MARXIST-LENINIST GENERAL
Founder's Edition
Esteemed comrades, revolutionary greetings.
This is a thread for Marxist-Leninist to talk among Marxist-Leninists. By that, we mean actual, real, complete Marxist-Leninists, not those who appropriate the heritage of Marxism-Leninism, but then proceed to denounce Lenin and Stalin from anarchist, left-deviationist and right-deviationist positions. Be not afraid to mercilessly bully the trotskyist, the leftcommunist, the anarchist, the social democrat and all the other saboteurs and lackeys of imperialism.
z⣿⣻⣟⣯⣟⣿⢿⡻⣟⣿⣽⣻⣟⡿⣻⣽⣻⢟⣻⡟⣿⡻⣟⡿⣽⣻⢿⣽⡻⣟⣿⣻⢟⣿⣻⢿⣽⣻⣽⣻⠿⣽⣻⣟⣿⣻⣟⣿⣻⡽⣯⢿⡽⣯⠿⣽⣻⣽⣻⢯⣟⣿⣻⣟⣿⣻⢯⣟⡿⣽⣻⢟⣿⡻⣟⣿⣻⣟⣿⣻⣟⣿⣻⣟⣯⣟⣯⢿⡽⣯⠿⣽⢯⠿⣽⢯⡿⣽⣻⣽⣻⣽⣻⣽⣻⡽⣯⢿⡽⣯⠿⣽⢯⠿⣽⢯⠿⣽⣫⣟
⣞⡷⢯⣟⣿⣻⣿⣿⡿⣶⢯⣗⣯⣽⣳⢯⣟⣯⢷⣻⢷⣻⣽⣻⢷⣯⣟⡾⣽⣻⢶⣯⣟⣾⣳⣟⣮⢷⣳⢯⣟⡷⣻⡼⣞⣷⢻⣞⣷⣻⡽⣯⢷⣯⣟⡷⣯⢶⣯⣟⣾⣳⡽⣞⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣻⢶⣻⣞⣳⣟⣾⣳⣟⣾⣳⣟⡾⣯⣟⣷⣻⡽⣞⡿⣽⠾⣝⡷⢯⣶⢻⣶⣛⡶⣯⠷⣏⡿⣞⣽⣻⢽⡞⣿⣹⡞⣟⣧⠿⣼
⡾⣽⣛⡾⣽⣏⡿⣿⡽⣿⡿⣾⣷⣳⣯⣟⡾⣭⡿⣽⢯⡷⣯⢯⡷⣯⢾⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣞⣳⢾⡽⣫⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⢿⣹⣞⡿⣞⣳⢯⡷⣯⣟⡶⣯⢿⣽⣻⣞⣾⣳⣽⣻⡽⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣟⣧⣟⣷⡻⣶⣻⡞⣷⣻⢾⣽⣳⢯⣞⣷⣻⡽⣽⣫⢿⣽⡻⣟⣾⣛⡶⣯⢟⣞⡿⣹⢷⣛⣮⠷⣏⣟⣳⣭⢿⣹⣞⣻⣳
⣽⡳⢯⣳⢟⣮⢷⣻⢯⡓⠿⣽⣻⣟⡷⣿⡽⣯⢿⡽⣯⢿⡽⣯⢿⣽⣻⢾⣽⣻⢾⣽⣳⢯⣟⣯⣾⣽⣻⢾⣽⣳⢯⣞⡷⣯⡽⣯⣟⣯⢿⡵⣾⡽⣯⢷⣻⣞⡽⣞⣷⣛⡾⣽⣻⢾⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣟⢾⣣⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣽⣳⢯⣟⡶⣯⣟⣾⣵⣯⣽⣷⣽⣿⣶⣿⣽⣮⣿⣽⣳⣟⢾⣹⢟⡾⣝⡾⣻⢽⣺⣳⢯⢯⡷⣞⣳⡽
⢾⡽⣯⡽⢾⣹⠾⠙⠛⣿⣦⠈⠳⣯⣟⣷⣻⡽⣯⢿⣽⣻⢿⣽⣻⣞⣯⢿⡾⣽⢯⡷⣟⣯⢿⣞⡷⣯⣟⡿⣾⣽⣻⢾⣽⢷⣻⢷⣻⣞⣯⣟⣷⣻⣽⣯⣷⣯⢿⡽⣞⡽⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾⣽⣛⡾⠽⠷⠯⠟⠾⠯⢷⣯⣽⣷⣯⣟⡾⣽⣿⣾⣿⣿⡿⢿⡿⣿⢿⣿⣿⡿⠛⢋⣉⣹⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⡽⡽⣞⣽⡳⣏⡷⢯⣛⡾⣝⣧⣟
⣻⣼⣳⣿⠋⠁⠈⠀⢾⣯⢟⣷⠀⠸⣿⣼⣳⢿⣽⣻⢾⣽⣻⣞⣷⣻⣞⣯⠿⣽⠯⠿⢛⠛⠛⠚⠛⠳⠯⠿⣳⢯⣟⠿⣞⣿⣽⣿⣵⣶⣶⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⠈⠉⠙⠛⠻⠷⢯⡿⠞⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠠⠉⠞⣿⣶⣷⣾⣻⡿⢹⡿⢫⠟⢰⢈⣿⣎⣵⡞⣼⣏⣠⣴⢾⣿⣿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣶⡻⣭⣟⢯⣯⡽⢯⡶⢯
⣯⢯⣻⢿⣆⢀⣤⣀⠈⠻⣾⡽⡆⠀⣿⣽⣻⢾⣽⣻⢾⡽⣯⢿⣽⠯⣛⣯⡴⠋⠀⢀⠜⡤⢀⠤⠒⠀⠐⠀⠙⠺⢽⣶⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣟⣯⠉⠙⡓⠲⠤⠄⠀⢀⡠⠚⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⠹⢿⣿⣿⣿⠁⡾⢁⡎⠀⢸⣬⣿⣿⣽⡡⣿⣿⡟⠙⠌⠋⢉⢠⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣳⢯⡽⣾⣭⢷⣞⣳⣞
⣿⢯⡷⣯⢿⡿⣿⣯⣷⣄⠈⠛⠇⠀⣿⢾⣽⣻⢾⡽⣯⢿⣽⠟⢫⠴⠋⠀⣀⠀⣠⢊⣉⣴⣦⠔⠁⡠⠚⡠⠄⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⠾⠿⠿⣷⣶⣧⣤⡴⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠺⣿⣿⠋⠐⢸⣿⡁⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⡯⠓⢌⡀⢤⣀⡌⠭⣩⢟⡽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣟⡶⣯⣟⢾⣳⡽
