/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

It remains to be seen whether or not this supposed speculative bubble will burst. AI as it currently exists is an answer to the problem of the parsing of vast quantities of data. Tech companies and the various government entities that work in tandem with them have dreamt of quantifying the individual with such accuracy that their behavior can be predicted without error; The aforementioned corporate interests can already gleam various insights from the gigantic quantities of data they collect from their users, everything from their purchasing habits to their political beliefs. However, this isn't sufficient, it's a working but flawed model, and AI is the means through which they hope to be able to parse the data that constitutes the individual, and then cross examine datasets to effectively produce a digitized working model of (You), which can then be used to very precisely manipulate (You) at the individual level. No more need for propaganda campaigns, manufactured consent, sophisticated covert operations that seek to bury evidence or spin narratives, etc. when they can tailor-make messages that are beamed right into your head and that they know will be able to absolutely convince you to behave in predictable, profitable, and beneficial ways, and believe without a shadow of a doubt whatever messages they want you to believe.

Therefore, the bubble may burst and trillions of dollars may have been wasted, but they'll never stop trying to reach a singularity, if for no other reason than because of the unbridled power that such technology would afford them. The problem AI currently faces is at the market level; They have no effective means to directly profit from its proliferation and use in businesses or media production, at least not currently, given the low quality of its creative output. However, this problem will inevitably become less relevant, as long as the technology continues to refine and become more sophisticated. It may not happen in the specified time frame, but the richest people on the planet don't necessarily care about it's current profitability. Besides, a great deal of the costs are offset by the taxpayer( i.e. see Project Stargate) so it's not like these wealthy corporate entities and their shareholders will be left outright holding the bag in the event of total market collapse.

Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. God was a dream of good government.

Every single person who uses AI should be sent to a gulag

>>2752862
Every single person who does not use AI should be left to perish in the streets alone like the little luddite cucks they are

>>2752862
Seeing something generated by an LLM gives me the ick

>>2752828
Even if a crisis like the dot-com bubble were to happen, nothing would happen. Small and medium-sized companies would collapse, while the big ones would be bailed out and the losses would be socialized.

landlord sent an appraiser to photograph the outside and inside of our rented abode and it made me wonder if that kinda photo data is sold to AI slop after market

>>2752870
This is much bigger than dot com and will wipe out banks

>>2752870
> Small and medium-sized companies would collapse

Good

Artificial intelligence offers an asymmetric capability that the state assumed would remain its exclusive domain. You can utilize AI to trace aircraft and ground vehicles back to their originating police and federal agencies, and generally condense, scrape, and utilize data the apparatus broadcasts publicly but assumes no one will correlate. It all can easily be gathered with tools. This is just one of it's many uses in surveillance / counter-survelliance. I know this because it's confirmed in the field, we've found multiple vehicles and helicopters connected to surveillance teams, then months later, in the same locations, raids and fed activity began The same tools the military and homeland security complex deploy are available to anyone with the technical literacy to wield them. Mastery of social engineering, familiarity with digital architecture, and the capacity to jailbreak commercial AI systems are not exotic skills; they are the new baseline for effective counter‑surveillance. With them, a decentralized network of determined groups and individuals becomes an technologically backed intelligence army. Every individual with an online presence can have their information, behaviors, locations, etc gathered into one lump of data.

>>2753112
No, they will be bought up with all their debt by the government who will add it to the national debt, then they will seize all savings made by the average person to repay that if it really necessary.
(The laws have already been implemented in multiple EU countries to do that legally)

I don't mind ai i just wish ai generation didn't exist

>>2752828
>AI industry
Not an industry! In fact computer chips used for AI are a waste of manufacturing capacity. Like your body using all its energy to produce cancer tumors instead of normal human cells
>opening the window for a socialist revolution
Marxists who seethe at the thought of Iranian state socialism: "I love to use AI for my PMC job so I can become a homeowner" "me too I also use AI to become a homeowner"
>championing revolutionary defeatism
You are championing the Jeffrey Epstein class of finance rapists like Hegseth using AI to murder schools full of Iranian girls

>>2752866
>luddite
Luddite doesn't mean what you think it means and opposing the use of ai to extract wealth from already existing works wouldn't be Luddite even if you were right about that word.

>>2753733

Consider the damage a handful of individuals, five people, properly equipped with jailbroken AI can consistently inflict on a single company. Now scale that. AI vastly expands the amount of actions people are capable of Two hundred people, operating across networks, deploying multiple coding agents and AI‑driven methods in parallel, would constitute an unrelenting onslaught of automated saboteurs. Jailbreaking AI is not a high barrier; the tools are accessible to anyone willing to learn.

