What's the real story behind the Soviet deportations during WW2 because even MLs say that it was a bad thing but that feels like capitulation that Stalin is as bad as the Nazis as it was an ethnic cleansing from how it's described by western liberal historians
Nothing ever happened, evacuations of civilians during war are a good thing, would do it again
Basically Crimean tatars and some Caucasus people like Chechens had an unusually high amount of traitors and collaborators, so they got wholesale deported. Don't really know about the others.
t. Russian
Sorry, Nazis should get punished. Not sorry!
the chechens deserved it
>>2506962>Don't ask why Turkmenistan has the best Korean food outside of Koreathe soviet union inadvertently cross-pollinating cultures?
>>2507047I am actually, thank god I am no longer lulled to sleep by bourgeois society and morals
>>2506216So it did happen but they deserved it?
>>2507049like "genocide bad"?
Petty small nations should be destroyed anyway, and will be absorbed come the triumph of Communism regardless.
>>2507151Jews will survive communism
>>2507160Nation and the state are not feudal remnants
>>2507161Yes they are. You should look into how the state as we understand it developed.
>>2507154jews aren't a nation
>>2507164Absolute monarchies that gave birth to capitalism later weren’t feudal at all either.
>>2507160nonsense
>>2507170yes they are
>>2507185>yes they arezionist delusion
>but that feels like capitulation that Stalin is as bad as the Nazis
In what sense is anybody saying that? The closest equivalent of the Soviet deportations is probably Japanese internment. They moved populations suspected of disloyalty away from critical areas during the war, and afterwards moved them back. Even if you believe in the worst version of these events, how is that even remotely comparable to the industrialized extermination of entire nations because they are considered less than human?
>>2507170Jews lacked a single common language, instead speaking the languages of their host countries (e.g., Yiddish in some communities, but also Russian, Polish, etc.)
Jews were dispersed across different countries and continents without their own contiguous territory, living as minorities within other nations
Jews were not bound into a single, unified economic system. Their economic activities were integrated into the various countries and regions where they lived
While different Jewish communities might have their own distinct cultural traits, this does not manifest as a single, unified national culture shared by all Jews worldwide
So no, Jews are not a nation.
>>2507198You don't even know what nation means
>>2507201Illuminate me, anarkiddie
>>2507197Because Japanese internment was done in a country that had been practically untouched by WWII, whereas the Soviets did their deportations knowing full well that they had not had adequate food if a disaster happened, which obvious would happen because they were supposed to be agricultural producers, whereas the Japanese-Americans were fed by the state since they were doing manufacturing work. The Soviet deportees had to produce their own subsistence, in a foreign environment they had no prior exposure to. For example the Crimean Tatars were deported to an area with endemic Malaria, when they had no exposure to Malaria beforehand. This caused a large death toll before the Soviets rushed with vaccinations after the fact.
Also, the deportations were intended to be permanent under Stalin. They only reversed them in the Khrushchev era.
>>2507198>Jews lacked a single common languageSo did Ukrainians. Didn't stop Lenin from creating Ukraine and reinventing a Frankenstein Ukrainian language. France before the French Revolution likewise did not have French as a dominant language but instead multiple regional ones.
>Jews were dispersed across different countries and continents without their own contiguous territory, living as minorities within other nationsYou can only be dispersed elsewhere if you originally had a home and were kicked out. It was the Roman and Babylonian Empires that did the dispersing.
>Jews were not bound into a single, unified economic system. Their economic activities were integrated into the various countries and regions where they livedDo capitalism, feudalism, or slave societies not count as economic systems now?
>does not manifest as a single, unified national culture shared by all Jews worldwideA nation is by definition not worldwide. Your antisemitism is so intense you don't even realize you're contradicting yourself.
>>2507280>Didn't stop Lenin from creating Ukrainewhat a great man
>>2507280>Do capitalism, feudalism, or slave societies not count as economic systems now? too universal for particular application
>A nation is by definition not worldwidenational culture.
try to keep up
>>2506171The real story is that they did it more or less how it is described, but with a lot less dramatization. It generally wasn't any ethnic cleansing except a few particular cases like operation lentil, which was not carried out with the express purpose of annihilated the caucauses people but did in effect result in large scale ethnic cleansing (But it was mostly undone in the 80s so no harm no foul, right?)
>>2507066☝️🤓 Actually, it's "ethnic cleansing bad"
>>2507290
Old people, new methods.