⣿⣻⢿⠋⠉⢠⣤⡈⠓⠛⠓⠀⠀⠐⢿⣯⡾⣽⢯⡿⣽⠏⠃⣠⣤⠶⠛⠘⠛⠐⠈⠙⠉⠉⠉⠙⠲⠷⠊⠁⠀⠀⡤⠚⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣤⢙⣯⢻⣿⠟⠛⠋⠉⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⢻⣤⣀⠀⣂⣡⡾⣽⣳⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣳⣞⣯⢷⣻
⣿⡽⣿⣧⣶⢿⣽⣻⢶⣶⣶⢿⣳⣄⠀⣹⡽⣯⣟⣿⣉⣴⣾⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠎⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢻⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣷⠟⣽⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢯⣞⡾⡽⣞
⣿⣽⣳⣟⣿⡽⣶⢯⣟⡾⣽⣻⣷⣟⡿⣯⢟⣷⠟⠉⠉⡝⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡌⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡟⠿⣿⣻⣽⢬⣓⣮⣝⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢮⢷⣻⢽
⡷⣯⡷⣟⣾⢿⣽⣛⡾⣽⣳⢟⡾⣽⣻⣭⡿⠃⢀⣰⣼⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣷⡀⣤⣌⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢯⣛⡾⣽
⣟⣷⣻⢯⣟⣯⣿⣿⣽⣳⢯⣿⣹⣗⡿⠊⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡧⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣠⣤⣤⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢯⣏⡷⢯
⣿⢾⡽⣯⣟⣾⣳⢿⣻⣽⣻⢮⡷⣾⠀⠀⠀⢙⠶⠛⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣤⣤⣀⠀⠀⢠⣠⣤⣤⣶⣶⣶⣦⣤⣀⠀⠀⠹⣷⣤⣄⡀⠀⢠⣀⣠⣶⣿⡿⠟⠛⠉⠙⠛⢦⣄⣀⠴⠾⡟⠻⢶⡆⠀⠰⠶⣿⣿⠛⢛⣉⠛⠿⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠺⣷⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⢞⡽⣯
⣿⢯⣟⡾⣵⢯⣿⣻⣽⣟⣯⡿⣽⡏⢩⢒⡴⠋⠀⢰⣿⣶⣤⡀⡀⢀⢀⣠⣤⣶⣾⡿⠗⠲⢤⣀⠀⠀⠸⡿⢋⣻⣿⡗⠂⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣭⣁⡀⠀⠉⠳⣄⠀⢙⢄⣹⣿⠆⠀⠈⣹⣿⣿⣶⣶⣤⣬⣁⣺⣿⣓⢯⣉⠴⢷⣶⣾⠇⠔⠁⠀⢀⣿⣶⣶⡿⢿⣶⣌⣙⡷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢺⡹⣿⣿⡟⠛⢻⠟⣉⣤⣙⣿⣿⣿⣟⣧⢿⡽⣞
⣿⣻⢾⣽⣻⣞⣳⢿⣿⡾⣽⣻⢷⢣⡞⢉⠟⣤⠤⠿⣿⣍⣭⣿⣿⠚⠛⠻⢿⣿⣷⣦⣤⣤⣀⣩⣳⣄⠀⠱⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢀⡾⠛⢿⣿⣟⠿⠙⠳⣦⣶⢽⡁⠈⠿⢿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⡀⢿⡯⠭⠀⠈⢉⠿⠋⠉⠁⣀⣈⡿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢙⠿⣿⣐⡀⠀⠠⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⣴⠛⡇⠘⣯⣿⣿⣻⣞⣯⡽⣞
⣿⣽⣻⣞⡷⣯⣻⠾⣽⢿⣿⡽⣿⣶⠉⣤⠂⠀⠀⠀⢘⣿⣛⣓⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢻⣭⣍⡈⠉⠙⠯⠝⠀⢠⠟⢩⡟⠀⢀⠞⠀⠀⠘⣯⣁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠀⢀⡇⡘⠀⠀⠐⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠁⠁⠈⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⡾⣉⢼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡔⠁⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⡀⠀⢰⣿⣷⣿⡄⣿⣿⣟⣷⣻⢾⡽⣯
