>>2647327>didn't throw a single wrench into imperialismYou are a dumbass who thinks of things only in terms of a static snapshot. Everything affects everything in one way or another.
>>2647324He did the full interview in English
>>2647327>the ship leaking from 999 holes instead of 998 holes doesn't matter>the ship leaking from 1000 holes instead of 999 holes doesn't matter(you are here)
>the ship leaking from 1001 holes instead of 1000 holes doesn't matter >>2647321What was its job exactly? I still don't see how arguing over Depp vs Heard or video games somehow pushed anyone to the Left. It just all seemed so infantile and low stakes like teenagers arguing over Model UN.
Like, was anyone actually converted to Marxism through the woke pipeline? Most of those people were just in it for the moral crusade part and Marxism is not a moral crusade. I've seen some examples of people abandoning woke and going full Marxist when they realized it was dumb, but I'm not sure how "useful" that was compared to just directly exposing them to Mao and Lenin and letting them come to their own conclusions.
>>2647332It’s not death by a thousand cuts until the actual death happens
>>2647330>would create an ice agethis is good actually lmao. Our warming globe could use little a nuclear winter, as a treat.
>>2647312Not a problem. As long as it's even a mild anniyance to Americans and Canadians. Waiting for THE THING to end imperialism for good just means sitting on one's ass and allowing Yanks to live happily
>>2647335>was anyone actually convertedYES!!! FOR THE LOVE OF FUCKING GOD YES!! I AM ONE OF THEM YOU DUMBASS FAGGOT!!
And I'm a fucking ML, full throated, stalin did nothing wrong type of guy.
Jesus christ. You have no concept of fluidity or organic schemas in that tiny fucking brain of yours I swear to god.
>>2647329Woke didn't do any kind of calculation or strategy it just declared completely idiotic new rules that infested twitter then HR and declared 70% of the population Satan.
You weren't part of a thinking and acting movement when you cheered on the SJWs. You were an useful idiot to the left wing of capital. (You still are, unless you come to terms with this.)
>>2647330That's a good deal.
>>2647334If the ship is still floating it doesn’t matter
>>2647337Yellowstone would expel permian extinction levels of carbon into the atmosphere, agriculture would be impossible for at least two generations
>>2647338This is literally just petty thinking, I’m not against it especially coming from a literal refugee but I question the efficacy
>>2647340You're a fucking dumbass with no ability to think dialectically. You're butthurt over the negative aspects of a culture
war without understanding that it was necessary and worked as "intended" however much you could assign something so superorganismic and emergent as capable of teleological "intention". Now we have communists AND we can say faggot and retard on the internet! Rejoice!
>>2647344The left wing of capital does not wage war against the right wing of capital. You keep gobbling up the fucking cultural charade, the meaningless spectacle, rooting for the "good guys", like the idiotic faux-radical consumer you are, gou subhuman burger.
>>2647343hold on how would a civil war cause yellowstone to erupt?
>>2647329On a whole you are correct but on an individual level I think many of us don't have enough choice in who we interact with to be selective of when to attempt deradicalization. You might feel that someone is too far-gone but their son or parent or spouse or coworker might still want to help them since they have to interact every day and it's in their direct interest. Rhetorical landmines like wokeness, DEI, etc just serve to shut down dialogue, which is why they're literally only relevant in American(and South Korean lol) politics and only exist to prevent deradicalization.
>>2647349Yellowstone would be unrelated to political events, unless a MOAB was dropped right there or something
>>2647348First of all, the left wing and right wing of capital are at odds with each other by their very nature, or else they wouldn't be called fucking different things in the first place, you fucking dipshit
And second, you refuse to understand how everything interrelates because you have a retards concept of culture, teleology, groups and the state itself.
>>2647347>FtM (female to MAGA)I'm stealing that
>>2647335I think it might be best to introduce people with a mix of both the classics and more "modern" introductory stuff like Jakarta Method that serve as historically closer examples of Liberalism's crimes
>>2647353The left wing and right wing of capital are doing wrestling kayfabe and you fell for it
>>2647353>The two sides of the same coin are at war at each other otherwise we wouldn't have different names for them: head vs. tailsLiteral sophistry.