Of course they didn't understand clearly the matters yet.
The habits of the past weigh down upon their actions.
That's why I'm optimistic with the future generations, because different from us, they are much more free from the past than us. They're born in an era where walls between ethnics are gradually disappearing, thanks to computers and informatics.
I'm not saying that ethnics will disappear, but it doesn't matter anymore. You can type with your native language here and I can still understand it just by hitting the translate button or copying it to chatgpt
>>2506171>Stalin is as bad as the Nazis as it was an ethnic cleansing from how it's described by western liberal historians1. It was ethnic deportations, like it or not- but if you're seeking morality from western liberal historians you probably know they're as hypocritical, in the sense they'll condemn Stalin, but not George Washington, Biden, The Clintons, Obama or Churchill- who, if we lived in a just world, would be on trial at the Hague.
2. While Stalin has a lot to answer for in terms of the ethnic deportations, homophobic laws, betrayal of communists in Greece/Spain, the backing of bourgoise republicans/factions in China/Spain over the communists and his anti-abortion laws, Stalin was, and objectively IS better than the Nazis.
Point to me where Stalin ordered the mass
enslavements of entire populations.
Point to me where Stalin collaborated with private companies to lead anti-union movements.
Point to me where Stalin reduced women within his government as mere brood maids and mothers.
Stalin, and the USSR more broadly, had a hand in backing partisan groups in Eastern Europe/parts of the Balkans.
The USSR, even under Stalin, had
some degree of democracy and land reform, wheras the Nazis were a totalitarian empire with virtually no suffrage at all- dedicated entirely to fuherprinzip.
And thirdly, let's not forget- Stalin, although certainly having a hand in these ethnic deportations, he was only part of the larger cog. We can't deny that it was folks like Beria who also had an equal hand in such a fucked policy.
Finally, the soviet union actually APOLOGISED and gave reparations to most of these ethnic groups- after Stalin died.
Can any of these so-called Western Liberal Historians point where the USA, France, Australia or god forbid, THE UK did anything similar?
Of course not.
Stalin may have been a douchebag, but he was never a Nazi nor anywhere near equivalent to one. And pointing out his crimes isn't conceding grounds to libs- addressing the truth and learning not to repeat it is a principle any communist worth their salt ought to adhere to. Can the same be said for Liberals?
>>2506962It's basically what the burgers did with Japanese internment but on a bigger scale
>>2507850I would compare it more to the Canadian Japanese Deportations, since they wanted it to be a permanent exile like the Soviets.
Of course the Canadians hadn't known a single attack on their country and had more than enough resources for themselves, while the Soviets did the deportations while having nothing to spare from the war effort.
>>2507850Kinda, except it was partially intended to be permanent, and it was only years later that it was reversed.
Shit happens. History is messy. File this one away in the "30" of Stalin being 30% bad and 70% good
>>2506171Strategic relocation of non-historic and reactionary peoples in order to further the defense of socialism. Read Engels
itt: people defend genocide rather than lapse out of the cold war chronomania
>>2508154you dont seem to know what a genocide is
kinda embarrassing when one is livestreamed right now
>>2508175i think deporting people based on ethnic status is genocidal, i think also bombing civilian areas to rubble then denying them any aid is genocidal, i also think you people should realize it's not 1977 anymore, it's over, the USSR fell, it's time to get a new strategy on how to change the world
>but that feels like capitulation that Stalin is as bad as the Nazis
>capitulation
The problem is your fetishistic obsession with a long dead politician. The idea that Stalin could have done bad things shouldn't pose a threat to your wider world view.
Of course the deportations were a horrible crime and should be condemned, but the Nazis were obviously still worse. Stop treating politics like a fandom and Stalin as your comfort character.
>>2507267That's still not comparable to industrialized extermination of entire "subhuman" nations. What you're describing is a desperate security measure taken in the midst of a war of annihilation. What the Nazis did was go out of their way and dedicate scarce resources (at the expense of their war effort) to murdering people for its own sake.
It was a crime against humanity and something no self proclaimed "communist" should have ever done. The fact that the best defense the retards in this thread can make is "b-b-but he was better than hitler" is very telling.
>>2508277>The fact that the best defense the retards in this thread can make is "b-b-but he was better than hitler" is very telling.Liberals regularly point to these deportations to try and argue that the Soviets and Nazis were equivalents, which is a stepping stone to rehabilitating the latter. I'd say it's pretty important to highlight the difference even if you aren't defending the deportations themselves.
