>>2747173no.
the fact that neither you, nor anyone you know, has suffered any consequence is proof enough that it was harmless to you.
but in more detail: only two of the vaccines ever had a proven link to an increased risk of heart attacks or strokes (via blood clots) in 2 out of every 100,000 people in the worst case, and 1 out of 500,000 people in the best case. odds are, that's not you. but your odds get better still: because this risk only appeared for younger people, most countries didn't give those vaccines to under 60s. so you probably didn't get that one. (if you got pfizer, for example, you're clear) moreover, if you did get one of those vaccines, and if you are one of those improbably unlucky people, then the odds are still that you would have survived. any adverse reaction would have happened a few weeks after you got the shot, not years later.
tl;dr you're talking about a vanishingly small risk that would, if it was going to get you, have got you by now, and which - even if it applied to you - probably wouldn't have killed you, just hospitalized you. you can chill.