, were not politically correct. Ots in the name you see. Just dont be a dick and attack people for no reason.
Anyway fag is ust a word like dude. Doesnt mean youre homosexual. In fact I think homosexuals and fags arent the same thing but whatever.
>>1734I think there?
>>742065But we're not reddit, theres no giant set of rules you have to read otr get banned. As long you act in good faith youll be allright. Were genuine commies (and some anarchists) but a bit special propably.
Theres no list of word filters imho, it are not so many.
>>1750You say it is just another idpol issue like it should be discarded but it cannot.
You can denounce it as an attempt to split the working class sure but you still must fight it regardless. You cannot help it if some choose reaction and there is nothing else to do with them.
>>1760Social programs are an alternative to poverty.
Abortion is an alternative to pregnancy.
By your logic, all forms of birth control as well as the adoption industry are reactionary.
>>1769I sweat to God, i did no such thing.
>>1775Are you being facetious? "Reproductive slavery?"
>>1771>is there a "communist" position on abortion? Abortion is a societal ill but banning it under capitalism is criminal.
Under socialism there would be steps taken to minimize abortion. I don't mind socialist states like Stalinist USSR banning or limiting it either as they took steps to make sure motherhood isn't an economic burden
>>1790>I see, so foetus doesn't matter?Yes
> Ok. What about Man?What?
>>1793>>except unborn women though lolYes? Not the own you think it is.
>>1787You wouldn't want to live under the CCP because you are an anti-social, inhuman monster made that way by the abnormal deformations imposed by liberal capitalism.
For example, as Covid-19 has show, you think it's correct to kill millions of people to support market efficiency, and naturally evaluate the lives of one person versus another based on their value as human labor (young, vs old), and conclude that choosing to kill old people is a correct choice. Life is cheap and plentiful in the Occident, and people who live under their heinous system simply devalue the lives of others in favor of their own, and do not understand community or society.
>>1796jup. Could never support complete ban tho. For unconsenting sex it should always stay an option. Still, like 80% of women at least say they took abortion cause they cant afford to raise a child.
And the other 20%, I dont mind when they do what they want to. But I also think abortion is a societal ill.
>>1805I dont care if you don't pay your taxes, anon. I don't pay mine either.
Try to stay on topic.
>>1815Lifetime of being told that life starts way later than it does in reality.
Granted, abortion in early term is a-okay and should remain in all cases.
>>1811What about 3 abortions?
-Female
-State - doesn't pay child support since you should take care of your own kids
-Man - doesn't pay child support since you should take care of your own kids
>>1816According to Christian theology life starts at the quickening.
This 'conception' bullshit is a meme that has been invented in the 1970s.
>>1819What ideology!!
Fertilisation or fertilization (see spelling differences), also known as generative fertilisation, syngamy and impregnation,[1] is the fusion of gametes to give rise to a new individual organism or offspring and initiate its development.
>>1817>you should take care of your own kids>you should take care of your own kidsSir this is a leftist board.
>>1832You were implying population has never been a problem before in history or pre-history.
This is demonstrably false.
>33
>>>1031027 >>1815Because the life of an already born women matters more than a barely sentient piece of matter.
Consider going to the cross, just like your leader.
>>1832I read every word
> Strange >how >homo sapiens> never> had >a >problem >with >having >kids>…. until nowIf you want to move the goal post, go ahead, but don’t come at my reading comp or I’ll shove your own words back down your throat.
>>1750You think the right to perform abortion is idpol?
Yes, I do declare leftypol officially retarded. KILL YOURSELF.
>>1839Technically it’s babby idpol on the right.
The anti-idpol position is typically the abortion one.
>>1836Instead of some modicum of understanding you go straight to insulting me. First of all do you understand my point? People have always had kids, and we are super rich compared to history.
Second question where did i move the goal post? What are you talking about
>>1842Yes, I dare insult you and I’ll do it again:
> Strange >how >homo sapiens> never> had >a >problem >with >having >kids>…. until nowIf you meant something else, then you’re a retard for not writing that to begin with.
>>1842Buddy, your post was retarded. The reason that abortion is a topic now, rather than prior in history, is because technological development (including medicine) has facilitated a platform for the debate to take place.
Everyone is aware of this. You aren't smart for questioning the existence of the platform. In fact, it makes you fucking stupid for practicing skepticism of the useless sort.
>>1844It's a super simple sentence, that you don't understand.
This is you, right?
"The elites are happy that working class people kill their children in the womb instead of adressing the exploitative economic situation that makes having children a financially burdening situation in the first place."
>>1852Where did Marx expound the relationship between population and the withering of capitalism again?
Also, please quote him for me on the term "Marxism".
>>1849It is a very simple sentence, which is why it’s incredible you don’t understand your own wordsmanship.
Also, yeah, that’s not even me. lel
Unique IPs: 53