The US left is a graveyard of wasted motion, but nowhere is the dead rotting flesh more visible than in the bookkeeping of its "vanguard" parties.
>>The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is currently nursing a seven-figure debt, cutting half a million dollars from its own staff while chasing the electoral dragon. The entire organization spent just $10,783 on federal elections in 2024, a pittance that gets swallowed whole by a single real estate developer’s check. They dump millions into campaigns (just look at the $28,000 a single mayoral candidate paid his local DSA chapter for "texting"), yet can’t scrape together the funds to keep a single free clinic running. This is the political economy of the professional left, burn cash on consultants, beg for donations to pay off debt, and call it "building power."
>>Meanwhile, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) isn’t even in the same league. Their idea of a "revolutionary" budget is a phone bank asking for $101 donations to "defeat the extreme-right," with zero transparent accounting of how those dollars translate into actual working-class power. For all their talk of centralism, they’ve been reduced to a glorified NGO, fundraising for Cuban pacemakers instead of organizing the oppressed in their own backyard.
Where does all this money go? It certainly doesn’t go to the people. DSA pours its resources into "inside the system" electoralism, running candidates on the Democratic Party line and calling it a "conquest of ballots". They spend fortunes on primary campaigns, Jamaal Bowman’s loss was the most expensive primary in U.S. history, while anarchists and real leftists open free clinics in dingy squats, scraping by on shoestring budgets because they actually live with the people they claim to serve.
This is the hypocrisy of the white‑collar left. They are careerists, middle managers, and petty‑bourgeois intellectuals who have never missed a meal. Their politics are a hobby, not a survival strategy. They call the lumpen "counter‑revolutionary" and the blue‑collar worker "crude," then retreat to their academic castles to write another resolution about "building dual power." Meanwhile, anarchists, the ones with actual class composition rooted in the working class and the dispossessed are the ones running the real mutual aid networks, organizing prison strikes, and keeping the lights on in the community spaces that these NGO‑leftists refuse to fund.
Let’s be clear, Every dollar the DSA and CPUSA raise for political campaigns is a dollar stolen from direct working‑class power. That money could have opened a dozen free clinics, sustained a network of squats, or built the infrastructure for a real working class power. Instead, it funds the careers of the very bureaucrats who will sell us out the moment the state offers them a seat at the table.
This is why anarchists are more revolutionary by nature, they don’t have a stake in the system. They are the dropouts, the blue‑collar workers, the lumpen who have nothing to lose but their chains. The Marxist‑Leninists, by contrast, are white‑collar bureaucrats who approach politics as a career path. They are legitimately inside the system, enjoying its partial benefits, and terrified of losing them. They will never smash the state because they are already living off its crumbs.
Study anarchism. Study Mao. Stop being indirect, lazy, careerist scum. Build the clinics. Organize the prisons. Burn the electoral bridge. We need to stop asking for permission and start taking what’s ours. Until then, let the debt‑ridden NGO‑leftists drown in their own paperwork. We have real work to do. People need to stop treating anarchists as mockery of the left, when indeed their political models and organizations seem to directly benefit the working-class way more than any Marxist party. I speak from experience here; when anarchist collectives form and exist for a long time, they often have a purpose and stick to that purpose. Example, go look into the Anarchist Black Cross. Their model is better for the west, and if Marxists adopt said models, the bourgeiose would lose their marbles. Trust me.
the idea of asking immiserated wage workers to pay dues to be part of your irrelevant party is absolutely bloody hilarious like yeah no wonder these parties are filled with college students and middle classers lmfao
>This is why [ideologues] are more revolutionary by nature
oh wait youre retarded too nvm lol
>Study anarchism
top tier shitpost
>DSA and CPUSA
>marxist-leninists
Marge?
>>2786660I'm not pushing any ideology here. The facts are simple, anarchists have done more for the working class than Marxist-Leninists or DemSoc parties, and that's been the case ever since the Black Panthers were destroyed. The evidence backs me up, so go ahead and stay mad, I agree, you should be mad. Why are Marxists so inactive and careerist? If Marxists can do what anarchists do better, then let's fucking do it. I'm speaking from experience here. These are people I've seen run prison solidarity and free clinics on budgets they had to give their heart and souls to collect, I see no major Marxist party engaging in this. I've been around quite a long time, and have been in every North American country. Modern Anarchists have even engaged in more successful labor struggles than Marxist-Leninists. I'm measuring success by how they organized it on their own terms rather than tailing liberal labor organizations. You should be mad, but not at me pointing out the fact, you should be mad AT THE FACT. The fact that so many marxists in the USA are careerists.
>>2786675>I'm not pushing any ideology here.<also read anarchism and mao and just Do Things(tm)cool
Inter-imperialist conflict.
>>2786679you can smugpost all you want but simply ignoring the rest of his points shows you are actually insecure
>>2786670Anarchism isn't really an ideology. It's a tension, a temperament, a way of moving. It overlaps with Maoism more than most book‑drunk MLs want to admit. Study praxis. You losers spend decades drowning in theory but never ask the only questions that matter, how do we do, when do we do, why do we do. What is to be done?