>>2647351The point of "woke" was not to deradicalize the right, it was to radicalize the LEFT and it worked. It did its job, and it's over now. Yes it was fucking gay and stupid and full of dogshit, it was a weapon that any lib could get their hands on, but it was an obvious fertile ground for communist radicalization, I watched it with my own fucking two eyes, and it happened to me personally. You can deny it all you want, but that would just make you a non-dialectical, static thinker.
>>2647343I simply oppose doing nothing.
muuuuuuhh volllluntaaarissssm f off >>2647334the wise man notices that if it has 1000 holes leaking already, it will surely keep floating with 1000 more
>>2647359Woke, in reality, deradicalized the left.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>2647361If something and nothing have the same efficacy, doing something just mean you have energy to burn while nothing means you’re tired
>>2647357MA-MA-MA MAGA FACE MA-MA-MA-MA
>>2647365If even one Yank is mildly disturbed, it is nof 'nothing'.
>>2647363woke radicalized me and my 700 buddies
>>2647368Me and my 700 buddies now go by 701 different pronouns. Now THAT'S radical.
>>2647367Then your real friends and allies are fentanyl dealers, gambling apps on your phone, the junk food industry
you guys should seriously think now more than ever: people got machine-gunned while doing non-violent protest in the early 1900s and it didn't trigger a revolt for decades.
If a revolt is going to happen it's going to happen years after a Bradley IFV blasts into a crowd of unarmed people with a 25mm chaingun, and you're going to be calling people cucks for going back out and protesting non-violently again afterwards
>>2647372he's already said as much before
>>2647370>JusticeBourgeois meme for bourgeois minds.
>>2647358Literal leftcom arguments. Kill yourself
To be perfectly honest this whole thing is making me think that any kind of reform in the US is years away and even more "literally nothing" is ahead of us with incidences like this popping up occasionally. And it's because of the last 4 years. BLM was a joke. January 6th was a joke. And this is at large a joke too. ICE is beyond incompetent and they won't be able to pick up the pace. More and more states are passing bills to impede them, with NJ being one. And most importantly protests are incompetent and get nothing done. People talk shit online and the alphabet agencies have plenty of money and resources but good luck getting people do actually apply any of it in an effective way. And the Epstein files are never getting released and nobody is ever going to do anything about it. Trump's pathetic attempts to ignite WWIII will also fail because no one can afford that shit.
Dems will get voted in after this and then we're in for the rise in libshit propaganda once again where nothing changes for several years.
However I don't think the right is ever going to find someone to replace Trump after this. Even when Trump endorses people it most times doesn't work because they just don't have the pull he does. Something about him makes the chuds flock to him but it doesn't seem to work for anyone else.
It's just a slow crawl to the eventual economic ruin ahead. After that who knows.
>#JusticeFor[insert name/cause]
i sleep
>#ClassTerror
i wake
>>2647379It’s not really “eventual”, if Open AI cannot go public and turn a profit (it hasn’t so far) a crash worse than 1929 is happening
THIS YEAR >>2647372Absolutely! They are revolutionary!
>>2647384I did cocaine at work today now my head hurts and my nose is stuffy, therefore AUC Gulf Clan are true revolutionaries
>>2647383OpenAI will get bought by the government and be 100% absorbed into the Pentagon's black budget so they can hail it as a "win" for AI and a "win" for America while not showing how unprofitable AI is.
>>2647385This lumpen-junkie behaviour is unbecoming of a /leftypol/ comrade. But then again you are a Yank. I am torn.
>>2647382Very good praxis.
>If you like communism so much why don't you move to communist China then?I'd love to but I am compelled as a communist to strive to bring the same high standards of living communist China has over here.
>>2647386Then what happens to the trillion dollar IOUs getting passed back and forth between Nvidia, Meta, Alphabet, and Microsoft? Or do they also get swallowed and partially nationalized like US Steel and Intel?
>>2647385>Boss makes a dollar I make a dime which is why I do hard drugs on company timebased
Unique IPs: 14