Previous:
>>2621617The "pwease stop the exodus of young men from Ukraine" t. Merz edition
Evidence of the influence and origin of neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine
https://archive.ph/44B9Qhttps://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323637https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323658https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323663https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323688https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323729https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323733https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323731https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323735https://archive.ph/x1sRT#1323740https://azovlobby.substack.com/https://banderalobby.substack.com/—————————————————–
ALWAYS APPROACH SOURCES CRITICALLY
Live maps and updates
DeepStateMap:
https://deepstatemap.liveEvents in Ukraine:
https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/SouthFront:
https://southfront.press/category/all-articles/world/europe/ukraine/Watch Together
📺 News/events:
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/HappeningsviaKlash📺 Hangout/chill:
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/bloodcastWatch By Yourself
>Video Essays / Historical Background📺 • Ukraine: The Avoidable War - Boy Boy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL4eNy4FCs8📺 • Ukraine's Nazi Problem - The Marxist Project
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yZvWAwU5W4📺 • America, Russia, and Ukraine's Far Right - Gravel Institute
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0pyVJG7_6Q📺 • The Nature of Putin's Russia and Its Causes (3-Part Series) - 1Dime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8d6Vzi7zYghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zODWTfMwFGwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Zuygh9Mzuo
<Current Happenings 📺 • The Grayzone:
https://www.youtube.com/@thegrayzone7996📺 • DDGeopolitics:
https://www.youtube.com/@DDGeopolitics📺 • Defense Politics Asia:
https://www.youtube.com/@DefensePoliticsAsia📺 • The Duran:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdeMVChrumySxV9N1w0Au-w📺 • The News Atlas:
https://www.youtube.com/c/thenewatlas📺 • Military Summary:
https://www.youtube.com/@militarysummary—————————————————–
Social media
>Twitterhttps://x.com/GeromanAThttps://x.com/plnewstodayhttps://x.com/RALee85https://x.com/MarQs__https://x.com/KofmanMichaelhttps://x.com/IntelCrab (
DEAD)
https://x.com/michaelh992https://x.com/Suriyakmapshttps://x.com/AMK_Mapping_ (
NEW)
<Telegramhttps://t.me/milinfolivehttps://t.me/hueviykharkovhttps://t.me/conflictzonehttps://t.me/vorpostehttps://t.me/intelslavahttps://t.me/grey_zonehttps://t.me/AussieCossackhttps://t.me/asbmilhttps://t.me/Slavyangrad🇷🇺🇺🇦
Thread guidelines:
• Please remember to add a spoiler to NSFW and extreme content such as graphic violence and gore.
• Try your best to not derail discussion too much from the main events and relevant places where the war is taken place, as well as other happenings, groups and public figures related to it.
• Meta discussion of the historical, philosophical and ideological background of the war is fine as long as its done in good faith and comradely.
• In the event the meta discussion overstays its welcome, participating users will be referred to take the conversation to the INTERNATIONALISM general thread.
• Quality shitposting and original content is encouraged! Spamming glowie memes is low effort.
• this is /ISG/ for people who treats geopolitics like shitty map games
• behead NATO, crush NATO, etc.
>>2639246>muh contextThe two of you have said that the SMO violates UN laws. It does not. NATO propaganda says it does because NATO propaganda is fact-averse and ignores pre-2022 reporting/findings.
>>2639251>muh contextwell a hatred of context says it all, doesn't it?
>The two of you have said that the SMO violates UN laws.I said they'd call it illegal regardless of convention and farc was making a point that claiming Russia is "hyper-legal" is dumb.
What is your native language?
Trump is turning into a NAFOtard
This general has become Bizarro World
I'm questioning everything I thought I knew about it :>
>>2639256I know, what exactly is anon's native language? I suspect we will never know, despite him bringing language in this. He's just that scared of being recognised despite his desire to be so.
>>2639253The claim is right there:
>>2635956>>Did you say that the SMO violates UNSC/UN laws?>pf, it did [violate UNSC/UN laws]You and your friend claimed the SMO violated UN laws. It did not. Sure, NATO says it did, but I don't care what NATO says - I care what the law says.
>>2639263The "hyper-legalist" Russia invaded Ukraine despite a lack of UN approval and NATO threats, now what is your native language?
>>2639265>more deflection, hyper schmyperThat tells me that your NAFO legal case is weak and that Russia's legal case is strong. The SMO did not violate UN laws. End of story.
>>2639265Russia formulated a legal case for the SMO and the basis was collective self defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter due to ongoing and escalating Ukrainian attacks on DPR/LPR in violation of UNSC Resolution 2202. Collective self defense does not require UN approval and NATO threats are irrelevant.
You can disagree with the argument, but they did formulate a legalist case.
>>2639268Russia wasn't afraid of anyone saying they broke the law when they invaded, what is your native language?