⣿⣞⡷⣯⣟⡷⣯⢿⡽⡾⣽⣻⣿⣿⣼⣿⡇⣀⠤⣶⣇⡘⢋⡹⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⢌⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣏⠀⡰⠁⠀⠀⡄⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⢻⡵⠁⠀⢲⣀⠤⠄⢦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣼⢣⣴⠃⢠⠂⠀⣤⣶⠍⠑⢦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠇⢀⣼⢢⢉⣿⠇⣷⣿⣿⢾⡽⣯⣟⣷
⢿⡽⣷⣻⣽⢷⣻⠾⣵⣳⢯⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡉⢀⣽⡍⠁⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⡠⠄⢦⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⢹⡄⢇⠀⠀⠀⡑⠉⠉⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⢨⣇⡀⠀⢸⣟⣀⠀⢨⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣿⡟⣎⢿⡀⣾⢀⣐⣉⣉⣀⣰⠈⢧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠄⢾⣯⠬⠸⢋⣶⣿⣿⣟⣾⣳⢯⡿⣽
⢯⣟⡷⣿⡽⣯⣟⣿⣳⢯⣟⣞⣳⢿⣿⣷⢻⣷⡟⣿⡄⢠⠖⢦⣄⣤⣾⣤⣤⠄⠓⢌⠀⠀⠀⠊⠀⠀⠀⣎⣇⣨⣿⣿⣾⣿⣟⠒⠉⠻⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠤⠳⡈⢛⣿⣿⣿⣯⡋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠘⣿⣿⣜⠦⡟⢛⣿⣿⣿⣇⣀⣀⠀⢀⠙⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡖⠐⣶⡀⣹⣾⣿⣟⣾⣳⣟⣯⢿⣽
⣻⠾⣽⣳⡿⣽⣾⣳⣯⣟⡾⣝⣯⣟⡾⣿⠋⠉⠀⣟⣥⣴⣾⣿⣻⣿⣿⣟⣹⡋⠀⠀⢳⣄⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣾⢟⡭⢉⢡⡿⠟⠉⠙⢆⢠⡀⢁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⠀⣸⠋⢼⣿⡯⠺⣽⡷⢶⣶⣶⣆⠀⠀⠀⣽⠁⣹⡧⣿⡏⢹⣿⠙⢻⣿⣿⣇⡲⣿⡌⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡐⠠⠈⣼⣷⣄⣸⠷⢫⣿⣟⣾⣳⣟⡾⣽⣻⢾
⣽⣛⡷⣯⣟⡷⣯⡷⣿⣻⡾⣽⣺⣳⢿⢟⡀⣒⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡣⢘⡄⣿⠳⣄⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣥⢇⣼⢈⣄⠀⠀⠀⢡⣷⠘⡄⠀⠀⢀⡀⠈⠀⠐⣿⣿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠒⠺⠯⠿⢿⣿⠀⠀⢘⡇⠀⣾⠳⣿⢀⣾⣿⣷⣾⣷⣿⣹⣷⣹⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡐⢠⠣⡑⢮⣹⡏⠁⢀⠲⣿⣞⣧⣟⡾⣽⣳⢯⣟
⣾⣭⢷⣛⡾⣽⣷⣟⡷⣟⣿⣳⢷⣻⡏⠼⠟⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡶⣶⣟⡿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣷⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣾⣎⣧⠀⠀⠀⢻⡈⠀⢰⡆⠀⠶⠁⠤⠂⠈⠹⡆⣶⣶⣶⠖⠁⠀⠀⠀⢧⣠⠞⠉⠃⣸⠟⡡⢛⢿⣿⢠⡴⣤⠬⣉⡙⠛⠛⢿⡟⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠘⢢⠱⡉⢦⠟⠀⠈⠄⢛⣿⣞⡷⣾⣽⣳⢯⣟⡾
⣷⣻⠾⣽⡽⣳⢯⣿⣽⣯⢷⣟⣯⢿⠁⢀⡤⣽⣿⣿⡿⠭⠉⠙⠙⣻⡶⠯⠿⠿⢿⡿⢿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⡀⡀⠀⠀⣠⣿⣷⢶⠄⢀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠟⢩⡿⠟⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠀⠀⢀⢡⠚⡤⢃⠌⠙⡆⠛⠛⠋⠑⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠐⢠⠉⠦⢡⠝⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣯⣟⡷⣾⣽⣻⢾⡽