Anarchists and Maoists write better texts on action because they actually act. You don't learn how to act, how not to act, by being inactive and afraid to fail and get burnt. If you don't want to learn how to be active, then stay in your fucking book clubs, you good little labor aristocrats. Let me be clear, any Marxist‑Leninist without the Maoism, is more of a class enemy than any anarchist. Period.
>>Imagine calling squatting and prison strikes lifestylist as you organize bookclubs and tail electionsThis is the white-collar dominated left, right here, comrades. They were good little boys and girls in school, and now they're good little workers. We want people who were "bad" from the start. People like this need to sit back and give us endless cash, and lawyers.
>>2786688lmao im sure the currently dormant labor movement will rise again from giving soup to homeless people or something
>simply ignoring the rest of his pointsmaybe learn to read a simple reply chain before posting lol
>>2786689>Anarchism isn't really an ideology. It's a tension, a temperament, a way of movingLMFAO maotards truly can only speak in gibberish. do you believe in astrology too?
>>2786694You fools don't even know your own history. Lenin's older brother was hanged for an assassination plot, a nihilist act of terror that seared revolutionary fury into his bones. Lenin borrowed his most famous pamphlet's title from Chernyshevsky, the high priest of Russian nihilism. And the man Lenin hailed as a "titan of the revolution"? Sergey Nechaev, the nihilist who preached that a revolutionary knows only "the science of destruction and extermination," that "poison, the knife, the noose" are all consecrated by the revolution. Lenin shared Nechaev's belief that the revolution justifies any crime. Without that nihilistic, adventurist current, this temperament of revolt, there is no revolutionary Lenin. The Black Panthers were the first publishers to translate anarcho-nihilist texts to English, and even called it "the bible for revolutionaries who want to act sooner rather than later".
>>2786692Anarchists and their people organized the biggest prison strikes in U.S. history, right before Trump's election. That's because blue‑collar workers and lumpens actually end up in prison way more often than white‑collar types. Being rooted in the real working class made that possible. Sorry, bud. I know that doesn't impress yall labor aristocrats as much as organizing voting campaigns for DNC canidates.
>>2786675> anarchists have done more for the working class than Marxist-Leninists or DemSoc partiesin the United States perhaps
>>2786711>>maybe in the USWELL NO SHIT THAT'S WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT, the DSA stands for Democratic Socialists of America. That should tell you the context. And here's the thing for real for real, talk to any well‑read anarchist, and you'll rarely hear them trash the Marxist‑Leninists who actually pulled off successful national liberation struggles. So what's the real issue with Marxists backing anarchist praxis when it works? Get a grip on the idealism and start asking yourself the question Lenin and the Russian nihilists asked, "what is to be done?". Then act. DIRECTLY. Stop middle manning through bourgeoise institutions. Lenin would support everything I'm saying.
>Anarchism isn't really an ideology. It's a tension, a temperament, a way of moving.
This is why anyone with two braincells closes the anarchist library instantly because you are guaranteed to meet such poetic nonsense almost immediately from their confused "theorists".
American son, you are man now. You must chose.
Will you marry the Democrat party or will you marry the lumpen?
>>2786723Well, no fucking shit. The anarchist library is open, anyone can publish on it easily. That's like saying "leftism is garbage because there's shitposting on leftypol, so I'm never reading anything leftist again." I love how idealistic you people are. You completely skip over the actual points and hyperfocus on bashing one specific anti‑capitalist camp mentioned in the thread. This is pathetic. Does everything fly right over leftypol's head, or what? Honestly, Instagram leftists seem to have more brainpower than this place.
>>2786727Most anarchists in the west are in socdem parties, fyi.
>>2786733>leftism is garbageBut that's also true. Only Marxism isn't garbage.
>>2786733>I love how idealistic you people are. You completely skip over the actual points and hyperfocus on bashing one specific anti‑capitalist camp mentioned in the thread. its always like this, they treat everything as team sports on this website
>>2786736You're an idealist, plain and simple. You pick a camp like you're picking a character in a video game, then act like there's zero room for critique or movement inside that camp. That doesn't help anyone grow. It just makes you easy to manipulate by people who either fake your politics or actually share them, but then push useless or bad praxis anyway.
This problem is everywhere on the left. Y'all are doing idealism instead of dialectical materialism. End of story.
Marxists refusing to learn from people who are way more active than their own orgs just because those people don't have the same "tendency" label means you don't actually want to build working-class power. You want your specific ideology to win in the marketplace of ideas. And if someone's organizing doesn't match your party line perfectly, you call it deviation and act like supporting them would be giving power to the other idealogue camps. The thing is, Anarchists are guilty of this at times to. Those of us who are most based give zero shits about label, we just want working class power and fury to rise.
Anything else isn't class war. It's a war of idealism. And it's pathetic to be honest.
>>2786764You aren't slick, I know.
The US is already communist and has been since 1865