>>2749717Corbyn wanted a top down system similar to Labour and to bring in Muslim independent MPs who shared agreements on Gaza and foreign policy, but were economically right wing and socially very reactionary. Several of them were straight up landlords and going to the papers to bash trans people.
Also, Corbyn will not do anything until pushed by others. He needed Sultana to get progress started.
Sultana wanted a bottom up collective leadership strategy, which is utopian and arugably unworkable. She was also fine with Trotskyist infiltrators holding dual party memberships with YP and their own factional outfits.
She was undoubtedly further to the left than Corbyn economically and socially, both pro-Gaza and extremely socially progressive and unrepentantly pro-LGBT rights. That said her obsession for maximum democracy on all issues would lead to bottomless bureaucratic layers.
She is the one who kickstarted everything but also jumped the gun on a number of occasions.
Both sides are equally to blame for factionalism and infighting, and anyone claiming otherwise is just signalling they were loyal to one faction.
Corbynites are too eager to work with centrists and liberals and would drift to the centre. Sultana loyalists would purity spiral and have launched online tirades against the Greens of all people.
Also Your Party just sucks arse as a name.