⣯⢷⣻⢷⣻⡽⢯⣞⡿⣞⡿⣾⣭⢿⠏⢹⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠪⣄⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⢿⣀⠀⠙⠏⠷⣾⠴⠯⡀⠀⢠⣿⣴⣿⣷⣾⡢⠀⠀⣠⡴⢊⣠⠴⡸⢌⠣⡙⡐⣹⢂⢩⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠢⠘⡄⢉⠂⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣻⣿⣽⣳⢯⣟⣯⢿
⡿⣯⣟⣯⢷⣻⣛⡾⣽⢯⣟⡷⣯⠏⠀⡔⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣵⣿⣿⣿⣿⠷⠾⠛⠻⡿⠟⠃⢸⣿⣿⡌⠙⠃⠀⠀⠀⠁⢀⠈⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣾⣿⣿⢯⢣⠋⠴⡉⢂⠅⡐⠃⢸⠆⣣⡀⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣀⠦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠂⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣟⣷⣿⣻⢿⣿⣿⣾⣭⣟
⣿⣳⣟⡾⣯⢷⢯⣟⡾⣛⣾⡽⠃⠀⢼⡓⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠎⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠄⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣡⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢿⣿⣿⣆⣀⠘⠀⢠⠀⠈⠀⠰⠁⡈⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢏⡇⠣⠘⠄⡁⢂⠐⠀⠀⠈⡶⠖⠉⢉⣷⣶⣿⣟⢯⣛⠌⡒⢈⠙⠣⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣿⡿⣯⣿⣞⣷⡿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣿⣻
⣟⡷⣯⢿⡽⣯⣟⡾⣽⣻⣾⡇⠀⠀⢀⡍⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⢻⣿⣿⡿⣿⠋⠀⠀⠀⢀⠜⠁⠀⠈⠫⢛⠛⠻⣷⡏⠓⠀⡀⡔⠀⢈⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⠛⠋⠉⠉⠙⠲⢬⣁⡌⠐⣀⣢⠴⠚⠁⠂⠀⢠⣴⣿⣿⡿⣾⣹⢷⣮⣧⡈⠄⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⡿⣽⣟⣾⣽⢾⣿⢯⣿⣿⣿⣽⣻
⣿⡽⣯⢿⣽⣳⣾⣽⣷⣿⣿⣇⢹⣤⣞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣟⡳⢌⣲⡴⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠃⠠⠀⠁⡈⠐⣠⣶⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣬⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣀⣴⣾⣿⣿⡿⣯⣿⢷⣯⣟⣞⡷⢿⣛⠦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⢷⣻⣟⣾⣽⢾⣻⣽⣿⣿⣿⣟⣾⢿
⣯⣿⣽⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⠃⠈⠑⠂⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⠏⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠖⢠⣅⣶⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣟⣿⣻⣾⡽⣾⣽⢫⣟⡷⣌⡀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⢿⣽⣻⣽⣾⣻⢾⣻⣽⣳⣿⣿⡿⣯⣟⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⡀⢀⠀⠄⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣿⡏⡄⢠⠐⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣯⣷⢿⣻⣿⣿⣟⡿⣽⣟⣯⣷⢯⣟⡾⣽⣳⡻⣷⢦⣀⣠⣾⣿⢿⣻⣾⣽⣻⡽⣯⢿⣞⣯⣟⣿⣿⣿⡷⣿⣻⣽