>>2639271Nevertheless, Russia wasn't afraid of anyone saying they broke the law when they invaded, what is your native language?
>>2639271Yes, but NAFO blockheads take NATO denials of reality as meaningful.
>>2639275What is your native language?
>>2639273>russia wasn't afraid of anyone saying they broke the law when they invaded, so they broke the lawlolwut
>>2639281>lolwutWhat native language is that from?
Mask-off moment. Guess the historian autist wasn't crashing out.
>>2639273being legalist doesn't mean you'll never do anything your enemies might call illegal. it means you go to great lengths to follow law as you understand and tick all the boxes. Then if someone claims you're breaking the law you have the argument and the receipts ready to defend yourself.
If the mods think I'm spamming and shitposting when it comes to demanding many, many anons they give up their native language where one made it a point ITT, ban me.
>>2639291Yeah, right, that's the problem, and not your NAFO clown assertion that the SMO was illegal under UN law. Russia did not violate UN law.
>>2639288>you'll never do anything your enemies might call illegal.Ah like noook lvov
>>2639294You did bring English grammar into it when we have multinational posters ITT, what is your native language?
>>2639288Also downgrading "hyper-leagalist" to merely "legalist" is pathetic, what is your native language?
>>2639288I'm amazed that all it took for the NAFO bots to out themselves was to call Russia's SMO legal. Since it enrages them so much: Russia did not violate UN law.
>>2639301What is your native language? Mine is English because I'm British, Ushanka is Russian, FARC is from a Spanish speaking language?
How is your Spanish and Russian?
>>2639303Russia did not violate UN law. See
>>2639263.
>>2639307FARC argued they're not hyper-legalist, what is your native language?
>>2639309Russia did not violate UN law. See
>>2639263 for the actual claim made.
>>2639315>The SMO did not violate international law.<The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine violated international law (including the Charter of the United Nations).The point being made in claiming that Russia is "hyper-legalist" is that they were too scared as cucktinists to oppose the west diplomatically, the point that was made was the invasion of Ukraine was against what the West/UN/US/NATO *themselves* considered legal and that's definitely the groups that cucktinists claim Russia are trying to appease.
You don't have a gotcha against farc, you've got a gotcha against yourself for being a grammar nazi. Now at long last, what is your native language?
>>2639366Russia did not violate UN law, contrary to the claim in
>>2635956:
>>Did you say that the SMO violates UNSC/UN laws?>pf, it did [violate UNSC/UN laws] >>2639379But the UN claims they broke the law, as do all of Russia's enemies regardless of all laws, convention and common sense. Russia aren't hyper-legalist. What is your native language?
>>2639388>But the UN claims they broke the lawThe question is not whether certain members of the UN claimed that Russia broke UN law but whether Russia actually did break UN law. Russia did not break UN law.
>>2639388UN was created by 4 (later 5) strongest nations in the world for the explicit purpose of preventing those nations from going to war with each other through the use of veto power that made those 5 countries impenetrable to UN actions. Legally speaking, UN cannot judge countries with veto powers.
>>2639400>>2639407The claim made was Russia are cucks because they're "hyper-legalists", as in they don't want to do the ball-on-the-table stuff the outlaws in the US do (that coincidentally is never discussed negatively ITT).
The contradiction is that Russia invaded Ukraine, regardless of whether the UN and the other powers that get to decide international law thought it was legal. Your gotcha against farc depends on the UN and other arbiters of international law disagree with him. They don't. So, you should probably be taking that to New York City where the HQ of the UN is, rather than using it to avoid telling us what your native language is.
>>2639426Please refer to the claim made in
>>2635956:
>>Did you say that the SMO violates UNSC/UN laws?>pf, it did [violate UNSC/UN laws]This claim was wrong. Russia did not violate UN law.
>>2639429I'm arguing against the claim that Russia is "hyper-legalist", what is your native language?
>>2639437If you accept that Russia did not violate UN law, then there is no disagreement.
>>2639443I don't think Russia is "hyper-legalist", what is your native language?
erm acktually it was america violating international law by not honoring their commitments in the budapest memorandum which bound them to put troops on the ground defending ukraine sooo
>>2639450Cool, what is your native language?
>>2639445I will assume you accept that Russia did not violate UN law.
>>2639454What can I assume your native language to be?
>>2639453Is there a reason you have to spam this and annoy everyone else reading the thread?
>>2639458Yes, because anon made a point about English grammar, so what is your native language?
Since there is no answer to that question, I'll assume it's a native English speaker talking down to FARC for being a native Spanish speaker
>>2639450>erm acktually it was america violating international law This.
>Shitposting argumentative twattery ends at 600
I know their game
>>2639549Stop spamming other people please.
>>2639559Not when they make it personal, I go rambo then
>>2639549you're still butthurt your falseflagging was discovered?
Unique IPs: 8