As blatant US aggression has been rising the past few months, from bombing Iran to colour revolutions (CIA coups) in South East Asia, trade war with China, escalations in Africa, genocides, stealing Venezuelan ships and striking Russian ones in international waters, the reaction globally has been basically non-existant. Nobody, and I mean nobody has been retaliating at all to discourage the US from this, well, terror campaign, even countries that would have more than enough means to hurt the US back. I'm not asking for war obviously, but there are many other things one could do. But instead, the world seems to have collectively decided to do nothing, which only appeases the US and encourages more aggression, because, as we know, Westerners interpret restraint as weakness.
What is the rationale behind this? I don't understand. Have all countries, run by various ideologies, suddenly lost their sense for self-preservation or is there some big 4D chess play I'm missing?
>>2594810Divide & conquer tactics work so well that building a coalition against the USA is nearly impossible. With nationalists in neighboring nations at each others throats alliances cannot be formed. USA itself is never under direct threat only its proxy states.
>>2594829I was not talking about broader alliances, but rather that even individual countries just sit there and take the US terror.
>>2594810>Westerners interpret restraint as weakness.restraint in the face of aggression is weakness. restraint in the face of stupidity is patience. restraint in the face of weakness is mercy.
the burger reich will be destroyed by its internal contradictions, not its external rivals
>>2594832Individual states would be foolish to go against entire USA block because of provocations. For example Venezuela attacking USA forces would be suicidal and exactly what USA would want and need for a casus belli.
>>2594810Fire cannot be fought with fire. Nations like Communist China and Korea do fight back against imperialist agression. Amerika is dying lion. The nations you say do nothing are the powerful herd of elephants who will live peacefully and prosperously as the old lion dies, trampling its bones into dust. For China to drop bomb on amerika, a society entirely of genocidal maniacs built 100% to rape and destroy, is not the nature of the peaceful powerful elephant.
>>2594836Read the OP please. Not what I suggested. But for the sake of argument, it seems other countries are allergic to using proxies to inflict some violence on the US and its proxies. Why not have a random Westoid ship be sunk by some "random" drone?
>>2594838>The USA is dying>Trust the planI need some material evidence for this. I know that part of US current terror campaign is to appear strong. If it's really a papaer tiger, the best counter would be to sanction key products that the US military industrial complex needs to manufacture its weapons of war. China could easily do this, at least for the interest of not providing the US with the materiell to enact its future planned blockade against China itself. But instead they seem more interested in short term profits of the products sold, which goes against the claimed long-term thinking mindset China glazers say.
>Drop bombs on AmerikkkaCan you motherfuckers not read???
I literally said:
>I'm not asking for war obviously >>2594836I forgot to mention. I have yet to see an instant, where doing nothing against US provocations has led to success.
Russia thought it could sit out and ignore Ukraine until it couldn't. China ignored Burma, and now multiple of its neighbouring governments involved in the Belt and Road Initiative have been CIA-undermined. Iran ignored Israeli aggression, which they would have been legally allowed to retaliate against proportionally through International Law. They didn't, and as a reward they got their nuclear programm damaged again by US bombs.
Not retaliating through force is understandable, but doing nothing, even diplomatically, is equally counterproductive.
>>2594810Why do you people keep saying the Gen-Z spring was cia backed color revolution’s sintesd of just big standard non majorly violent revolutions?
>>2594875Because they are backed, financed and organised by Western NGO's who are just secret service fronts, mostly the CIA.
Whenever imperial core regimes express support for the overthrow of some state (democratic or not) it's another huge indicator that things are fishy.
>non-violentThis is how I know you exclusively consume Westoid media. These colour revolutions are carried out by armed muscle, often openly carrying Western-made weapons, when they stormed government palaces. Especially in the recent Southeast Asian examples.
>>2594914NGOs don't necessarily work for national governments though. They are international glowie organizations in their own right, get financed by oligarchs and push the private agenda of these oligarchs.
*Bump
>>2594810>What is the rationale behind this?russias invasion of ukraine gave the usa a blank cheque to do whatever they please while the wars still ongoing as russia can't do much about it while they're still in the meatgrinder
>>2595659let's be real the US would do whatever they want anyway. It's not like Russia could stop the Iraq war