I get why people dislike it most of the time; it's used by conservative parents to basically indoctrinate their children and socially isolate them, but thinking that makes homeschooling inherently bad is just like thinking all education is bad because bad people use it sometimes. A form of it could be very useful, especially for us Marxists who are often maligned by those controlling the current educational establishment. It's not like the current public school system is entirely flawless, with it often spewing anti-communist, pro-regime change, right-individualism, and pro-capitalist propaganda. If I had a kid, I wouldn't fully exclude them from public school, but I would perhaps add some sort of extra curriculum at home where I'd teach them Marxist theory, unbiased history of past socialist experiments that doesn't automatically default to (Mao killing 100 billion innocent kulaks in the gulags), and other useful things that may be discouraged elsewhere. I'd kind of be like homework but with studying Marx, Lenin, and even Franz Fanon and perhaps other leftist tendencies like anarchism since it's good to know what your opponents on the left think; marxists.org would be very useful for this, actually. This is especially relevant as it seems like reactionary forces, particularly in the United States, are trying to hijack the school system, such as Project 2025 or PragerU Kids.
The family will be abolished
>>2766581chud slop but man the dad in this scene is such a chad he totally owned his chud son sooo hard
>>2766614 omg where is this from
>>2766631The movie is called captain fantastic, about an idealistic leftist father who raises his children in the woods to be survivalists/ideological warriors
The dude is called adelman.aspires on insta
Wrong. Home schooling is wicked bourgeois phenomenon for multitude of reasons. That is why homeschooling is illegal in Communist China, Korea, and Cuba.
i don't want to have this conversation again
>>2766511It is inherently bad.
If you want to eliminate class cultural divides you have to have children of all backgrounds raised and educated in common. They have to draw from a shared pool of knowledge. They also need to have access to the same resources. That is why homeschooling and private schooling are reactionary.
Homeschooling is good because both public and private school under capitalism are garbage
>>2766656>>2766792Retarded idealists
kids pretty much homeschool themselves nowadays, they learn more sitting at home reading wikipedia than they do from their shitty public school that has no funding and no qualified staff and isn't allowed to teach anything that might offend the far-right christian fundamentalist pta moms who continually bombard the public education system with one frivolous lawsuit after another
>>2766656This, lmao.
Home schooling is like top 4 in the list of petit bourgeois aberrations and only retarded Americans support that shit.
I get why people dislike it most of the time; it's used by wealthy corporations to maximize profit and sometimes deny care to those in need, but thinking that makes private healthcare inherently bad is just like thinking all markets are bad because some exploit them. A form of it could be very useful, especially for us progressives who are often maligned by the current bureaucratic healthcare establishment. It's not like the current public system is entirely flawless, with it often delaying care, limiting patient choice, and failing to address individual needs effectively. If I had healthcare coverage, I wouldn't fully reject public options, but I would perhaps supplement them with private plans that allow more control over my care, faster access to specialists, and coverage for treatments that might be restricted elsewhere. I'd kind of be like a patient advocate for myself, making sure I can access top-notch care when needed, while also encouraging a competitive system that drives innovation and better outcomes. This is especially relevant as it seems like reactionary forces, particularly in the United States, are trying to monopolize the system, such as single-payer proposals that threaten choice and innovation.
I was home schooled for a little while. My mom said I would come home crying. So she took me and my sister out of school.
i was homepoliced for a while. whenever i got caught committing crimes like robberies and rapes, instead of getting arrested by the police and put in jail i would get a spanking from my mother.
>>2766935I'm too much of a pussy to rape.
>public schoolthey are increasingly privatized thanks to Obama's neoliberal economics:
https://bigeasymagazine.com/2025/05/11/public-money-private-control-inside-new-orleans-charter-school-overhaul/>In the nearly two decades since Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans has been held up as a national experiment in education reform. The city has erased its traditional public school system and replaced it with a network of independently run, publicly funded charter schools. Proponents call it a model of innovation, choice, and accountability. Detractors call it a hostile takeover. Somewhere in between lies a complex reality too often flattened into talking points.>What began as a response to disaster became a blueprint for disruption. Teachers were fired, unions were broken, and entire communities lost control over neighborhood schools. Millions of public dollars have since flowed through charter management organizations with limited oversight, while families continue to navigate a maze of enrollment lotteries, inconsistent services, and school closures. >>2766511I find it hard how I would navigate life without being socialised in school as it's pretty much the point of reference for the majority of the population and you get exposed to various situations and people in a relatively safe "simulated' environment provided the teachers aren't pedophiles groomers.
Something to keep in mind: if a child is "special needs", they are not permitted to homeschool unless they are kicked out. If they are kicked out, the parents are lied to and told they can "homeschool" (which they have no way to do) but it doesn't count and the schools just use it as an excuse to initiate more lawfare if they "fail to homeschool" someone knowing the result beforehand.