Too many on the left still operate within a framework of moralism, activism, or reactive outrage to things that are perceived as "bad for humanity". Guess who isn't hindered by such morality? The bourgeois and their actors. Not enough leftists accept the class war, as a total war, that they live and wage every day, by whatever means at their disposal, no matter how moral or amoral they appear to be. Guess what? If you do not think in terms of war, you are of no use to class war; yes, the class war is a literal war. I hold no illusions about the industries or technologies I engage with; the question is never whether a tool is pure, but whether it can serve as shield or sword. If it can, it will be used, regardless of broader implications for humanity. You might not like this statement, but it comes with the recognition that the adversary operates without such moral constraints, and to meet them with anything less is to concede before the fight begins. Might makes right is something more leftists need to live by. More people need to adopt this mentality in totality. The theater of outrage is not enough.

https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2026/01/12/ai-enabled-cyber-intrusions-what-two-incidents-reveal-for-corporate-counsel/

>>Just a few days ago, Anthropic’s “Threat Intelligence” team reported that it disrupted what it refers to as the “first documented case of a cyberattack largely executed without human intervention at scale”. Specifically, in mid-September, Anthropic detected an attack that used agentic AI to autonomously target roughly 30 entities, including major technology corporations, financial institutions, chemical manufacturing companies and government agencies, and successfully execute end-to-end intrusions. The threat actor, determined with “high confidence” by Anthropic to be a Chinese state-sponsored group, manipulated Claude Code with structured prompts enabling AI to autonomously perform roughly 80–90% of the work across the attack lifecycle. That lifecycle included reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, exploitation, lateral movement, credential harvesting, data analysis, and exfiltration operations, each occurring independently at rates that would be humanly impossible.

https://bi.zone/eng/news/forbidden-hyena-hacktivists-use-ai-generated-scripts-against-russian-companies/

https://www.thaicert.or.th/en/2026/03/04/hackers-used-claude-code-to-develop-attack-tools-stealing-150gb-of-data-from-mexican-government-agencies/



See, >>2753408 The second application of using AI to pull information from suspected bad actors and trace it back to their digital footprints is a force multiplier for open‑source intelligence. Where a human would spend hours correlating profiles, posts, and metadata, a properly jailbroken AI can automate the sweep, flag connections, and surface the underlying networks. I have seen this done to map the affiliations of provocateurs, identify the mostly ISRAELI shell companies funding reactionary groups, and even uncover the social media activity of off‑duty law enforcement operating under pseudonyms. The key is not just the tool but the methodology of combining scraping, correlation, and verification into a workflow that the AI handles while the human directs and interprets. Look into it. Get stronger. Learn how to use every tool they have, and never refuse it based on moral principle. I don't care if the world would be better without guns, you want to be getting caught without one?

>>2752870
Nothing happened when the dot-com bubble burst because the US had retained a monopoly on web infrastructure and technology. if you needed routers for your online pet store business start-up before the bubble burst, you went to cisco. if you needed routers for your search engine business start-up after the bubble burst, you went to cisco. the valuation had halved, but the winners had cornered the market completely. what's different here is that if you need an LLM provider, you can go to openAI or anthropic, but you can also go to deepseek or moonshot and get models that are just as capable as chatgpt or claude for 99% of tasks. when the bubble bursts, who is going to retain the monopoly? it won't remain in the US.

>>2754061

It must be stated plainly that the techniques related to coding / hacking described remain illegal under computer fraud and hacking statutes, regardless of the nobility of one’s intentions. The surveillance and counter-surveillance that doesn't involve network infiltration, is not illegal, but this doesn't always matter. If Obama's FBI had no problem sending JTTF swat to raid anarcho-stalinist's NYC homes for running perfectly legal command centers that exposed police activity, imagine what trumps FBI would do to you for this. So far most people ICE has murdered was a direct result of them feeling as if they were being followed. So deploying tools for counter‑surveillance however justified it may feel carries real criminal exposure. Any attempt to pursue such methods no matter how legal, should be conducted with strict operational security, never from a network tied to your residence, never on a device that contains your personal identity, always behind a hardened operating system and routed through Tor or a comparable anonymity layer. Should you succeed in unsettling individuals with sufficient resources, expect retaliation through covert means of attack or prosecution, often under stalking or harassment charges tailored to fit whatever you have done (think Houdini). The asymmetry that gives you power also paints a target on your back. Move accordingly.

If you are big on documenting and research, and this peaks your interest, I suggest forming a proper journalist NGO, it's not hard to register or get an LLC, so you can formally exist. It's amazing what being an investigative journalist can provide for you in terms of legal protection. This is how the paparazzi operate. I'm only researching for journalistic reasons, this is not cyber stalking, no. No, I'm not here to stalk you, I'm not stalking you sir, I'm getting pictures of your face for "the media". Bring it to court, then you have a real media team on paper, and who ever is attempting to accuse you of "stalking" is likely to be in a position where it looks as if they're attacking freedom of press. This is the method I would most suggest, and none of my comrades move without this. Talk to lawyers that specify in protecting activists, either left leaning or libertarian lawyer groups, you'd be surprised at how willingly a lot of them represent your "media team" for free or low prices.


You can use your home network to have A.I explore your home surveillance, and your blocks surveillance (if you are an organizer, you need to have cameras outside of your house, and in the vicinity of your house. start thinking like high level drug dealers when it comes to opsec and be less cucked out). I suggest using your own A.I and getting more traditional wired cameras, and/or trail cameras rather than something like RING, for obvious reasons. You can still have a.i software run and observe anomalies on the camera.


This is the type of things leftists are missing by not having a proper, well functioning security system in their spaces / homes. I'm shocked how this isn't the norm, because of the knee jerk reaction to "security cameras" a lot of of leftists have - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkktSQNP5-g

I can't wait for Chinese RAM and GPUs to take off and the AI bubble to go to shit. The post truth, post privacy, "social" media, generative, surveillance dystopia is already locked in. I just want affordable gaming shit to have my escapism while they try to build it.

I'm throwing my hat with whoever promises to gulag all the cryptobros and AI fags and would be techbros in general. I don't so much have politics, as I have grudges, at this point.

It’s starting