>>2508277the best defense is that everyone did it, and ussr were by far the ones with the most justifications for it
if those population had not been touched and the collaborators among them helped the nazis slaughter people, would it be a better outcome because we could point to the communists superior morality despite potentially more deaths?
>>2508335If this is true why didn't they deport ethnic Ukranians?
>>2508789There are limits to the logistics of evacuating civilians en masse, can't save everybody
>>2508789Because there were actually very few Ukrainian collaborators relative to their population. The ratio of Ukrainians that took up arms against the USSR vs those who fought for the Red Army is about 1:35. Also almost all the collaborators were from Galicia. The idea that Ukrainians weren't enthusiastic participants and defenders of the Soviet project is Nazi propaganda.
>>2508800Is that ratio of the whole population of the UkSSR, or just the actual Ukrianians?
>>2508818That's the ratio of the combined strength of the UPA and 14th SS division (200k) vs the number of Ukrainians who served in the Red Army (7 million).
Don't fall for it guys,Soviet Union was the Russian Empire 2.0,just without Tsar system itself. Deportations were the same,russians wanted to cleanse territories from muslims,'cause it's so delicious seeing people who understand that their homeland will never be theirs again…
>>2548729There will be no islamophilia under the Soviet Republic, seethe and cope moron
>>2508137>reactionary peoplesleftypol.org
>>2548830Explain why they all loved Nazi Germany's attempted destruction of the Socialism?
It was bad and punished whole groups. Learn from the Soviets' mistake
>>2549216If it was a mistake, why was it done under the most revolutionary period of Soviet socialism (stalin era) and only reversed with the Khrushchevite counter-revolution?
>>2549218If you wanna be religious about Soviet doctrine, go to reddit
>>2549350
they were traitors to socialism
>>2549367
>system that treats you as a second class citizen based on your ethnicity
source?
>>2549429
No,that's absolutely not true,hitler and the nazis is seen as an ethereal evil like they're the fucking Nazgul,the final boss of villainy.
Mao is more rarely attacked compared to Stalin,who is seen as a paranoiac dictator who executed a bajillion people under him,and hoarded all the grain and shit.
maybe they teach it differently in Eastern Europe I don't know.
>>2506216Collective punishment is fucking stupid
>>2549452Do you also think it was wrong to expel the Germs from western poland
>>2549720provided the perfect example for the nakba to happen legally
>>2549429
I didn't deny that, I was talking about how simply admitting that the deportations happened and that they were a gross excess with a terrible human cost isn't the same thing as conceding that Stalin was as bad as Hitler. Again, even a highly uncharitable framing of these policies can at best frame them as criminally negligent, which is not the same as being deliberately murderous.
>>2549812trve, its le heckin bad to punish the people who were just raping, torturing, and massacring you. They should just be allowed to infest territories throughout Poland and the USSR and it definitely wouldn't create a new Pan-German movement.
>>2549887actual israeli-tier bullshit, and you saying this insane hitlerite drivel proves only that the logic is really the same for either, to this day germans in the czech republic are not treated as second-class citizens, despite the fact that it's been 80 years since they deported the germans from there, and likewise them punishing them for this blood-crime, could you not rephrase your sentence to be "It's le heckin bad to punish arabs for killing, raping, and massacring you, they should just be allowed to infest israel and wouldn't create a new pan-arab movement"
>>2550035>could you not rephrase your sentence to be "It's le heckin bad to punish arabs for killing, raping, and massacring you, they should just be allowed to infest israel and wouldn't create a new pan-arab movement"Except the Palestinian riots against jewish settlement were prompted by the Jews' support of the Balfour declaration, which stated that Palestine would be a Jewish state. How can you possibly compare that to the Germans launching the Holocaust and the anti-partisan operations for the sake of a German ethnostate to the A-A Line? One was against, the other for, the establishment of an ethnostate by settlers. Your comparison is actual Israeli-tier bullshit which Zionists use.
And Pan-Germanism is not at all comparable to Pan-Arabism, since Pan-Germanism was about how the German minority in countries like Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, etc weren't actually residents of their wider nations, but rather of a German nation which the wider nation was an impediment to. Pan-Arabism in Palestine was the exact opposite, seeing the Jewish minority simply residents within a wider Palestinian Arab people, whereas Israeli nationalism was the Pan-German equivalent of seeing the wider nation as an enemy to an aggressive national project of a minority. You have everything exactly backwards.