The greatest reason someone would need to leave the school system is not used, and in practice homeschool is only there as an exception for "worthies". If you're in the occupied population to be destroyed, you are not actually permitted to homeschool. The only reason it exists is because they knew the schools were a torture and death factory for the occupied country, and they granted exemptions for those already selected to live.
Basically they want you to become an illegal alien in your own country, and then occupiers will tell you that they are the real and true inhabitants of this land. It's what Germans always do. Letting the system start in the first place was the beginning of the end for a free society.
I don't have any good advice for anyone. The lockouts are complete now. They have very effectively terminated any possibility of a way out of this, and they've already killed so many during the occupation. Hiding will not save you. They control every work place, and the general public marches in lockstep when it really matters. If you are potential trouble source, you are dead. It is not so much thoughtcrime but Crimes of Being that they have asserted, and they need only point a finger and say "DIE" and you are for all intents and purposes dead. Why do you retards think you'll have a revolution against that when you are afraid of your own shadow? Every idea given to you tells you to double down on it so much that it is unthinkable that this Germanic institution was so egregious that when it was first introduced there were riots against it. It's truly bizarre that this thing could be rebranded as a service or a thing necessary for democracy when it's entire function has been to destroy a democratic society as a prelude to just destroying the people and turning the world into an aristocracy-controlled cesspit.
It's already done. The democide began in the 1980s, accelerated in the 1990s, and it was cheered on every step of the way. I expect within 50 years they will have depopulated the world to the stated goal of 500 million. No one can survive what I saw and it's only become worse, and the resistance weaker with every year. It's not that it is logically impossible to end this. We could end it tomorrow if we really set out to do that. But, I know that will not happen because that's not what humans are and not something "in" them, and so you're left with the forces of the world that can be violently put down if they ever amount to a threat. There is no "other idea" that hasn't been thoroughly repudiated and made into mockery. That is how they made this terrible thing "default" and "natural" and get you to be something lower than a slave and think this is freedom. It's insane to see the excuses after all of these years, but why should I be surprised? Anyone who doesn't like it is either dead or pushed into overworld, durgged, shocked, nerve stapled, and made into a target of pure mockery. The visible example of anyone who rejects this ethos is made every day and you see the same sort of people invariably succeed and the same sort of people invaraibly lose, all selected before they were ten years old. It's ridiculous that you think anything can change. A Satanic race cannot change.
If however you're talking about learning at home, that's always what everyone did. You literally couldn't learn a single thing in those schools if you followed their lesson plan. It was designed to ensure that you would fail if you had to rely on the system, so they could prove their theory that you're just naturally too retarded to be anything. Everyone I knew, regardless of what track they were on, said they learned at home and had to take extra time to undo the damage of this piss poor education. If the system gives anything, it gives the barest minimum only after someone has been psychologically beaten down so much that they can barely think, and it promotes credulous idiots and tells them to shout very loud. That's what Germanic education did to you as a start, and that's putting mildly the damage this beast did.
Things that are missing for a lot of people of my cohort: religious education so that you have a proper standard of comparison for the abstract ideas religion deals with, meaningful political education unless you were on AP track (and what you get on AP is degraded and intended to slot you into a tracked ideology for your caste/assignment), basic logic and knowledge of the law, any sound grounding for arithmetic and mathematics. English-language reading education is structured entirely to prove that you're illiterate (their cornerstone is that you are illiterate until proven literate by decree, to make real everything else Germanic education claims about the ideal school).
Out of necessity, the religious/political education was somewhat ameliorated by the people and wide avaiability of knowledge compared to the stifled knowledge of the 1990s (fear was at its peak then). Sensitive topics are controlled rigidly and opposition meand death, but it was impossible to maintain the level of forced ignorance that was imposed violently during the 1990s. As soon as people my age became adults we told anyone who would listen what was done to us, and by 2008 everyone knew that this was coming for everyone and those selected to live were always going to march in lockstep.
Political education today is made simpler by a fact that is generally accepted: there is no such thing as a democratic society or legal rights, and the republic is dead. No one believes in that or even the most basic concept of a republic, so much that it is trivial for the Fabians to rewrite entirely the very concepts of democracy and republicanism and tell you that the ontological opposite of those things is what democracy looks and feels like. You saw the results of that on display in 2020 and every "protest" movement that was given to you. Democracy as a concept has been so thoroughly repudiated. The only reason democracy is still believed as a pretense is the free stuff the government still hands out while that lasts, and that's always held as a threat to make sure no one says no to any decree that will be imposed on them. Nothing about the welfare state is sustainable and if you wanted to make it work you would admit the New Deal programs were shitty by design and you could do so much of the welfare state easier. Hell, you could just write people a flat check and do away with the micromanagement that was never necessary in the first place, but that would be too decent. But, the real problem isn't that people don't have enough money. It's a designed lack of any security or stability, and so any money you get will just be consumed by the predatory element, and if you have any left over you really have nothing to spend money on but drugs and filth. The problem is now self-perpetuating and cannot be escaped. They poison everything and you're told it's normal to be bloated fat like the humans in WALL-E.
Unique IPs: 12