/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

its a different thing yeah. but it can still be misogynistic and perpetuate harmful ideas

>>2763778
Yeah but that really depends on the artist, and the same can be said with any media depicting women. Most of these artists tend to be some flavor of progressive and half of it's gay anyway.

>>2763775
there is no ethical consumption under capitalism

>>2763775
>is sexual idpol or drawn sexual idpol morally wrong
Get the fuck out of here.

its funny how men thought porn was perfectly okay until women figured out how to cut out the middle man and earn a living as freelance content creators and now suddenly men consider it morally repugnant. when it was some greasy gross man hawking girls gone wild tapes it was fine, but when its camwhores making money on onlyfans it's the end of society, especially if they don't reply to your dms

If you jerk off to a drawing another guy made, you're gay because it's like he's jerking you off with his mind

>>2763973
As long as someone is producing pornography.

>>2763775
Any form of porn is destructive for anyone included, drawn porn sometimes is worse because it not only sexualise people but create unrealistic expectations which has severe results for people consuming this content and people around them.

I'm fine with nudity as form of art but porn isn't a art in any way, it's just commodifitation of people and way to manipulate others into addiction for pure profit.

>>2763974
Cant argue with this logic.

>>2764240
Stop being spooked, a drawing is just a drawing. You sound exactly like those christian wanting to ban porn for spooky moralistic reasons. Last I checked, communists don't give a damn about morality.

>>2764254
It's not about morality but how porn industry does commodify and exploit both creators and consumers, this includes drawn porn.

You're ignoring obvious fact that current distribution of porn is solely result of expanded exploatition of people inside industry and normalisation of such media because certain people and companies make money of someone's addiction.

As for ban, I am obviously for banning porn industry/companies, not the porn itself.

Obviously I agree that drawing is just a drawing, but we have to acknownledge the fact that those drawings are also part of the larger problem rooted in patriarchy and exploatition.

No one has self-intrest in normalisation of drawn pornography except for those who profit from it, gooners are just unconsciously addicted retards.

>>2764263
Opinions about exploitation are not moralism?

>>2764268
Ofc they're not, I just state that exploatition is against self and class intrest of everyone included in porn industry.

>>2764263
Go back to /pol/

>>2764263
>No one has self-intrest in normalisation of drawn pornography except for those who profit from it.
I think this is an interesting point. But why exactly would it not be in the gooner's self-interest?

>>2764362
Because he's unconscious victim of his own addiction which does cause him to involuntary be a cow for endless profit.

Those people don't only destroy their life by addiction which deepen their sexual frustrations but also some people make profit out of it.

Also they're definetly victims of porn in terms of social interactions, alot of males get addicted to porn at very young age (including drawn ones) which determinate their inability in socialising with opposite sex and even may cause rise of misoginistic behaviours which obviously isn't beneficial for them but they don't realise it until it's too late.

i notice that tumblr is covered in ads for some hardcore ai generated fetish porn now. remember a few years ago when tumblr cracked down on "adult content" by basically shadowbanning every user who posted any remotely revealing pictures of themselves? apparently it was never actually the content itself that was morally objectionable, it was the human content creators who were the real target. it's okay to have a site covered in filthy depraved sexual content for perverts to jack off to, what isn't okay is human sex workers making a living off of it and expecting to be treated like human beings. ban all the sex workers and replace them with ai and suddenly there's no ethical dilemma, you can advertise all the creepy incest ai porn you want and nobody will complain.