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇⢾⣷⠀⠀⠠⢀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⢋⢿⣿⣿⣿⣹⣳⣯⢗⣾⣧⣓⣠⣤⣴⣠⣀⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⢿⣯⣟⣿⢾⣽⢿⣻⣿⣿⣾⣽⣻⢾⣟⣾⣻⢾⣽⣳⢷⣻⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣻⣟⡾⣷⢯⣿⡽⣯⣟⣾⣽⣿⣿⣿⣽⢿⣽⣻
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣏⠷⢮⡐⢦⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣩⢾⣿⣿⣳⣯⣷⢿⣻⢾⣯⡽⣯⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣴⣾⡿⣟⣯⣿⣞⣿⢾⣟⣯⣿⣻⢿⣿⣷⣯⣟⡿⣾⡽⣯⣟⡾⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣻⣽⢿⣞⡿⣽⡾⣽⣾⣿⣿⢷⣻⣯⢿⣽
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣟⢡⢻⣼⣻⡽⢤⠄⡀⠀⠀⠠⢊⢳⣻⣿⣿⣿⣽⡿⣯⣟⡿⣾⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣟⣷⢿⣻⣽⣾⣻⡾⣟⣯⡿⣞⣿⣻⣿⣿⣷⣯⣟⣷⣟⡷⣯⣟⣿⣿⣿⣻⣾⢿⣯⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣟⡾⣿⣽⣻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣯⠟⢯⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣼⣤⣤⢶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣷⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣯⢿⣻⣽⣟⣯⣷⣟⣷⢿⣻⣽⣻⢯⣷⡿⣽⣿⣿⣾⡽⣾⣽⣻⢷⣿⣿⣻⡷⣿⡽⣟⣯⣿⣟⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣳⣯⣟⣿⣿⡿⣷⡿⣽⡆⠀⢹
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣾⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣽⣿⣯⣿⣯⣷⣿⣽⣾⣻⣾⣿⣽⣾⣯⣿⣳⣿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣾⣿⣿⣿⣯⣿⣽⣷⣿⣟⣯⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣽⣿⣿⣻⣏⣛⣉⣓⢊⣸
81 posts and 12 image replies omitted. >>2701773Just because they weren't dengists doesn't mean they weren't revisionists lol
>>2701768Greenlighting democratic socialism
you could argue Stalin telling communists in europe to do popular fronts against fascism is similar, but its not an ahistorical revision of core principles of scientific socialism in general
besides that, I think Khrushchev at least was mostly fine really
>>2701854In what sense were they revisionists? If they didn't restore capitalism and they didn't reconcile with imperialism then the accusation is meaningless. If the definition of revisionism is working against the socialist revolution and undoing socialist construction (while pretending to be supporting it), then I'd argue you have to do at least one of those two things to qualify.