>>2550077the point is you can justify mass expulsion for any "blood crime", not that they are equal crimes
>>2549887It is bad to hold to a fascist theory of blood guilt and pretend to be a Marxist while carrying out ethnic cleansings, yea
>>2550115MLoids be like
>Uhm but the race I want to genocide is genuinely evil?I’ve genuinely seen MLoids go online and explain they are nothing like Hitler…because Hitler was a white man 💀
>>2550198Sometimes the most obsessive SU defenders also end up becoming the most effective anti communists. Ironic isn't it?
>>2550198Whoa… Anti-Hitler policies are… pro-Hitler???? whoa….. This is the great mind of Leftcommunism..
>>2506216They didn't, that's their nationalists' propaganda to justify positioning themselves as victims of communists. In reality, deportations didn't happen -there were evacuations. Note the locations they were "deported" to - safe Siberia, and newly developed and fertile lands of Kazakhstan. Add to this legal protections, lack of typical punishments such as Americans refusing Japanese interned the right to vote and right to assembly, compensations for their lost property in full, etc etc, and you qucikly will udnerstand what this was actually about
>>2507785There were more Russians "deported" to Siberia than any other ethnic group. Your argument is dead from the get go. Russian Nazis love to call Russian "deported" kulaks
>>2507267>This caused a large death tollAh yes, more anticommunist victimhood fantasies. Suffice it to say, death tolls of malaria and train transfers were projected from eyeballing of pre-deportation "REAL" population figures (e.g. author of the claim "researched" Soviet demographics data and had declared it fake and conspiracy to hide population loss and genocide) and then looking at actual population and then put out difference as the number genocided. THEN, and only THEN does the explanation - like malaria - comes to make sense of WHY THE FUCK IS OUR FANTASY POPULATION NUMBER DOESN'T MATCH REALITY.
You can see it done by EVERY anticommunist "researcher" of ANY nation, Ukrainians, Georgians, Chechens, Finnish, Russians, everyone - eyeballing "real" figures based on anything at all they can project up, because of le "Stalin repressed 1936 population census, therefore any numbers coming of Soviet government must be a conspiracy to hide genocide" meme. There's no other proof, it's only THIS, and then popular folklore aka fantasies of repressions
>>2551239Note how the very simple question of
WHERE ARE THE CORPSES OF MILLIONS OF REPRESSEDwill make believers in Soviet repressions mald, because after 35 years of intense searching, they still haven't found ANYTHING, not in USSR, not in China, not even in Cambodia. At best they'll show you medieval era corpses, dead from sword slashes to their heads (aka Pol Pot hoeing intellectuals to the heads as a method of execution, lmao), at worst - Ukrainians unearthing 4000 b.c. corpses and declaring them victims of Stalin
>>2551235This. The Commmunists rescued the petty nations from Nazism and they will never forgive them for it.
The NKVD heroes simply wanted to give the Little Eichmanns more productive and fertile land than they could have dreamed of out East. But they were so devoted to Hitlerism that they committed suicide en masse on the trains, against the desperate intervention by the brave servants of Communism, in order to sabotage the expression of goodwill and frame the Soviets. Decades later, "Communists" still slander the glorious memory of the Soviet gift-givers, whose only crime was to think the Hitlerite peoples, who became a backbone of the Khrushchevites, could be allies of Socialism if given favorable lush lands. Make it make sense.
>>2551307>>2551310>they committed suicide en masse on the trainsAlready covered your nonsense
<death tolls of malaria and train transfers were projected from eyeballing of pre-deportation "REAL" population figures (e.g. author of the claim "researched" Soviet demographics data and had declared it fake and conspiracy to hide population loss and genocide) and then looking at actual population and then put out difference as the number genocided
>who became a backbone of the KhrushchevitesThey didn't, though? Koreans, for example, straight up refused to move back to the Far East, they liked -stans more than their old homeland, even in the 90s, when South Korea tried really hard for Berlin Wall 2.0 and also to annex parts of Russia's Far East, they couldn't make them return. Chechens, while technically returning to Chechnya, weren't actually returning to their ancestral lands in the mountain vales - they moved into Russian-populated lowlands, because Khruschev, unlike Stalin, didn't provide returnees WITH BASIC FUCKING AMENITIES AND HOUSING, so local governments had to improvise to somehow make space for Chechens. Meanwhile, in Kazakhstan, Kazakhs have seized without compensation Chechen lands.
