Imagine my shock when I learned that US demographic losses from Great Depression were almost as high as what USSR had suffered from WW2 or WW1. It was like 10 times worse than Soviets' Holodomor, as it turns out. Simply terrifying what kind of horrors US censorship has hidden from us
Too bad Cucktin will never mass-publicize this research because it makes the Soviets look good and he wants to keep the
>muh famines
talking point to beat up Communists with.
>>2706641The history of Leftism in America has been totally buried and it's sort of shocking to learn about.
Before WW2, before FDR's policies, the proletariat in America were literally ready to have their own full-fledged uprising against the Robber-Barons.
In a way pretty much all the economic benefits and the New Deal itself was created because Washington was presented with a choice:
>"Give us our just due and rights as Workers or we're gonna fucking kill you all." >>2747618I mean I kind of fucking hate FDR for that TBH.
>>2706689
>russianPost a source that we can actually read. I doubt the losses from the great depression were really that bad.
>>2747684What if you were black? Or any type of minority at the time.
And proverty sure as hell existed then, its just that was the best time for the upper middle class at the time
>>2747684Not if you were a worker
>>2747618Some think the Black Panthers were the first leftist of the US, insteaf of just another chapter of 60s activism.
>>2750210Marx's theory around mental production should be core to this understanding. We get a censored history of America that shows prosperous white families in large suburban homes, which was a small minority of people.
A false consciousness of American prosperity has been implanted in people.
Everyone else was living in slum conditions, had no healthcare or right to vote and the police and public reveled in hyperviolence against itself.
>>2750210>What if you were black? Or any type of minority at the time<What if you were in the global south or any type of imperialized subject It doesn't matter to treatlerites as long as the majority benefitted which was the majority of white people during the 1950s and allowed for the demonization of communism in the first place
>>2706641>>2706689>US demographic losses from Great Depression were almost as high as what USSR had suffered from WW2 or WW1>It was like 10 times worse than Soviets' HolodomorUh-huh, yeah, good, OK
And how does that follow from the source you've posted?
It only says this
>По США имеется только один «провал» для возрастов от 15 до 34 лет, в котором «дно» приходится на возраста 20— 29 лет.<As for the United States, there is only one "hole" [in the graph] - adults of the age from 15 to 34 years and the "bottom" of the hole is the age of 20-29 years
>Лица 15— 34 лет родились в 1925—44 гг., в том числе лица 20— 29 лет — в 1930—39 гг. Н а уменьшении численности родившихся в США в эти годы сказался общий кризис капиталистической системы и происходившие в условиях его экономические кризисы (особенно значительные в 1919—21 гг., 1929— 33 гг. и в 1937— 38 гг.).Кризисы 1929— 33 гг. и 1937— 38 гг. сказались на возрастной структуре населения США так же значительно,как на возрастной структуре Советского Союза — первая и вторая мировые войны.<The persons aged 15–34 were born in 1925–44, persons aged 20–29 in 1930–39. The decrease in the number of people born in the USA during these years was caused by the general crisis of the capitalist system and the economic crises that occurred under its conditions (especially significant were the crises of 1919–21, 1929–33, and 1937–38). The crises of 1929–33 and 1937–38 affected the age structure of the US population as much as the First and Second World Wars affected the age structure of the Soviet Union. It doesn't say anything about the casualties of the crisis, it just says the birth rates were lower. Learn to read.
>>2752612leftypol cant read
>>2752612Perhaps OP meant less people being born as demographic losses because that's basically the same logic western historians would apply to the soviets
>>2747679ask deepseek to translate it. you can give deepseek PDFs
>>2752729>Perhaps OP meant less people being born as demographic lossesI would also think so, if he didn't say
<Simply terrifying what kind of horrors US censorship has hidden from us
>that's basically the same logic western historians would apply to the sovietstrue
I kind of want to vindicate the OP, but upon reading the source, it's pretty much the same thing that bourgeois propagandists do when they use projected birthrates to prove that communism killed 100 trillion, but from the other side. Understandable for the Soviets to use this line back in the day, but hardly solid evidence by today's standards.
>>2756101
Never expected a "blacks had it better before Civil Rights" take here but I guess that's par for the course in /leftypol/.
You're memeing right? You genuinely don't believe Blacks had it better in the 60s or 70s than today?
>>2756101
Certain parts of the south. I think it's mainly the cities of the south in particular places like Atlanta and Dallas or Houston.
Unique IPs: 21