>>2701864>If the definition of revisionism is working against the socialist revolution and undoing socialist construction (while pretending to be supporting it)I think greenlighting democratic socialism in a generalized way does that
I'm guessing you probably think Hoxha was a retard, and I don't agree with him on everything, but I think he was 100% right here:
https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/albania/chile.html >>2701877>I think greenlighting democratic socialism in a generalized way does thatI might agree if he had renounced revolutionary activity altogether, but we can see from the USSR's robust internationalism at the time that this wasn't the case. In practice it was also just the formalization of a policy that Stalin had already been pursuing with the popular front and dissolution of the comintern.
>>2701881>the formalization of a policy that Stalin had already been pursuingthats what makes it revisionism instead of just a mistake in tactics or policy or whatever, I agree the difference is subtle, but that doesnt mean its just an irrelevant detail
After this "formalization" many communists parties dropped leninism forever and became communists in name only, and now the USSR doesnt exist anymore so they can't correct this mistake or compensate via supporting actual revolutionary socialists
>>2701909I think it's an irrelevant distinction since in countries where parties actually followed this advice revolutionary conditions were lacking anyways.
>>2701791Learn how to read.
The poster does not say 2+2=5, it says 2+2+the increased enthusiasm of the workers = 5.
Meaning that the 5-year plan will be completed in 4 years due to the increased enthusiasm of the workers.
The anglofaggot Orwell could not be bothered to get a russian to translate the text and he just soygaped over it like the dickless anticommunist animal that he was.
>>2701991>The anglofaggot Orwell could not be bothered to get a russian to translate the text and he just soygaped over it like the dickless anticommunist animal that he was.Honestly even if you don't read Russian his interpretation of it was still retarded. Just seeing the poster without reading Russian the obvious intent is to show that socialist plans are so successful and effective that its analogous to making two plus two equal five. It's very similar to the idiom of "giving 110%". The intended meaning is clear as long as you don't have turbo autism.
>>2701976>this advicegreenlighting democratic socialism in a generalized way (and not even retracting this position after it worked out horribly) is not "advice", is revisionism, sorry
>>2702054Ehhh technically but in practice I don't think it mattered much. So I'll concede that he was a revisionist but I still maintain that opposing the post-Stalin USSR was just crypto-Trotskyism.
>>2702126>but in practice I don't think it mattered muchit had very serious consequences, i guess you just skipped the text i linked lol
>>2703041
Partial quote grossly alters meaning in context
>>2702500I'm not very inclined to agree with the analysis of somebody who thought Cuban soldiers fighting apartheid were "agents of imperialism." Hoxha was a crypto-Trot.
>>2702500>>2703049Also I think it's ridiculous to blame the Soviets for what happened in Chile. Allende was a reformist, his party was a reformist party. The Soviets didn't compel him to do anything, and he ignored the advice of Castro (who Hoxha considered an imperialist) to carry out a genuine revolution. If the Soviets had told him to do the same he likely would have ignored them as well. The irony of course is that if the Soviets had gotten more heavily involved and helped establish a revolutionary government in Chile, Hoxha no doubt would have cited it as an example of "Soviet imperialism".
>>2702468aww, they love each other
>>2702468Hinkle feels lost. He is unsure about this whole communist thing. He feels like everything is run by Haz and he is just awkwardly there. He will leave soon. It's all true, he told me.