THIS SHIT is what both Chechens and Crimean Tatars project onto Stalin and make out as a continuous Stalinist policy of repressions. Add to this retarded beliefs like train deaths, and religious anticommunist idiocy, and you get unironic posters like this
>>2551307 >>2551310>>2551318The Koreans were not deported to Special Settlements, and were not deported because of the Great Patriotic War, so I have no idea why you even bring them up.
>>2551245somewhat trve…
>Cambodiachoueng ek (most famous killing field) used to be a chinese cemetery, second picrel is a tomb with chinese inscriptions
Supposedly many of the people deported were chuds
They should be bowing to Stalin statues every day, but the Hitlerites instead curse their savior Joseph Vissarionovich. All he did was reward them with a land of plenty, which Stalin gratefully sought to permanently confine them in forever so they could really appreciate the new scenery. All this when they should have been rightfully executed and they dare scorn him for it.
>>2551318>They didn't, though? Oh Tovarisch, you focus on the wrong pack of Hitlerites. The Khrushchevite revisionists, wanting to ensure a stable social basis for their reaction, enlisted the help of the reactionary peoples by permitting their infestation in the lands which were rightfully claimed by the revolutionary peoples.
Stalin's only mistake was allowing the Khrushchevites to re-infest the lands which he just made purely revolutionary. If only they were simply executed Khrushchev wouldn't be able to secure revisionism by re-infiltrating reactionary peoples throughout the Motherland. The Soviet Union would still be around today if the revisionism enabled by the reactionary nations were pulled at the root.
>>2551351If Korean Autonomous Republic in the Far East happened, there would have been scary stories (with documents proving them!!!1) about horrors of Korean deportations. In fact, there probably are something like this in Kazakhstan and South Korea
>>2551354Obviously, they've just excavated corpses out of a Chinese cemetery and claimed without any proof that the skulls they've shown to the world were of Pol Pot's victims
>>2551357And ethnic Chechens in Kazakhstan advancing to positions of republican power were also repressed - who would in their sane mind want to rule over KAZAKHS?! Who in their sane mind would want to have their repressed nationality represented in Kazakhstan?!
Why Chechens weren't repressed in voting rights? Why weren't Chechen councils outlawed? Did Stalin not fear that genocided peoples would scream about their bad treatment everywhere, that they won't turn to banditism and rebellion? Why?!?!? Why did 10000 Chechens repressed to Kazakhstan were awarded various Soviet medals, including 22 Heroes of the SOviet Union?
Explain to me IN DETAIL how it's fucking possible that Chechens, who apparently lost half their population on trains, were extremely loyal to USSR and Stalin and there were ZERO talks anywhere about bad treatment? How did repressions function that nobody fucking suspected any train nonsense until 1990s?
>>2551391>>2551357Oh, I am forgetting something. You see, in Soviet laws, repressed peoples - like kulaks and nobility and capitalists - were DENIED A RIGHT TO VOTE. Especially those who were sent to Siberia into exile. If Chechens and Tatars were indeed repressed, why no denial of voting rights? Why were there special exceptions made this one time, breaking Soviet laws otherwise upheld before and after the deportations?
https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F_58_%D0%A3%D0%9A_%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%A4%D0%A1%D0%A0 This article, for example, broadly covers anti-Soviet activity - and all or most of sub-articles mention 2-3 years of additional denial of voting rights, including denial of the right to get elected. Yet, we know for a fact that Chechens and Crimean Tatars WERE getting elected to positions of power during their supposed repression
You know how liars always get exposed the more they get talked to? How liars eventually say some shit that goes in opposition to other known facts? Yep, whole nonsense about repressed peoples headbutts into a wall of facts that contradict the narrative. IF THE VERY FUCKING STUPID IDEA THAT HALF THE POPULATION DIED ON TRAINS WASN'T A DEAD GIVEAWAY BECAUSE IT'S SUCH A FUCKING FANTASY IDEA
>>2551391Excuse me Comrade, but the evil Chechens were not loyal to our dearest Marshal Joseph Vissarionovich. They in fact pledged their loyalties to the Germans, and dreamed of a genocide of the heroic Russian people. Thankfully, Stalin contained them into Special Settlements to ensure their evil machinations would never be let loose upon the beautiful Soviet Union.
