/labor/ - Labor

Nah, depends on your morals but generally nah.
- Marx did
- You can invest in chinese stuff
- You can use the money on your local orgs

>>1177
>immoral
lmao

if youre petit bourgeois just own it

>>1177
Depends what you do with the returns, if you use some of it for the good of others/the labour movement then sure, why not invest

>>1180
>Depends what you do with the returns
it doesnt. whether you use it to compete better, waste it on funko pops or give it to charity to pat yourself on the back doesnt change your class position if thats what the retarded op means by """immoral by leftist standards""" (lol)

>>1181
>if thats what the retarded op means by """immoral by leftist standards"""
Leftists have different moral standards than right wingers. Right wingers justify ruining the environment and fucking kids because of Christianity and shit.

Yes. All bourgeois degeneracies are bad. Investing, profiteering, prostitution, hoarding, idleness, theoretical hesitation and psychological weakness, artistic decadence and individualism, foreign dependency, imperialist thinking, usage or possession of capitalist intoxicants, lending, speculating, any hesitation in revolutionary violence, urban parasitism, any hesitation in the cessation of bourgeois degeneracies, or any participation of any degree of capitalism, etc.—whether by word, deed, or thought—are bad.

>>1182
Well issue is that leftists have a completely different relation to morality as a concept, and thus more varying morals and some–such as the egoists–that reject morality as a concept in favor of other frameworks.

>>1186
>Well issue is that leftists have a completely different relation to morality as a concept
Wrong. Only Marxists-Leninist grasp morality. You are amoral bourgeois moral relativist dog. Lumpen deviants, trotskyite wreckers, unsound petty-bourgeois anarchists can neither be called leftist nor grasp morality.
>thus more varying morals
Wrong. There is no morality but the one true, absolute, scientific morality of Marxism-Leninism. There is no variation. Proletarian vanguard formulate ONE CORRECT LINE. It is right to serve proletarians and wrong to betray them.
>some–such as the egoists–that reject morality as a concept in favor of other frameworks.
THERE IS NO FRAMEWORK OUTSIDE OF THE OBJECTIVE MATERIAL LAWS OF HISTORY. MORALITY IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE WILL OF MAN. MORALITY IS NOT OF DEBATE. MORALITY CANNOT BE REJECTED. TO EVEN SUGGEST THAT "MORALITY CAN BE REJECTED" IS TO PROMOTE THE MOST VILE FORM OF BOURGEOIS DEGENERACY

>>1182
I mean, it can still help though. giving money to a communist party means: better propaganda, better outreach, ability to participate in elections without breaking the bank, paid positions within the party for full time work, and generally better organisation - and in the future, potentially the ability to buy weapons

The bolsheviks needed money too, thats why they robbed banks