>>2703815the way its going its more profitable to be a rightoid
>>2703815good riddance honestly, i kind of want to support acp guys because they do some good work, but the presence of hinkler makes it difficult as this guy seems to have some sort of longterm ties to the russian government which is concerning to say the least
>>2703832Ties to the Russian government is good actually, specially if you are an American.
That is not the issue with Hinkle. The issus with him is that he is empty. He says and does nothing of value for a 'communist movement'.
>>2703920If russkis can manipulate him somehow it would potentially compromise the whole party. Worse yet if russian interests change from destabilizing the US.
>>2703902That too but he was never there for that purpose in the first place
>>2703929>And this will happen when?I think it already has. At least if you follow the propaganda narrative from RT, it has taken a much softer line towards the U.S. while taking a harder line towards Europe. So there's something about the U.S. government's general approach that the Russian government sees as at least compatible with their own vision of the how the world should work. Also here's Russia's special envoy for economic investment and the CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund.
>>2703815>Hinkle feels lost. He is unsure about this whole communist thing. It's a LARP.
>>2703937The ruskis have always talked shit about the Europeans which are just american dogs anyway. Even if Russia were to take a more amicable stance towards the Americans as a strategy, it's not up to them
>>2703929
>even if the entire party was directly subordinate to Putin himself that would hardly be concerning
It would harm them the same way being beholden to the Soviet government was harmful to the CPUSA. They would always flip flop on issues in ways that perfectly matched Soviet foreign policy, and it made them look like agents of a foreign power rather than allies and defenders of the American worker. For example over the course of FDR's presidency, they went from opposing him during the the Third Period, to supporting him under the Popular Front, to opposing him during Molotov-Ribbentrop, to supporting him during Operation Barbarossa.
>>2704132
Undignified yanks must get the fuck out of Chagos. Death to Amerikkkans
>>2704156they call em yanks because they yanked the chagos islands
>>2704145send drone pics of the base to irgc to maximize your chances
>>2704155
Yes. I know all of this. Mauritius knows we will never be able to get rid of the yank base. We simply limited our demands to sovereignty, american-exit was never explicitly voiced out. And still, the yank animals……….
The only force in the world capable of defeating american imperialism and NATO is the 'leftists' of amerikkka.
But alas, the yank 'leftists' are all too happy with imperialism
>>2701770It's the contrapositive to Engels: these gentlemen think that by changing things without changing the name, the things stay the same.
>>2705430It's a sad state of affairs to be sure
>>2704155
He hasn't personally attacked the base to kill the Anglo soldiers there. Based on the immortal dialectical science of Marxism-Chagosism we have to conclude that this makes him a willing and gleeful collaborator.
>>2705598It's Felixism-Chagosism saboanon and you clearly don't get that the onus is on Americans to go and kill anglo soldiers and destroy american imperialism, not randos in the third world. He is clean as a whistle and not a collaborator
>>2705602Wrong. The third world is oppressed. The third world will leave the revolution. Euroamerikkkans are collaborators. You are imperialist.
>>2705606That's """Thirdworldism""" Saboanon (presuming you meant to say lead the revolution), not Felixism-Chagosism
>>2705615Wrong etc. You are imperialist kkkrakkka etc.
>>2705602You are intelligent. You have grasped the crux of anti-imperialism.
>>2705598You have to clean your own mess. You will not sit and reap the rewards of others. You have to die fighting imperialism. I will inherit your ruins and live a happy life.
>>2705627Wrong. You are imperialist.
>>2705627It's because Im not american and I see the people in the rest of the world as human beings like me
>>2703815Wrong. They are gay lovers. They will soon announce their relationship.
>>2705658Haz always came off as an insecure bottom to me
>>2705666He's definitely short enough.
>>2705630lol its funny when you start TWistposting please keep doing it :)
>>2704132
>The world was a completely different place back then, those were interimperialist conflicts between powers of relatively little difference in influence, at least compared to today.
I don't buy it. Italy in World War I? They entered an inter-imperialist war despite being much less powerful, was that something you would've supported if you were Italian? ᴉuᴉlossnW's transformation into a fascist was a result of that process.
Unique IPs: 27