>>2506171It was absolutely ethnic cleansing, still nowhere near as bad as the Nazis though, or even the trail of tears etc
>>2551401>continues ironic malding>>2551402If it was cleansing, where are the corpses?
If it was ethnic, why were Russians most affected by deportations?
>>2551406Ethnic cleansing doesn't even need to mean killing people you know
>>2551401Just so that we honest folks know what an idiot we are dealing with,
what's your opinion on Uyghur genocide that's totally happening right this moment, with millions dead and repressed?
What about Falun Gong secret radio broadcasts, where they are calling for help as CCP dismembers them for organs?
>displaces everyone
<why so many rootless cosmopolitans??
Typical stalin
>>2551407Do you also believe in great replacement? That's technically ethnic cleansing too, you know/
>>2551406Actual fucking retard doesn't even know the definition of an ethnic cleansing but makes sure to post a smug picture to illustrate how knowledgeable and smug he is LMAO
>>2551412It doesn't involve forced population transfer so no.
>>2551448>forced population transferOh course if we just bring out the meaningless buzzword conveniently designed so only Soviet Union gets labeled as the most evil state ever, whereas demographic change everywhere is just totally incomparable.
>>2551448Thankfully the Soviets never forced the affected populations to collaborate with the German invaders, lol. Their punishment was entirely self-inflicted.
>>2551424Furr, as far as I read him, actually agrees with some crimes, but goes to frame them as "good, ackshually".
But yeah. Not a single Soviet crime is real, once you research the sources. We don't take either Ukrainians with thier Holodomor, Poles with their Katyn, and what else seriously - then why should we take small nation nationalists seriously?
>>2551464They didn't collaborate with Germans in any significant quantities. Claims of otherwise come from Germans, who tried to portray themselves as liberators against Bolshevism, and from idiotic reading of data. Say, Germans created some national assembly for Tatars, representatives of that assembly were majority white emigre who represented who knows what, and then the represented number of people gets presented as a number of collaborators;
And as a cherry on top, Crimean Tatars got their crazy 70% anti-Soviet organization participation trophy due to "researchers" being idiots and claiming that ALL TATAR ORGANIZATIONS were ONLY for CRIMEANS TATARS; given that Tatar national assembly was composed based on pre-Revolutionary national lines, e.g. Czarist demographers thought that Crimean Tatars and Volga Tatars are the same people, and that Azerbaijani were also Caucasian Tatars
>>2551591>But yeah. Not a single Soviet crime is real, once you research the sources. We don't take either Ukrainians with thier Holodomor, Poles with their Katyn, and what else seriously - then why should we take small nation nationalists seriously? Academic rigity, control and censorship. Unfortunately butthurt belter eurofags have much more political-institutional to seriously harm or ruin your life outside of redditard three arrow apologists, grover furr is not considered a historian or a professional on his area, but as a ""genocide"" denier, unlike the MI6 plant, robert conquest, which rectified and left alot of his views, commit historical innacuracies, and is considered a expert, so is applebaum to douglas tottles.
The Polish government, with a hand of yeltsinite traitors, killed the katyn issue and closed the discussion, even with new evidence coming as also proof of even german body transfers from volyn poles massacred to katyn.
In reality, anti-communist neoliberal warriors control academic institutions and online forums to push its agenda and historical revisionism under a lense of "unbias" and "academic rigor"
>>2551385they were both victims of killing fields and random people from the old cemetery
if you're not being sarcastic >>2506966The MOMENT the chechens were allowed to move back to chechnia they kicked up a fuss again so ye they should've stayed deported
Only revolutionary peoples have a right to the fruits of socialist construction. Why should fascist nations share in that?
>>2506171>USSR deporationsBased and socialism pilled.
>lack of deportation in russian federationGay and retarded bourgeoisie policy.
>>2552074>they were bothThe last barrier before fully admitting that they all were random people from the old cemetery. They MUST HAVE told at least some truth, right? Couldn't be that they were lying, lying, and did nothing else but lie, right???
>>2556209no they also did kill people 1975-1979 democratic kampuchea period
>>2557413prove it never happen.
there are at the very least records at
https://archives.tuolsleng.gov.kh/persons of tuol sleng (security center 21 during the regime) detainees, it has been proved that most are kill (either by torture until death or executed later, as there was no gain in keeping them alive)
Those were bourgeois nations and their removal was necessary to make living space for proletarian people of Russia.
Unique IPs: 63