There is a new video on the INDEP youtube channel:
Talk with Al Campbell - Protagonistic Planned Socialism (PROPLASO) and Human Development26 minutes in he repeats the usual hysteria by mainstream economists about voting: He claims Arrow's Impossibility Theorem shows the impossibility of aggregating ranked preferences into a group preference in a way that the result is fair and rational according to specific technical-mathematical demands… Hrrrrmpf I hate when people talk like that. Arrow's theorem really showed the impossibility of
guaranteeing such a result, saying nothing about the probability of that actually happening aside from it being above zero. So I'm checking Campbell's paper
Moving Beyond Capitalism (2022) on his website
https://dac27.ch/ and there he actually correctly states that "no aggregation process can always guarantee" such result and that there is a "search for procedures that are “as good as possible.”"
Well IMHO this search is pretty much over since we arrived at methods that satisfy something called Independence of Smith-Dominated Alternatives. Schulze Condorcet and MAM (Maximized Affirmed Majorities) are about as good as it gets, since they also give you reversal symmetry, independence of clones, and mono-raise. Look up that stuff, you will enjoy it (if you got Autism).
What Campbell does both in that paper and his talk is that he distances himself from the standard assumption of socially atomized people with fixed opinions. He seems to believe that social interactions strongly reduce the frequency of the problem Arrow pointed out (perhaps even reduce it to nothing?), but in neither paper nor talk does he actually model that. That said, it's intuitive enough to imagine
some reduction if we believe that talking to each other tends to make views more similar.
Pretty vague overall and he seems to have no algorithms.